Quantifying and analyzing neighborhood configuration characteristics to cellular automata for land use simulation considering data source error

Earth Science Informatics

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 77-86

  Wu, Hao ^a   Zhou, Lu ^a   Chi, Xu ^a   Li, Yan ^a   Sun, Yurong ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cellular automata model; Data source error; Land use change; Neighborhood configuration; Resisting error disturbance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

CHINA; HUBEI; WUHAN;

EID: 84862828887     PISSN: 18650473     EISSN: 18650481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-012-0097-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Batty M, Xie Y, Sun Z (1999) Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban Syst 23(3): 203-233.
2. Chen Q, Mynett AE, Minns AW (2002) Application of cellular automata to modelling competitive growths of two underwater species Chara aspera and Potamogeton pectinatus in Lake Veluwe. Ecol Model 147(3): 253-265.
3. Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inform Sci: IJGIS 12(7): 699-714.
4. Couclelis H (1985) Cellular worlds - a framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics. Environ Plann 17(5): 585-596.
5. Craig PD (2010) Imposed and inherent scales in cellular automata models of habitat. Ecol Model 221(20): 2425-2434.
6. Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2010) Scale dependent inference in landscape genetics. Landsc Ecol 25(6): 967-979.
7. Deng JS, Wang K, Hong Y, Qi JG (2009) Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape patteern in response to rapid urganization. Landsc Urban Plann 92: 187-198.
8. Fonstad MA (2006) Cellular automata as analysis and synthesis engines at the geomorphology-ecology interface. Geomorphology 77(3-4): 217-234.
9. Gaucherel C (2009) Self-similar land cover heterogeneity of temperate and tropical landscapes. Ecol Complex 6(3): 346-352.
10. Hagoort M, Geertman S, Ottens H (2007) Spatial externalities, neighbourhood rules and CA land-use modelling. Ann Reg Sci 42(1): 39-56.
11. Hecht B, Moxley E (2009) Terabytes of Tobler: evaluating the first law in a massive. Domain-neutral representation of world knowledge. Spatial Inform Theory 5756: 88-105, Springer.
12. Karssenberg D, De Jong K (2005) Dynamic environmental modelling in GIS: 2. Modelling error propagation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(6): 623-637.
13. Kavzoglu T (2009) Increasing the accuracy of neural network classification using refined training data. Environ Model Softw 24(7): 850-858.
14. Keith CC, Leonard JG (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automata model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(7): 699-714.
15. Kocabas V, Dragicevic S (2006) Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(6): 921-953.
16. Lai T, Dragicevic S (2011) Development of an urban landslide cellular automata model: a case study of North Vancouver, Canada. Earth Sci Informatics 4(2): 69-80.
17. Li X, Yeh AG (2002) Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 16(4): 323-343.
18. Li X, Yang QS, Liu XP (2008) Discovering and evaluating urban signatures for simulating compact development using cellular automata. Landsc Urban Plann 86(2): 177-186.
19. Liu X, Li X, Shi X, Wu S, Liu T (2008) Simulating complex urban development using kernel-based non-linear cellular automata. Ecol Model 211(1-2): 169-181.
20. Menard A, Marceau DJ (2005) Exploration of spatial scale sensitivity in geographic cellular automata. Environ Plann Plann Des 32(5): 693-714.
21. Myint SW, Wang L (2006) Multicriteria decision approach for land use land cover change using Markov chain analysis and a cellular automata approach. Can J Remote Sens 32(6): 390-404.
22. Myint SW, Jain J, Lukinbeal C, Lara-Valencia F (2010) Simulating urban growth on the US-Mexico border: Nogales, Arizona, and Nogales, Sonora. Can J Remote Sens 36(3): 166-184.
23. Overmars KP, de Koning GHJ, Veldkamp A (2003) Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models. Ecol Model 164: 257-270.
24. Pan Y, Roth A, Yu Z, Doluschitz R (2010) The impact of variation in scale on the behavior of a cellular automata used for land use change modeling. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34(5): 400-408.
25. Santé I, García AM, Miranda D, Crecente R (2010) Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: A review and analysis. Landsc Urban Plann 96(2): 108-122.
26. Sun T, Wang J (2007) A traffic cellular automata model based on road network grids and its spatial and temporal resolution's influences on simulation. Simulat Model Pract Theor 15(7): 864-878.
27. Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46: 234-240.
28. Tobler WR (1979) Cellular geography. In Philosophy in geography. D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp 379-386.
29. Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Kok K, de Koning GHJ, Priess J, Bergsma AR (2001) The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling. Environ Model Assess 6(2): 111-121.
30. Verburg PH, Nijs TCM, Eck JR, Visser H, Jong K (2004) A method to analyse neighborhood characteristics of land use patterns. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(6): 667-690.
31. Wang Y, Li S (2011) Simulating multiple class urban land-use/cover changes by RBFN-based CA model. Comput Geosci 37(2): 111-121.
32. Wang J, Chen YQ, He T, Lv CY, Liu AX (2010) Application of geographic image cognition approach in land type classification using Hyperion image: a case study in China. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 12: S212-S222.
33. White R, Engelen G (1993) Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modelling approach to the evaluation of urban land-use patterns. Environ Plann 25: 1175-1199.
34. White R, Engelen G (1997) Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling. Environ Plann Plann Des 24: 235-246.
35. Wu DQ, Liu J, Zhang GS, Ding WJ, Wang W, Wang RQ (2009) Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into cellular automata model: an application to the dynamics of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis Lour.). Ecol Model 220(24): 3490-3498.
36. Wu H, Chen X, Li Z, Wang S, Cui W, Meng Q (2010) Identifying spatial patterns of land use and cover change at different scales based on self-organizing map. Adv Neural Netw Res Appl 67: 355-361, Springer.
37. Yang Q, Li X, Shi X (2008) Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Comput Geosci 34(6): 592-602.
38. Yeh A, Li X (2006) Errors and uncertainties in urban cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(1): 10-28.