Improving advance care planning by accommodating family preferences

Journal of Palliative Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 481-489

  Hines, Stephen C ^a   Glover, Jacqueline J ^b   Babrow, Austin S ^c   Holley, Jean L ^d   Badzek, Laurie A ^e   Moss, Alvin H ^b  

^a Delmarva Foundation for Medical Care   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^e WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FAMILY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS UNITS, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; LEGAL GUARDIANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0035667020     PISSN: 10966218     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/109662101753381629     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?
2. Why I don‘t have a living will
3. Beyond advance directives - Health care surrogate laws
4. Family surrogate laws: A necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney
5. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill
6. The application of health care surrogate laws to older populations: How good a match?
7. Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patients‘ perspective
8. A new model of advance care planning: Observations from people with HIV
9. Communication about advance directives: Are patients sharing information with physicians?
10. Hemodialysis patients‘ practices regarding family-based advance care planning
11. Families‘ roles in advance directives
12. Standards for surrogate decision making: What the elderly want
13. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of elderly persons regarding living wills
14. Proxy decision making for incompetent patients: An ethical and empirical analysis
15. Myth of Substituted judgment: Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable
16. Decision-making ability and advance directive preferences in nursing home patients and proxies
17. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses
18. Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions
19. Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies
20. Physicians‘ and spouses‘ predictions of elderly patients? resuscitation preferences
21. Substituted judgment: How accurate are proxy predictions?
22. Spousal understanding of patient quality of life: Implications for surrogate decisions
23. Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies
24. All in the family: Extended autonomy and expections in surrogate health care decision making
25. A comparison of patient, family, and physician assessments of the value of medical intensive care
26. Surrogates‘ prediction of seriously ill patients‘ resuscitation preferences
27. Failure of advance care planning to elicit patients‘ preferences for withdrawal from dialysis
28. Quality end-of-life care: Patients‘ perspectives
29. A new model of advance care planning: Observations from people with HIV
30. Advance directives and withdrawal of dialysis in the United States, Germany, and Japan
31. Advance care planning as a process: Structuring the discussions in practice
32. Module 1: Advance care planning