The value of triple antibody (34βE12 + p63 + AMACR) cocktail stain in radical prostatectomy specimens with crushed surgical margins

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 437-440

  Al Daoud, Najla ^a   Li, Gangyong ^b   Evans, Andrew J ^b   Van Der Kwast, Theodorus H ^b  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 METHYLACYL COENZYME A RACEMASE; ANTIBODY; CELL MARKER; HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT CYTOKERATIN PLUS P63 PLUS ALPHA METHYLACYL COENZYME A RACEMASE ANTIBODY; KERATIN; PROTEIN P63; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BASAL CELL; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KERATINS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RACEMASES AND EPIMERASES; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84862826746     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: 14724146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200533     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Anatomic site specific cancer and its impact on outcome after positive margins in organ-confined prostate radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997;50:733-9. (Pubitemid 27494995)
2. Eastham JA, Kurolwa K, Ohorl M, et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007;70:965.
3. Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the caPSURE database. J Urol 2000;163:1171.
4. Shikanov S, Song J, Royce C, et al. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009;182:139-44.
5. Van der Kwast TH, Bolla M, Van Poppel H, et al. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4178-86. (Pubitemid 47548556)
6. Yossepowitch O, Bjartell A, Eastham JA, et al. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. Eur Urol 2008;55:87.
7. Ekici S, Ayhan A, Erkan I, et al. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37:387-91. (Pubitemid 37463855)
8. van der Kwast TH, Collette L, Van Poppel H, et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimen. Virchows Arch 2006;449:428-34. (Pubitemid 44451317)
9. Evans AJ, Henry PC, Van der Kwast TH. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margins status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1503-12.
10. Jiang Z, Wu CL, Woda BA, et al. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase:a multi-institutional study of a new prostate cancer marker. Histopathology 2004;45:218-25. (Pubitemid 39294698)
11. Hameed O, Sublett J, Humphrey PA. Immunohistochemical stains for p63 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, versus a cocktail comprising both, in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma: a comparison of the immunohistochemical staining of 430 foci in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy tissues. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:579-87. (Pubitemid 40577866)
12. Chang SS, Cookson MS. Impact of positive surgical surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2006;68:249-52. (Pubitemid 44175518)
13. Tan PH, Cheng L, Srigley JR, et al. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins. Mod Pathol 2011;24:48-57.
14. Fleshner NE, Evans AJ, Chadwick K, et al. Clinical significane of the positive surgical margin based upon location, grade, and stage. Urol Oncol 2010;28:197-204.
15. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assissted laproscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007;178:2385-90. (Pubitemid 350052156)
16. Beach R, Gown AM, De Peralta-Venturina MN, et al. P504S immunohistochemical detection in 405 prostatic specimens including 376 18-gauge needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1588-96. (Pubitemid 35387221)
17. True L. Quality control in molecular immunohistochemistry. Histochem Cell Biol 2008;130:473-80.
18. Werner M, Chott A, Fabiano A, et al. Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohiastochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:1016-19. (Pubitemid 30430490)
19. Varma M, Linden MD, Amin MB. Effect of formalin fixation and epitope retrieval techniques on antibody 34betaE12 immunostaining of prostatic tissues. Mod Pathol 1999;12:472-8. (Pubitemid 29230607)
20. Zhou M, Shah R, Shen R, et al. Basal cell cocktail (34betaE12 + p63) improves the detection of prostate basal cells. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:365-71. (Pubitemid 36245802)