Spatial externalities, neighbourhood rules and CA land-use modelling

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 39-56

  Hagoort, Michel ^a   Geertman, Stan ^a   Ottens, Henk ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; GIS; LAND USE; MODELING;

EID: 38549090130     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-007-0140-8     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Batty M (1997) Cellular automata and urban form: A primer. J Am Plann Assoc 63:266-274
2. Bouwer K, Leroy P (1995) Milieu en ruimte: Analyse en beleid. Boom, Amsterdam
3. Carletta J (1996) Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Comput Linguistics 22:249-254
4. Clawson M (1971) Suburban land-use conversion in the United States: An economic and governmental process. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore
5. Colby CC (1933) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in urban geography. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 23:1-20
6. Couclelis H (1985) Cellular worlds: A framework for modelling micro-macro dynamics. Environ Plann A 17:585-596
7. Davies G (1974) An econometric analysis of residential amenity. Urban Stud 11:217-225
8. Dear M (1977) Spatial externalities and locational conflict. In: Massey DB, Batey PWJ (eds) Alternative frameworks for analysis. London, Pion (Papers in Regional Science 7), pp 152-167
9. Dear M, Taylor SM, Hall GB (1980) External effects of mental health facilities. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 70:342-352
10. Engelen G, Geertman S, Smits P, Wessels C (1999) Dynamic GIS and strategic physical planning: A practical application to the IJmond/ Zuid-Kennemerland Region. In: Stillwell J, Geertman S, Openshaw S (eds) Geographical information and planning: Advances in spatial science. Springer, Berlin, pp 87-111
11. Engelen G (2002) Presentation at MODLUC: Advanced study course on modelling land-use change. University of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 27 October-2 November, European Commission, Environment and Climate Programme
12. Engelen G, White R, de Nijs T (2003) The environment explorer: Spatial planning support system for integrated assessment of socio-economic and environmental ploicies in the Netherlands. Integr Assessm 4:97-105
13. Geertman S, Hagoort M, Ottens H (2006) Spatial-temporal specific neighbourhood rules for cellular automata land use modelling. Int J Geograph Inform Syst (forthcoming)
14. Grether DM, Mieszkowski P (1980) Determinants of real estate values. J Urban Econ 1:127-146
15. Hagen A (2002) Multi-method assessment of map similarity. In: Ruiz M, Gould M, Ramon J (eds) Proceedings of the 5th AGILE conference on geographic information science, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pp 171-182
16. Hagen A (2003) Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 17:235-249
17. Hagoort MJ (2006) The neighbourhood rules: Land-use interactions, urban dynamics and cellular automata modelling. Netherlands Geographical Studies 334. KNAG/Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
18. Hammer TR, Coughlin RE, Horn ET IV (1971) The effect of a large urban park on real estate value. J Am Inst Plann 40:274-277
19. Harrop KJ (1973) Nuisances and their externality fields. Newcastle upon Tyne, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (Seminar Papers 23)
20. Harvey D (1971) Social processes, spatial form and the redistribution of real income in an urban system. In: Chisholm M (ed) Regional forecasting, Butterworth. Reprinted in: Stewart M (ed) (1972) The City, Penguin Books, pp 270-300
21. Harvey D (1973) Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, London
22. Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modelling. Remote Sensing Environ 86:286-302
23. Hoover EM, Giarratani F (1984) An introduction to regional economics. Knopf, New York
24. Junfeng J (2003) Transition rule elicitation for urban cellular automata models, Case study: Wuhan, China. Enschede, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation
25. Krugman P (1999) The role of geography in development. Int Reg Sci Rev 22:142-161
26. Li X, Lu L, Cheng G, Xiao H (2001) Quantifying landscape structure of the Heihe river basin, north-west China using FRAGSTATS. J Arid Environ 48:521-535
27. Lucas P, van Oort G (1993) Dynamiek in de stadsrandzone: Werken en wonen in de stadsrandzone van de agglomeratie Utrecht. Utrecht University, Utrecht (Nederlandse Geografische Studies 154)
28. Marshall A (1922) Principles of economics. Macmillan, London
29. Messina JP, Walsh SJ (2001) 2.5D Morphogenesis: Modelling land-use and land-cover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazone. Plant Ecol 156:75-88
30. Millward HA (1980) Externality effects and the spatial association of land uses. Ontario Geograph 15:17-33
31. Mishan EJ (1969) Welfare economics: Ten introductory essays. New York, Random House
32. de Nijs T, Engelen G, White R, van Delden H, Uljee I (2001) De Leefomgevingsverkenner, Technische Documentatie, RIVM, Bilthoven (Report 408505007/2001)
33. O'Sullivan D, Torrens PM (2000) Cellular models of urban systems. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London (Paper 22)
34. Parker DC, Meretsky V (2004) Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 101:233-250
35. Pigou AC (1932) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London
36. Pontius RG Jr (2000) Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66(8):1011-1016
37. Pontius RG Jr, Huffaker D, Denman K (2004) Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecol Modell 179:445-461
38. RIKS (2003a) De Toekomst Aangekaart: Een integrale, ambtelijke zoektocht met de LeefOmgevings- Verkenner naar woon- en werklocaties in de provincie Utrecht. RIKS, Maastricht
39. RIKS (2003b) Map Comparison Kit: User manual. RIKS, Maastricht
40. RIKS (2004) Kalibratie van de LeefOmgevingsVerkenner: Eindrapport. RIKS, Maastricht
41. Roderigue JP (2004) Transport Geography on the Web: Chapter 7. Department of Economics and Geography, Hofstra University, New York
42. Rothenburg J (1967) Economic evaluation of urban renewal. Brookings Institution, Washington DC
43. Smith DM (1975) Patterns in human geography. David and Charles, Newton Abbot
44. Smith TE (1976) Spatial discounting and the gravity hypothesis. Reg Sci Urban Econ 6:331-356
45. Smith DM (1977) Human geography: A welfare approach. Edward Arnold, London
46. Smith CJ (1981) Residential proximity and community acceptance of the mentally ill. J Oper Psychiatry 12(1):2-12
47. van den Steen I (2002) Spatial Autocorrelation, Free University of Brussels, Belgium
48. Sui DZ, Zeng H (2001) Modelling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia's emerging Desakota regions: A case study in Shenzhen. Landscape Urban Plann 53(1-4):37-52
49. Tideman NT (1970) Land use control through administered compensation. Discussion Paper 59, Program on Regional and Urban Economics, Harvard University
50. Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, Supplement: Proceedings, International Geographical Union, Commission on Quantitative Methods 46:234-240
51. Tobler WR (1979) Cellular geography. In: Gale S, Olsson G (eds) Philosophy in geography. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 379-386
52. Torrens PM (2000) How cellular models of urban systems work: 1. Theory. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, Paper 28
53. Torrens PM (2001) Can Geocomputation Save Urban Simulation? Throw Some Agents into the Mixture, Simmer, and Wait... Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, Paper 32
54. Torrens PM, O'Sullivan D (2001) Editorial, CA and urban simulation: where do we go from here? Environ Plann B 28(2):163-168
55. Verburg PH, de Nijs TCM, van Ritsema Eck J, Visser H, de Jong K (2004) A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(6):667-690
56. Visser H (2004) The Map Comparison Kit: Methods, software and applications. Report 550002005/2004. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
57. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8:338-353