Consumer preferences for automobile energy-efficiency grades

Energy Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 446-451

  Koo, Yoonmo ^a   Kim, Chang Seob ^b   Hong, Junhee ^b   Choi, Ie Jung ^c   Lee, Jongsu ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Gachon University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Energy efficiency grade; Mixed logit; Mixed multiple discrete continuous extreme value

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE USAGE; CONSUMER BEHAVIORS; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; DISCRETE-CONTINUOUS EXTREME VALUES; EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICIES; ENERGY PRICES; MDCEV MODEL; MIXED LOGIT; POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS; REVEALED PREFERENCE;

SALES;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

AUTOMOBILE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; LOGIT ANALYSIS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION;

EID: 84862822776     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ahn J., Jeong G., Kim Y. A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: a multiple discrete-continuous choice approach. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:2091-2104.
2. Bhat C.R. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological 2005, 39:679-707.
3. Bhat C.R. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological 2008, 42:274-303.
4. Brownstone D., Bunch D.S., Train K. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological 2000, 34:315-338.
5. Ewing G., Sarigollu E. Assessing consumer preferences for clean-fuel vehicles: a discrete choice experiment. J. Public Policy Mark. 2000, 19:106-118.
6. Fiebig D.G., Keane M.P., Louviere J., Wasi N. The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Mark. Sci. 2010, 29:1-29.
7. Kim Y., Jeong G., Ahn J., Lee J.D. Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles in South Korea. Int. J. Automot. Technol. Manage. 2007, 7:327-342.
8. Korean Automobile Manufacturer Association http://www.kama.or.kr.
9. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice models. Frontiers of Econometrics 1973, Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremba (Ed.).
10. McFadden D., Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics 2000, 15:447-470.
11. Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1998, 80:647-657.
12. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press.
13. Wedel M., Kamakura W., Arora N., Bemmaor A., Chiang J., Elrod T., Johnson R., Lenk P., Neslin S., Stig Poulsen C. Discrete and continuous representations of unobserved heterogeneity in choice modeling. Mark. Lett. 1999, 10:219-232.
14. Wiel S., McMahon J.E. Energy-Efficiency Labels and Standards: A Guidebook for Appliances, Equipment, and Lighting 2005, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California. second edition.