Community-based, interdisciplinary geriatric care team satisfaction with an electronic health record: A multimethod study

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 300-311

  Sockolow, Paulina S ^a   Bowles, Kathryn H ^b   Lehmann, Harold P ^c,d   Abbott, Patricia A ^e   Weiner, Jonathan P ^c,d  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Aged; Clinical information systems; Nurses; Patient care team; Testing and evaluation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; STANDARD;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; GERIATRIC NURSING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT CARE TEAM;

EID: 84862836632     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31823eb561     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Berg M. The search for synergy: Interrelating medical work and patient care information systems. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42(4): 337-344.
2. Starfield BH, Simborg DW, Horn SD, Yourtee SA. Continuity and coordination in primary care: Their achievement and utility. Med Care. 1976; 14(7):625-636. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici= 0025- 7079%28197607%2914%3A7%3C625%3ACACIPC% 3E2.0.CO%3B2-K. Accessed February 21, 2011.
3. Tang PC, Coye MJ, Bakken S, et al. Key capabilities of an electronic health record system: Letter report. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record- id=10781&page=20. Accessed January 18, 2011.
4. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55(2):87-101.
5. Campbell EM, Guappone KP, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Ash JS. Computerized provider order entry adoption: Implications for clinical workflow. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):21-26.
6. Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, Campbell E, Guappone K. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(suppl 1):S69-S76.
7. Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: Implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 76(suppl 1):4-13.
8. Anderson GF. Medicare and chronic conditions. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:305-309.
9. Daly JM, Buckwalter K, Maas M. Written and computerized care plans. organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. J Gerontol Nurs. 2002;28(9):14-23.
10. Toth-Pal E, Nilsson GH, Furhoff AK. Clinical effect of computer generated physician reminders in health screening in primary health care-a controlled clinical trial of preventive services among the elderly. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73(9-10):695-703.
11. Lindner SA, Davoren JB, Vollmer A, Williams B, Landefeld CS. An electronic medical record intervention increased nursing home advance directive orders and documentation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(7):1001-1006. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/ abs/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01214.x. Accessed February 21, 2011.
12. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M, et al. Perceptions of physician order entry: Results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):313-323.
13. Xiao L, Dasgupta S. Measurement of user satisfaction with Webbased information systems: An empirical study. Proceedings of the 8th American Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, GA: AIS; 2002:1149.
14. Brender J. Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2006.
15. Cork RD, Detmer WM, Friedman CP. Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(2):164-176.
16. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:275-279.
17. Otieno OG, Toyama H, Asonuma M, Kanai-Pak M, Naitoh K. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: Questionnaire development. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(2):209-219.
18. Wakefield DS, Halbesleben J, Ward MM, Qiu Q, Brokel J, Crandall D. Development of a measure of clinical information systems expectations and experiences. Med Care. 2007;45(9): 884-890.
19. Urquhart C, Currel R, Grant MJ, Hardiker NR. Nursing record systems: Effects on nursing practice and health care outcomes [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1:1-18. http://mrw .interscience.wiley.com.ezproxy2.library. drexel.edu/cochrane/ clsysrev/articles/CD002099/. Accessed March 17, 2008.
20. Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care-trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(1):44-56.
21. Sockolow PS, Crawford PR, Lehmann HP. Broadening a general framework for evaluating health information technology through health services research evaluation principles. Methods Med Inform. In press.
22. Sockolow PS, Weiner JP, Bowles KH, Lehmann HP. A new instrument for measuring clinician satisfaction with electronic health records. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(10):574-585.
23. CMS. Program of all inclusive care for the elderly (PACE). http:// www.cms.hhs.gov/PACE/. Accessed January 11, 2010.
24. Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med InformAssoc. 1997;4(2):102-111. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih .gov/picrender.fcgi?artid= 61499&blobtype=pdf. Accessed February 21, 2011.
25. El-Kareh R, Gandhi T, Poon EG, et al. Trends in clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record. SGIM 31st Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Springer; 2008;23(suppl 2):427-428.
26. Mukamel DB, Peterson DR, Temkin-Greener H, et al. Program characteristics and enrollees' outcomes in the program of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE). Milbank Q. 2007;85(3):499-531.
27. Sullivan-Marx EM, Bradway CW, Barnsteiner J. Innovative collaborations: A case study for academic owned nursing practice. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42(1):50-57.
28. Ash JS, Lyman J, Carpenter J, Fournier L. A diffusion of innovations model of physician order entry. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:22-26.
29. Chen ES, Cimino JJ. Patterns of usage for a Web-based clinical information system. Medinfo. 2004:18-22.
30. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Pelayo S, Degoulet P, Anceaux F, Guerlinger S, Meaux JJ. A usability study of CPOE's medication administration functions: Impact on physician-nurse cooperation. Medinfo. 2004; 11(pt 2):1018-1022.
31. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011.
32. Morse JM. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Tashakkoru A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:189-208.
33. Greenacre MJ, ed. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1984.
34. Helleso R, Lorensen M, Sorensen L, Norman L, Bang K. Management of information between two nursing contexts. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:600-604.
35. Simpson G, Kenrick M. Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in clinical practice in a British general hospital. Comput Nurs. 1997; 15(1):37-42.
36. Tornvall E, Wilhelmsson S. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(16): 2116-2124.
37. Banet GA, Jeffe DB, Williams JA, Asaro PV. Effects of implementing computerized practitioner order entry and nursing documentation on nursing workflow in an emergency department. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006;20(2):45-54.
38. Vassar JA, Lin B, Planchock N. Nursing information systems: A survey of current practices. Top Health Inf Manage. 1999;20(1): 58-65.
39. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a two-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):69-84.
40. Ahn TS, Park IS, You OS, Shin HJ, Woo KS, Jo EM. Nurses' perceptions of and attitudes toward an electronic medical recordsystem at Seoul National University Hospital. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:851.
41. Kossman SP. Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses' work. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122: 337-341.
42. Darbyshire P. 'Rage against the machine?': Nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):17-25.
43. Murphy CA, Maynard M, Morgan G. Pretest and post-test attitudes of nursing personnel toward a patient care information system. Comput Nurs. 1994;12(5):239-244.
44. Sharman Z. Remembering the basics: Administrative technology and nursing care in a hospital emergency department. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(suppl 1):S222-S228.
45. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: Nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337-344.
46. Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M, Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(3):132-138.
47. Lee T, Mills ME, Bausell B, Lu M. Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(10):698-707.
48. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, Karsh BT. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):408-423.
49. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197-1203.