|
Volumn 1229, Issue , 2012, Pages 274-279
|
Is pulsed electric field still effective for RNA separation in capillary electrophoresis?
|
Author keywords
Capillary electrophoresis; DNA; Hydroxyethylcellulose; Pulsed field capillary electrophoresis; RNA
|
Indexed keywords
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT;
DNA STRANDS;
HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE;
MODULATION DEPTH;
MOLECULE SIZES;
POLYMER CONCENTRATIONS;
PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD;
PULSED FIELDS;
PULSED FREQUENCY;
RESONANCE FREQUENCIES;
SEPARATION PERFORMANCE;
CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS;
DNA;
ELECTRIC FIELDS;
ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY;
METABOLISM;
SEPARATION;
UREA;
RNA;
HYDROXYETHYLCELLULOSE;
POLYMER;
RNA;
ARTICLE;
CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS;
CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS);
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT;
DENATURATION;
FREQUENCY MODULATION;
GENOMIC FRAGMENT;
HEATING;
MOLECULAR SIZE;
PLATE COUNT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD;
RNA ANALYSIS;
RNA ISOLATION;
SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;
ACETIC ACID;
CELLULOSE;
DNA;
ELECTROPHORESIS, CAPILLARY;
ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, PULSED-FIELD;
PARTICLE SIZE;
RNA;
UREA;
|
EID: 84862793945
PISSN: 00219673
EISSN: 18733778
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.056 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (33)
|