A combined brain-computer interface based on P300 potentials and motion-onset visual evoked potentials

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 265-276

  Jin, Jing ^a   Allison, Brendan Z ^b   Wang, Xingyu ^a   Neuper, Christa ^a,c  

^a School of Information Science and Engineering   (China)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Adaptive3; Brain computer interface; Changing stimuli; Event related potential; Motion onset visual evoked potentials; P300 potential

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; CHINESE; COLOR; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION ONSET VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BRAIN; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862777243     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Acqualaqna L., Treder M.S., Schreuder M., Blankertz B. A novel brain-computer interface based on the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 2010:2686-2689.
2. Allison B.Z., Pineda J.A. ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: Implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003, 11:110-113.
3. Allison B.Z., Wolpaw E.W., Wolpaw J.R. Brain-computer interface systems: progress and prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007, 4:463-474.
4. Allison BZ, Brunner C, Grissmann S, Altstatter C, Wagner I, Neuper C. A hybrid ERD/SSVEP BCI for continuous simultaneous two dimensional cursor control, submitted for publication.
5. Allison B.Z., Luth T., Valbuena D., Teymourian A., Volosyak I., Graser A. BCI demographics: how many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI?. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010, 18:107-116.
6. Barthélemy F.V., Perrinet L.U., Castet E., Masson G.S. Dynamics of distributed 1D and 2D motion representations for short-latency ocular following. Vision Res 2008, 48:501-522.
7. Birbaumer N., Cohen L.G. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol 2007, 15:621-636.
8. Brunner P., Joshil S., Briskin S., Wolpaw J.R., Bischof H., Schalk G. Does the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?. J Neural Eng 2010, 7:056013.
9. Cameron A.C., Windmeijer F.A.G. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econometr 1997, 77:329-342.
10. Celesia G.G., Peachey N.S. Visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields 2004, 1017-1043. Williams and Wilkins. E. Niedermeyer, F.H.L. da Silva (Eds.).
11. Croft R.J., Barry R.J. Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiol Clin 2000, 30:5-19.
12. Dal Seno B., Matteucci M., Mainardil L. Online detection of P300 and error potentials in a BCI speller. Comput Intell Neurosci 2010, 307254.
13. Duncan C.C., Barry R.J., Connolly J.F., Fischer C., Michie P.T., Naatanen R., et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin. Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1883-1908.
14. Fazel-Rezai R. Human error in P300 speller paradigm for brain-computer interface. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE EMBS 2007, 2516-2519.
15. Farwell L.A., Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988, 70:510-523.
16. Frye G.E., Hauser C.K., Townsend G., Sellers E.W. Suppressing flashes of items surrounding targets during calibration of a P300-based brain-computer interface improves performance. J Neural Eng 2011, 8:025024.
17. Guo F., Hong B., Gao X., Gao S. A brain-computer interface using motion-onset visual evoked potential. J Neural Eng 2008, 5:011.
18. Hong B., Guo F., Liu T., Gao S. N200-speller using motion-onset visual response. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1658-1666.
19. Hoffmann U., Vesin J.M., Ebrahimi T., Diserens K. An empirical Bayesian framework for brain computer interface. J Neurosci Meth 2008, 167:115-125.
20. Jansen B.H., Allam A., Kota P., Lachance K., Osho A., Sundarean K. An exploratory study of factors affecting single trial P300 detection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51:975-978.
21. Jin J., Allison B.Z., Brunner C., Wang B., Wang X., Zhang J., et al. P300 Chinese input system based on Bayesian LDA. Biomed Tech 2010, 55:5-18.
22. Jin J., Horki P., Brunner C., Wang X., Neuper C., Pfurtscheller G. A new P300 stimulus presentation pattern for EEG-based spelling systems. Biomed Tech 2010, 55:203-210.
23. Jin J., Allison B.Z., Sellers E.W., Brunner C., Horki P., Wang X., et al. Optimized stimulus presentation patterns for an event-related potential EEG-based brain computer interface. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011, 49:181-191.
24. Jin J., Allison B.Z., Sellers E.W., Brunner C., Horki P., Wang X., et al. An adaptive P300-based control system. J Neural Eng 2011, 8:036006.
25. Kaufmann T, Hammer EM, Kübler A. ERPs Contributing to Classification in the P300 BCI. 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference.Graz, Austria, 2011a; 136-9.
26. Kaufmann T., Schulz S.M., Grünzinger C., Kübler A. Flahing characters with famous faces improves ERP-Based brain-computer interface performance. J Neural Eng 2011, 8:056016.
27. Kennedy P.R., Adams K.D. A decision tree for brain-computer interface devices. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003, 11:148-150.
28. Kolev V.H., Demiralp T., Yordanova J., Ademoglu A., Isoglu-Alka U. Time-frequency analysis reveals multiple functional components during oddball P300. NeuroReport 1997, 8:2061-2065.
29. Kübler A., Kotchoubey B., Kraiser J., Wolpaw J.R. Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked-in. Psychol Bull 2001, 127:358-375.
30. Lei X., Yang P., Yap D. An efficient P300-based brain-computer interface for disabled subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009, 17:521-529.
31. Liu T., Goldberg L., Gao S., Hong B. An online brain-computer interface using non-flashing visual evoked potentials. J Neural Eng 2010, 7:036003.
32. Mak N.J., Wolpaw J.R. Clinical application of brain-computer interface: current state and future prospects. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2009, 2:187-199.
33. Martens S.M.M., Hill N.J., Farquhar J., Schölkopf B. Overlap and refractory effects in a brain-computer interface speller based on the visual P300 event-related potential. J Neural Eng 2009, 6:026003.
34. McFarland D.J., Sarnacki W.A., Townsend G., Vaughan T., Wolpaw J.R. The P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI): effects of stimulus rate. Clin Neurophysiol 2011, 122:731-737.
35. Muller M.M., Hillyard S. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention. Clin Neurophysiol 2000, 111:1544-1552.
36. Niedermeyer E., Lopes da Silva F. Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. Electroencephalography 2005, Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
37. Neumann N., Kübler A. Training locked-in patients: a challenge for the use of brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003, 11:169-172.
38. Omoto S., Kuroiwa Y., Li M., Doi H., Shimamura M., Kovano S., et al. Modulation of event-related potentials in normal human subjects by visual divided attention to spatial and color factors. Neurosci Lett 2001, 5:198-202.
39. Polich J., Comerchero M.D. P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topogr 2003, 15:141-152.
40. Regan D. Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic field in science and medicine 1989, Elsevier Pubs, New York.
41. Ryan D., Gates N.A., Colwell K., Throckmorton S., Collins L., Winnen K.A.M., et al. Improving brain-computer interface performance: giving the P300 speller some color. Program No. 593.01. 2011 Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2011, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
42. Scull L.A., Feldman S.M., Vaughan T.M., Sellers E.W., Mccane L., Zeitlin D., et al. P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) use by people with ALS: effects of different stimulus types and user strategies. Program No. 594.15. 2011 Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2011, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
43. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. Asolution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:695-703.
44. Sellers E.W., Donchin E. A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:538-548.
45. Sheliga B.M., FitzGinnon E.J., Miles F.A. Human ocular following: evidence that responses to large-field stimuli are limited by local and global inhibitory influences. Progr Brain Res 2008, 171:237-243.
46. Shishkin S.L., Ganin I.P., Kaplan A.Y. Event-related potentials in a moving matrix modification of the P300 brain-computer interface paradigm. Neurosci Lett 2011, 496:95-99.
47. Skrandies W., Jedynak A., Kleiser R. Scalp distribution components of brain activity evoked by visual motion stimuli. Exp Brain Res 1998, 122:62-70.
48. Takano K., Komatsu T., Hata N., Nakajima Y., Kansaku K. Visual stimuli for the P300 brain-computer interface: a comparison of white/gray and green/blue flicker matrices. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:1562-1566.
49. Torriente I., Valdes-Sosa M., Ramirez D., Bobes M.A. Visual evoked potentials related to motion-onset are modulated by attention. Vision Res 1999, 39:4122-4139.
50. Townsend G., LaPallo B.K., Boulay C.B., Krusienski D.J., Frye G.E., Hauser C.K., et al. A novel P300-based brain-computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: moving beyond rows and columns. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:1109-1120.
51. Treder M.S., Blankertz B. (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface. Behav Brain Funct 2010, 28:28.
52. Wolpaw J.R., Birbaumer N., McFarland D.J., Pfurtscheller G., Vaughan T.M. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 2002, 113:767-791.