Chronic microstimulation of cat auditory cortex effective to evoke detection behaviors

Neuroscience

Volumn 206, Issue , 2012, Pages 81-88

  Wang, J ^a   Liu, Y ^a   Qin, L ^a,b   Chimoto, S ^a   Nakamoto, K ^a   Sato, Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex implant; Brain machine interface; Cat; Detection behavior; Intracranial microstimulation; Operant conditioning

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY CORTEX IMPLANT; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM PARAMETERS; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CATS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY;

EID: 84862826269     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Engineer C.T., Perez C.A., Chen Y.H., Carraway R.S., Reed A.C., Shetake J.A., et al. Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11:603-608.
2. Jackson A., Fetz E.E. Compact movable microwire array for long-term chronic unit recording in cerebral cortex of primates. J Neurophysiol 2007, 98:3109-3118.
3. Lim H.H., Lenarz T., Joseph G., Battmer R.D., Patrick J.F., Lenarz M. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results. Neuroscience 2008, 154:370-380.
4. Liu Y., Qin L., Zhang X., Dong C., Sato Y. Neural correlates of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in cats. Behav Brain Res 2010, 215:28-38.
5. Otto K.J., Rousche P.J., Kipke D.R. Cortical microstimulation in auditory cortex of rat elicits best-frequency dependent behaviors. J Neural Eng 2005, 2:42-51.
6. Otto K.J., Rousche P.J., Kipke D.R. Microstimulation in auditory cortex provides a substrate for detailed behaviors. Hear Res 2005, 210:112-117.
7. Penfield W., Perot P. The brain's record of auditory and visual experience. A final summary and discussion. Brain 1963, 86:595-696.
8. Qin L., Liu Y., Wang J., Li S., Sato Y. Neural and behavioral discrimination of sound duration by cats. J Neurosci 2009, 29:15650-15659.
9. Ronner S.F., Lee B.G. Excitation of visual cortex neurons by local intracortical microstimulation. Exp Neurol 1983, 81:376-395.
10. Rousche P.J., Normann R.A. Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1999, 7:56-68.
11. Rousche P.J., Otto K.J., Reilly M.P., Kipke D.R. Single electrode micro-stimulation of rat auditory cortex: an evaluation of behavioral performance. Hear Res 2003, 179:62-71.
12. Shannon R.V. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992, 39:424-426.
13. Wilks S.J., Richardson-Burns S.M., Hendricks J.L., Martin D.C., Otto K.J. Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a micro-neural interface material for electrostimulation. Front Neuroeng 2009, 2:7.
14. Wilson B.S., Dorman M.F. Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hear Res 2008, 242:3-21.
15. Yang Y., DeWeese M.R., Otazu1 G.H., Zador A.M. Millisecond-scale differences in neural activity in auditory cortex can drive decisions. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11:1262-1263.
16. Zhang X., Qin L., Liu Y., Dong C., Sato Y. Cat's behavioral sensitivity and cortical spatiotemporal responses to the sweep direction of frequency-modulated tones. Behav Brain Res 2011, 217:315-325.
17. Zhang X., Yang P., Cao Y., Qin L., Sato Y. Salicylate induced neural changes in the primary auditory cortex of awake cats. Neuroscience 2011, 172:232-245.