Measurement of generation-dependent proliferation rates and death rates during mouse erythroid progenitor cell differentiation

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 81 A, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 382-389

  Akbarian, Vahe ^a,b   Wang, Weijia ^a,b   Audet, Julie ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester; Cell differentiation; Cell division; CFSE; Erythropoiesis; Red blood cells

Indexed keywords

5 (6) CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; 5-(6)-CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; ERYTHROPOIETIN; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; STEM CELL FACTOR; SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; ERYTHROCYTE; ERYTHROID PRECURSOR CELL; ERYTHROPOIESIS; FEMALE; LIVER; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PREGNANCY;

ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ERYTHROCYTES; ERYTHROID PRECURSOR CELLS; ERYTHROPOIESIS; ERYTHROPOIETIN; FEMALE; FLUORESCEINS; LIVER; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PREGNANCY; STEM CELL FACTOR; SUCCINIMIDES;

EID: 84862809576     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22031     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lyons AB, Parish CR. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1994; 171: 131-137.
2. Quah BJ, Warren HS, Parish CR. Monitoring lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and in vivo with the intracellular fluorescent dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 2049-2056.
3. Roederer M. Interpretation of cellular proliferation data: Avoid the panglossian. Cytometry Part A 2011; 79A: 95-101.
4. Nordon RE, Ginsberg SS, Eaves CJ. High-resolution cell division tracking demonstrates the FLt3-ligand-dependence of human marrow CD34+CD38- cell production in vitro. Br J Haematol 1997; 98: 528-539.
5. Oostendorp RA, Audet J, Eaves CJ. High-resolution tracking of cell division suggests similar cell cycle kinetics of hematopoietic stem cells stimulated in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2000; 95: 855-862.
6. Case J, Rice A, Wood J, Gaudry L, Vowels M, Nordon RE. Characterization of cytokine interactions by flow cytometry and factorial analysis. Cytometry 2001; 43: 69-81.
7. Ko KH, Odell R, Nordon RE. Analysis of cell differentiation by division tracking cytometry. Cytometry Part A 2007; 71A: 773-782.
8. Nordon RE, Nakamura M, Ramirez C, Odell R. Analysis of growth kinetics by division tracking. Immunol Cell Biol 1999; 77: 523-529.
9. Ganusov VV, Pilyugin SS, de Boer RJ, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R, Antia R. Quantifying cell turnover using CFSE data. J Immunol Methods 2005; 298: 183-200.
10. De Boer RJ, Ganusov VV, Milutinovic D, Hodgkin PD, Perelson AS. Estimating lymphocyte division and death rates from CFSE data. Bull Math Biol 2006; 68: 1011-1031.
11. Hawkins ED, Hommel M, Turner ML, Battye FL, Markham JF, Hodgkin PD. Measuring lymphocyte proliferation, survival and differentiation using CFSE time-series data. Nat Protoc 2007; 2: 2057-2067.
12. Zilman A, Ganusov VV, Perelson AS. Stochastic models of lymphocyte proliferation and death. PLoS One 2010; 5.
13. Nordon RE, Ko KH, Odell R, Schroeder T. Multi-type branching models to describe cell differentiation programs. J Theor Biol 2011; 277: 7-18.
14. Smith JA, Martin L. Do cells cycle? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973; 70: 1263-1267.
15. Bernard S, Pujo-Menjouet L, Mackey MC. Analysis of cell kinetics using a cell division marker: Mathematical modeling of experimental data. Biophys J 2003; 84: 3414-3424.
16. Pilyugin SS, Ganusov VV, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R, Antia R. The rescaling method for quantifying the turnover of cell populations. J Theor Biol 2003; 225: 275-283.
17. Hersh RT, Kitos PA. Is G1 normally distributed? J Theor Biol 1980; 86: 117-122.
18. Flygare J, Rayon Estrada V, Shin C, Gupta S, Lodish HF. HIF1alpha synergizes with glucocorticoids to promote BFU-E progenitor self-renewal. Blood 2011; 117: 3435-3444.
19. Giarratana MC, Kobari L, Lapillonne H, Chalmers D, Kiger L, Cynober T, Marden MC, Wajcman H, Douay L. Ex vivo generation of fully mature human red blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23: 69-74.
20. Perfetto SP, Ambrozak D, Nguyen R, Chattopadhyay P, Roederer M. Quality assurance for polychromatic flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2006; 1: 1522-1530.
21. Miller CL, Dykstra B, Eaves CJ. Characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Curr Protoc Immunol 2008;Chapter 22:Unit 22B.2.
22. Wu H, Liu X, Jaenisch R, Lodish HF. Generation of committed erythroid BFU-E and CFU-E progenitors does not require erythropoietin or the erythropoietin receptor. Cell 1995; 83: 59-67.
23. Ruskeepää H. Mathematica navigator:mathematics, statistics, and graphics. San Diego: Elsevier; 2009.
24. Luzyanina T, Mrusek S, Edwards JT, Roose D, Ehl S, Bocharov G. Computational analysis of CFSE proliferation assay. J Math Biol 2007; 54: 57-89.
25. Zhang J, Socolovsky M, Gross AW, Lodish HF. Role of Ras signaling in erythroid differentiation of mouse fetal liver cells: Functional analysis by a flow cytometry-based novel culture system. Blood 2003; 102: 3938-3946.
26. Nijhof W, Wierenga PK. Isolation and characterization of the erythroid progenitor cell: CFU-E. J Cell Biol 1983; 96: 386-392.
27. Terszowski G, Waskow C, Conradt P, Lenze D, Koenigsmann J, Carstanjen D, Horak I, Rodewald HR. Prospective isolation and global gene expression analysis of the erythrocyte colony-forming unit (CFU-E). Blood 2005; 105: 1937-1945.
28. Revy P, Sospedra M, Barbour B, Trautmann A. Functional antigen-independent synapses formed between T cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 925-931.
29. Asquith B, Debacq C, Florins A, Gillet N, Sanchez-Alcaraz T, Mosley A, Willems L. Quantifying lymphocyte kinetics in vivo using carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE). Proc Biol Sci 2006; 273: 1165-1171.
30. Wang W, Horner DN, Chen WL, Zandstra PW, Audet J. Synergy between erythropoietin and stem cell factor during erythropoiesis can be quantitatively described without co-signaling effects. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008; 99: 1261-1272.
31. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009. xvii, pp 656.
32. Eshghi S, Vogelezang MG, Hynes RO, Griffith LG, Lodish HF. Alpha4beta1 integrin and erythropoietin mediate temporally distinct steps in erythropoiesis: Integrins in red cell development. J Cell Biol 2007; 177: 871-880.
33. Rhodes MM, Kopsombut P, Bondurant MC, Price JO, Koury MJ. Adherence to macrophages in erythroblastic islands enhances erythroblast proliferation and increases erythrocyte production by a different mechanism than erythropoietin. Blood 2008; 111: 1700-1708.
34. Banjerdpongchai D, Dejnakarintra M. A novel numerical convolution of rational laplace transform inversion. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems, Chiangmai, Thailand; 1998. pp 715-718.
35. Douay L, Andreu G. Ex vivo production of human red blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells: What is the future in transfusion? Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21: 91-100.