Event-related potentials in a moving matrix modification of the P300 brain-computer interface paradigm

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 496, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 95-99

  Shishkin, Sergei L ^a,b   Ganin, Ilya P ^a,b   Kaplan, Alexander Ya ^a,b  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY MEPHI   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Brain computer interface (BCI); Electroencephalogram (EEG); Event related potentials (ERP); Moving objects perception; N1 potential; P300 potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79955730461     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.089     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bell C.J., Shenoy P., Chalodhorn R., Rao R.P. Control of a humanoid robot by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. J. Neural Eng. 2008, 5:214-220.
2. Brunner P., Joshi S., Briskin S., Wolpaw J.R., Bischof H., Schalk G. Does the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?. J. Neural Eng. 2010, 7:056013.
3. Burr D.C., Morrone M.C., Ross J. Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature 1994, 371:511-513.
4. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res. 1996, 36:1827-1837.
5. Farwell L.A., Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 70:510-523.
6. S. Frenzel, E. Neubert, Is the P300 speller independent? arXiv:1006.3688v1 [cs.HC] (published 06/2010).
7. Guger C., Daban S., Sellers E., Holzner C., Krausz G., Carabalona R., Gramatica F., Edlinger G. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?. Neurosci. Lett. 2009, 462:94-98.
8. Hong B., Guo F., Liu T., Gao X., Gao S. N200-speller using motion-onset visual response. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120:1658-1666.
9. Khurana B., Kowler E. Shared attentional control of smooth eye movement and perception. Vision Res. 1987, 27:1603-1618.
10. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:557-577.
11. Kramer A.F., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Hum. Factors 1983, 25:597-621.
12. Krusienski D.J., Sellers E.W., McFarland D.J., Vaughan T.M., Wolpaw J.R. Toward enhanced P300 speller performance. J. Neurosci. Methods 2008, 167:15-21.
13. Lencer R., Trillenberg P. Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of smooth pursuit in humans. Brain Cogn. 2008, 68:219-228.
14. Li Y., Long J., Yu T., Yu Z., Wang C., Zhang H., Guan C. An EEG-based BCI system for 2-D cursor control by combining mu/beta rhythm and P300 potential. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57:2495-2505.
15. Lovejoy L.P., Fowler G.A., Krauzlis R.J. Spatial allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Res. 2009, 49:1275-1285.
16. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:4-18.
18. Nijholt A., Reuderink B., Bos D.O. Turning shortcomings into challenges: brain-computer interfaces for games. INTETAIN 2009, LNICST 9 2009, 153-168. Springer, Berlin. A. Nijholt, D. Reidsma, H. Hondorp (Eds.).
19. Rebsamen B., Guan C., Zhang H., Wang C., Teo C., Ang M.H., Burdet E. A brain controlled wheelchair to navigate in familiar environments. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng. 2010, 18:590-598.
20. Schütz A.C., Delipetkos E., Braun D.I., Kerzel D., Gegenfurtner K.R. Temporal contrast sensitivity during smooth pursuit eye movements. J. Vision 2007, 7:1-15.
21. Sellers E.W., Krusienski D.J., McFarland D.J., Wolpaw J.R. Non-invasive brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center. Towards Brain-Computer Interfacing 2007, 31-42. MIT Press. G. Dornhege, J. del R. Millán, T. Hinterberger, D.J. McFarland, K.-R. Müller (Eds.).
22. Sellers E.W., Vaughan T.M., Wolpaw J.R. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2010, 11:449-455.
23. Shishkin S.L., Basyul I.A., Kaplan A.Y. Distractors in BCI: can harmful commands be activated automatically?. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(Suppl. 1):S121.
24. Shishkin S.L., Ganin I.P., Basyul I.A., Zhigalov A.Yu., Kaplan A.Ya. N1 wave in the P300 BCI is not sensitive to the physical characteristics of stimuli. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2009, 8:471-485.
25. Treder M.S., Blankertz B. (C)overt attention and visual speller design in an ERP-based brain-computer interface. Behav. Brain Funct. 2010, 6:28.
26. van Donkelaar P., Drew A.S. The allocation of attention during smooth pursuit eye movements. Progr. in Brain Res. 2002, vol. 140:267-277. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
27. Wascher E., Hoffmann S., Sänger J., Grosjean M. Visuo-spatial processing and the N1 component of the ERP. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:1270-1277.
28. Wolpaw J.R., Birbaumer N., McFarland D.J., Pfurtscheller G., Vaughan T.M. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113:767-791.