Magno and parvo stimuli affect illusory directional hearing in normal and dyslexic readers

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2068-2074

  Li, Winston ^a   Meekins, Kelsey ^a   Schirillo, James ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dyslexia; Illusory directional hearing; Magnocellular; Parvocellular; Temporal processing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSORY DIRECTIONAL HEARING; MAGNOCELLULAR PATHWAY; MALE; PARVOCELLULAR PATHWAY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SOUND DETECTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DYSLEXIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862864548     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Boden C., Giaschi D. M-stream deficits and reading-related visual processes in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:346-366.
2. Boder E. Developmental dyslexia. A new diagnostic approach based on the identification of three subtypes. Journal of School Health 1970, 40(6):289-290.
3. Boder E. Developmental dyslexia: a diagnostic approach bases on three atypical reading-spelling pattern. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 1973, 15(5):663-687.
4. Boder E., Jarrico S. The Boder Test of Reading-Spelling Patterns: A Diagnostic Screening Test for Subtypes of Reading Disability 1982, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio.
5. Borsting E., Ridder W.H., Dudeck K., Kelley C., Matsui L., Motoyama J. The presence of a magnocellular defect depends on the type of dyslexia. Vision Research 1996, 36:1047-1053.
6. Breitmeyer B.G. Unmasking visual masking: a look at the "why" behind the veil of the "how". Psychological Review 1980, 87(1):52-69.
7. Breitmeyer B.G., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review 1976, 83(1):1-36.
8. Cooper B., Sun H., Lee B. Psychophysical and physiological responses to gratings with luminance and chromatic components of different spatial frequencies. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2012, 29(2):A314-A323.
9. Dellorso S., Schirillo J. Light location influences the perceived locations of internal sounds. Perception 2010, 39:91-102.
10. Dykman R.A., Ackerman P.T. Attention deficit disorder and specific reading disability: separate but often overlapping disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1991, 24(2):96-103.
11. Elsner A.E., Pokorny J., Burns S.A. Chromaticity discrimination: effects of luminance contrast and spatial frequency. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1986, 3(7):920-926.
12. Facoetti A., Trussardi A.N., Ruffino M., Lorusso M.L., Cattaneo C., Galli R., et al. Multisensory spatial attention deficits are predictive of phonological decoding skills in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(5):1011-1102.
13. Farmer M.E., Klein R.M. The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: a review. Psychological Bulletin & Review 1995, 2(4):460-493.
14. Felton R.H., Wood F.B., Brown I.S., Campbell S.K., Harter M.R. Separate verbal memory and naming deficits in attention deficit disorder and reading disability. Brain and Language 1987, 31(1):171-184.
15. Felton R.H., Wood F.B. Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities 1989, 22(1):3-13.
16. Galaburda A.M., Menard M.T., Rosen G.D. Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A 1994, 91:8010-8013.
17. Gross-Glenn K., Skottun B.C., Glenn W., Kushch A., Lingua R., Dunbar M., et al. Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia. Visual Neuroscience 1995, 12:153-163.
18. Hari R. Illusory directional hearing in humans. Neuroscience Letters 1995, 189(1):29-30.
19. Hari R., Kiesilä P. Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters 1996, 205(2):138-140.
20. Hari R., Renvall H. Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2001, 5(12-1):525-532.
21. Hari R., Renvall H., Tanskanen T. Left minineglect in dyslexic adults. Brain 2001, 124(7):1373-1380.
22. Hari R., Valta M., Uutela K. Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters 1999, 271(3):202-204.
23. Helenius P., Uutela K., Hari R. Auditory stream segregation in dyslexic adults. Brain 1999, 122(5):907-913.
24. Kujala T., Myllyviita K., Tervaniemi M., Alho K., Kallio J., Näätänen R. Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology 2000, 37(2):262-266.
25. Lallier M., Tainturier M.-J., Dering B., Donnadieu S., Valdois S., Thierryh G. Behavioral and ERP evidence for amodal sluggish attentional shifting in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(14):4125-4135.
26. Livingstone M.S., Rosen G.D., Drislane F.W., Galaburda A.M. Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 1991, 99:7943-7947.
27. Lovegrove W.J., Bowling A., Badcock D., Blackwood M. Specific reading disability: difference in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. Science 1980, 210:439-440.
28. Lovegrove W.J., Garzia R.P., Nicholson S.B. Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability. Journal of the American Optomological Association 1990, 61(2):137-146.
29. Lovegrove W.J., Heddle M., Slaghuis W. Reading disability: spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information store. Neuropsychologia 1980, 18:111-115.
30. Lovegrove W., Martin F., Bowling A., Blackwood M., Badcock D., Paxton S. Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20(3):309-315.
31. Lovegrove W., Martin F., Slaguis W. A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1986, 3(2):225-267.
32. Mays A., Schirillo J. Lights can reverse illusory directional hearing. Neuroscience Letters 2005, 384(3):336-338.
33. McAnany J.J., Alexander K.R. Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways. Vision Research 2006, 46:1574-1584.
34. Pokorny J., Smith V.C. Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1997, 14(9):2477-2486.
35. Renvall H., Hari R. Auditory cortical responses to speech-like stimuli in dyslexic adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14(5):757-768.
36. Rudvin I. Visual evoked potentials for reversals of red-green gratings with different chromatic contrasts: asymmetries with respect to isoluminance. Visual Neuroscience 2005, 22:749-758.
37. Schulte-Körne G., Deimel W., Bartling J., Remschmidt H. Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a specific speech processing deficit. Neuroreport 1998, 26(9(2)):337-340.
38. Skottun B.C. On the conflicting support for the magnocellular-deficit theory of dyslexia. Response to Stein, Talcott and Walsh (2000). Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 4(6):211-212.
39. Skottun B.C., Parke L.A. The possible relationship between deficits and dyslexics: examination of a critical assumption. Journal of Learning Disability 1999, 32:2-5.
40. Skottun B.C., Skoyles J.R. The early part of the visual system - from the retina to the visual cortex - contains two parallel streams: the magnocellular and parvocellular systems. Journal of Learning Disabilities 2005, 38(5):386-410.
41. Skoyles J., Skottun B.C. On the prevalence of magnocellular deficits in the visual system of non-dyslexic individuals. Brain and Language 2004, 88(1):79-82.
42. Slaghuis W.L. Letter to the editor. Vision Research 2007, 47:1976-1977.
43. Slutsky D.A., Recanzone G.H. Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. NeuroReport 2001, 12(1):7-10.
44. Stein J. Dyslexia-impaired temporal information processing?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1993, 14(682):83-86.
45. Stein J. The sensory basis of reading problems. Developmental Neuropsychology 2001, 20(2):509-534.
46. Stein J. Visual motion sensitivity and reading. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1785-1793.
47. Stein J., Talcott J. Impaired neural timing in developmental dyslexia-the magnocellular hypothesis. Dyslexia 1999, 5:59-77.
48. Stein J., Walsh V. To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neuroscience 1997, 20(4):147-152.
49. Stuart G.W., McAnally K.I., Castles A. Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit?. Vision Research 2001, 41(24):3205-3211.
50. Tallal P., Stark R.E., Mellitis E.D. Identification of language-impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain and Language 1985, 25:314-322.
51. Tallal P., Miller S.L., Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M. The role of temporal processing in developmental language-based learning disorders: research and clinical implications. Foundations of Reading Acquisition and Dyslexia: Implications for Early Intervention 1997, 49-66. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, USA. B.A. Blachman (Ed.).
52. Tove'e M. An Introduction to the Visual System 2008, Cambridge University Press, N.Y., N.Y. 2nd edn.
53. Van Ingelghem M., van Wieringen A., Wouters J., Vandenbussche E., Onghena P., Ghesquière P. Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia. Neuroreport 2001, 12(16):3603-3607.
54. Vellutino F.R., Pruzek R.M., Steger J.A., Meshoulam U. Immediate visual recall in poor and normal readers as a function of orthographic-linguistic familiarity. Cortex 1973, 9(4):370-386.
55. Vellutino F.R., Smith H., Steger J.A., Kaman M. Reading disability: age differences and the perceptual-deficit hypothesis. Child Development 1975, 46(2):487-493.
56. Vellutino F.R., Steger J.A., Kaman M., De Setto L. Visual form perception in deficient and normal readers as a function of age and orthographic-linguistic familiarity. Cortex 1975, 11(1):22-30.
57. Vidyasagar T.R., Pammer K. Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Science 2010, 14(2):57-63.
58. Witton C., Talcott J.B., Hansen P.C., Richardson A.J., Griffin T.D., Rees A., et al. Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology 1998, 8:791-797.