Assessment of axial length measurements in mouse eyes

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 296-303

  Park, Han Na ^a   Qazi, Yureeda ^a   Tan, Christopher ^b   Jabbar, Seema B ^a   Cao, Yang ^a   Schmid, Gregor ^a   Pardue, MacHelle T ^a,b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

axial length; low coherence interferometry; myopia; ocular biometry; partial coherence interferometry; refractive development; spectral domain optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

AXIAL LENGTH; LOW COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; MYOPIA; OCULAR BIOMETRY; PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; REFRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT; SPECTRAL DOMAIN-OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY;

ALIGNMENT; INSTRUMENTS; MAMMALS; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; OPTICAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; STRAIN MEASUREMENT;

INTERFACES (COMPUTER);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; C57BL MOUSE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; EYE AXIS LENGTH; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; MYOPIA; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYOPIA; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 84862803988     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31824529e5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL, III. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1632-9.
2. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100:684-91.
3. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Chew SJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2486-94.
4. Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G, Zhang X, Chia A, Young TL, Rose KA, Mitchell P, Saw SM. Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:997-1000.
5. Siegwart JT, Jr., Norton TT. Perspective: How might emmetropization and genetic factors produce myopia in normal eyes? Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:365-72.
6. Meng W, Butterworth J, Malecaze F, Calvas P. Axial length of myopia: A review of current research. Ophthalmologica 2011;225: 127-34.
7. Feldkamper M, Schaeffel F. Interactions of genes and environment in myopia. Dev Ophthalmol 2003;37:34-49.
8. Pardue MT, Faulkner AE, Fernandes A, Yin H, Schaeffel F, Williams RW, Pozdeyev N, Iuvone PM. High susceptibility to experimental myopia in a mouse model with a retinal on pathway defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:706-12.
9. Barathi VA, Boopathi VG, Yap EP, Beuerman RW. Two models of experimental myopia in the mouse. Vision Res 2008;48:904-16.
10. Schaeffel F, Burkhardt E, Howland HC, Williams RW. Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:99-110.
11. Zhou X, Shen M, Xie J, Wang J, Jiang L, Pan M, Qu J, Lu F. The development of the refractive status and ocular growth in C57BL/6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5208-14.
12. Schippert R, Burkhardt E, Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F. Relative axial myopia in Egr-1 (ZENK) knockout mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:11-7.
13. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Res 2004;44:1857-67.
14. Wisard J, Chrenek MA, Wright C, Dalal N, Pardue MT, Boatright JH, Nickerson JM. Non-contact measurement of linear external dimensions of the mouse eye. J Neurosci Methods 2010;187:156-66.
15. Schmid GF, Papastergiou GI, Nickla DL, Riva CE, Lin T, Stone RA, Laties AM. Validation of laser Doppler interferometric measurements in vivo of axial eye length and thickness of fundus layers in chicks. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:691-6.
16. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. In vivo biometry in the mouse eye with low coherence interferometry. Vision Res 2004;44:2445-56.
17. Faulkner AE, Kim MK, Iuvone PM, Pardue MT. Head-mounted goggles for murine form deprivation myopia. J Neurosci Methods 2007;161:96-100.
18. Artal P, Herreros de Tejada P, Munoz Tedo C, Green DG. Retinal image quality in the rodent eye. Vis Neurosci 1998;15:597-605.
19. Wojtkowski M, Kowalczyk A, Leitgeb R, Fercher AF. Full range complex spectral optical coherence tomography technique in eye imaging. Opt Lett 2002;27:1415-7.
20. Ho J, Castro DP, Castro LC, Chen Y, Liu J, Mattox C, Krishnan C, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS, Duker JS. Clinical assessment of mirror artifacts in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3714-20.
21. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307-17.
22. Tsinopoulos IT, Tsaousis KT, Symeonidis C, Chalvatzis N, Dimitrakos SA. Repeatability and reproducibility of a-scan biometry quantitative findings. Curr Eye Res 2009;34:447-53.
23. Tejedor J, de la Villa P. Refractive changes induced by form deprivation in the mouse eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:32-6.
24. Tkatchenko TV, Shen Y, Tkatchenko AV. Analysis of postnatal eye development in the mouse with high-resolution small animal magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:21-7.
25. Smith EL, III, Hung LF, Huang J, Blasdel TL, Humbird TL, Bockhorst KH. Effects of optical defocus on refractive development in monkeys: Evidence for local, regionally selective mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:3864-73.
26. Schmid GF. Association between retinal steepness and central myopic shift in children. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:684-90.