Evaluation of a visual feedback system in gait retraining: A pilot study

Gait and Posture

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 182-186

  Hamacher, Daniel ^a   Bertram, Dietrich ^a   Fölsch, Cassandra ^a   Schega, Lutz ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Duchenne gait; Gait training; Total hip replacement; Trendelenburg gait; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; GAIT; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TRUNK; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

AGED; BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; GAIT; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 84862861686     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: 18792219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Pai V.S. Significance of the Trendelenburg test in total hip arthroplasty: influence of lateral approaches. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11:174-179.
2. Vogt L., Brettmann K., Pfeifer K., Banzer W. Walking patterns of hip arthroplasty patients: some observations on the medio-lateral excursions of the trunk. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:309-317.
3. Lugade V., Wu A., Jewett B., Collis D., Chou L. Gait asymmetry following an anterior and anterolateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2010, 25:675-680.
4. Vogt L., Banzer W., Galm R., Pfeifer K. Muscle activation pattern of hip arthroplasty patients in walking. Res Sports Med 2004, 12:191-199.
5. Sander K., Layher F., Babisch J., Roth A. Evaluation of results after total hip replacement using a minimally invasive and a conventional approach clinical scores and gait analysis. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 2011, 149:191-199.
6. Perron M., Malouin F., Moffet H., McFadyen B.J. Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 2000, 15:504-515.
7. Tanaka Y. Gait analysis of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the those with total hip arthroplasty. Bio-Med Mater Eng 1998, 8:187-196.
8. Foucher K.C., Hurwitz D.E., Wimmer M.A. Preoperative gait adaptations persist one year after surgery in clinically well-functioning total hip replacement patients. J Biomech 2007, 40:3432-3437.
9. Arnold W. Gait analysis in patients with total hip endoprosthesis. Part II. Pre- and postoperative gait analysis. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 1992, 47:15-20.
10. Foucher K.C., Hurwitz D.E., Wimmer M.A. Relative importance of gait vs. joint positioning on hip contact forces after total hip replacement. J Orthop Res 2009, 27:1576-1582.
11. Hirokawa S. Biofeedback gait training system for temporal and distance factors. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989, 27:8-13.
12. Espay A.J., Baram Y., Dwivedi A.K., Shukla R., Gartner M., Gaines L., et al. At-home training with closed-loop augmented-reality cueing device for improving gait in patients with Parkinson disease. J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010, 47:573-582.
13. Montoya R., Dupui P., Pagès B., Bessou P. Step-length biofeedback device for walk rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994, 32:416-420.
14. Aruin A.S. Knee position feedback: its effect on management of pelvic instability in a stroke patient. Disabil Rehabil 2000, 22:690-692.
15. Dingwell J.B., Davis B.L., Frazier D.M. A rehabilitation treadmill with software for providing real-time gait analysis and visual feedback. J Biomech Eng 1996, 118:253-258.
16. Brettmann K., Vogt L., Galm R., Hartge S., Banzer W. Visual feedback gait training following total hip arthroplasty. Deut Z Sportmed 2006, 57:189-194.
17. Janssen L.J.F., Verhoeff L.L., Horlings C.G.C., Allum J.H.J. Directional effects of biofeedback on trunk sway during gait tasks in healthy young subjects. Gait Posture 2009, 29:575-581.
18. Taylor N.F., Goldie P.A., Evans O.M. Angular movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during self-selected and slow walking speeds. Gait Posture 1999, 9:88-94.
19. Stokes V.P., Andersson C., Forssberg H. Rotational and translational movement features of the pelvis and thorax during adult human locomotion. J Biomech 1989, 22:43-50.
20. Feipel V., Mesmaeker T., de Klein P., Rooze M. Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during treadmill walking at different speeds. Eur Spine J 2001, 10:16-22.
21. Crosbie J., Vachalathiti R., Smith R. Patterns of spinal motion during walking. Gait Posture 1997, 5:6-12.
22. Thurston A.J., Harris J.D. Normal kinematics of the lumbar spine and pelvis. Spine 1983, 8:199-205.
23. Linley H.S., Sled E.A., Culham E.G., Deluzio K.J. A biomechanical analysis of trunk and pelvis motion during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis compared to control subjects. Clin Biomech 2010, 25:1003-1010.
24. Goujon-Pillet H., Sapin E., Fodé P., Lavaste F. Three-dimensional motions of trunk and pelvis during transfemoral amputee gait. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2008, 89:87-94.
25. Cloete T., Scheffer C. Benchmarking of a full-body inertial motion capture system for clinical gait analysis. IEEE Eng Med Biol 2008, 2008:4579-4582.
26. Cloete T., Scheffer C. Repeatability of an off-the-shelf, full body inertial motion capture system during clinical gait analysis. IEEE Eng Med Biol 2010, 2010:5125-5128.
27. Bartonek Å., Saraste H., Eriksson M., Knutson L., Cresswell A.G. Upper body movement during walking in children with lumbo-sacral myelomeningocele. Gait Posture 2002, 15:120-129.
28. Perry J., Burnfield J.M. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function 2010, SLACK, Thorofare, NJ.
29. Götz-Neumann K. Gehen verstehen: Ganganalyse in der Physiotherapie; 18 Tabellen 2006, Thieme, Stuttgart.
30. Magill R.A. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications 2010, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.