Effects of microrough and hierarchical hybrid micro/nanorough surface implants on osseointegration in ovariectomized rats: A longitudinal in vivo microcomputed tomography evaluation

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2159-2167

  Gao, Yuan ^a,b   Li, Yongfeng ^a   Xiao, Jianrui ^c   Xu, Lixian ^a   Hu, Kaijin ^a   Kong, Liang ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Department of Stomatology   (China)

^c The 252 Hospital of Chinese PLA   (China)

Author keywords

implant; micro nanorough; osseointegration; osteoporosis; surface roughness

Indexed keywords

BONE VOLUME; DISTAL FEMURS; FEMALE RAT; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; IN-VIVO; MICRO CT; MICRO/NANOROUGH; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC; PULL-OUT FORCE; PULL-OUT TEST; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; SURFACE IMPLANT; TIME POINTS;

BONE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); RATS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

TITANIUM DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE STRUCTURE; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FORCE; HYBRID; IN VIVO STUDY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; OVARIECTOMY; RAT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FEMUR; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; NANOPARTICLES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OVARIECTOMY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STAINING AND LABELING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84862758199     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34129     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Yang J, Xiang HJ,. A three-dimensional finite element study on the biomechanical behavior of an FGBM dental implant in surrounding bone. J Biomech 2007; 40: 2377-2385.
2. Amorim MA, Takayama L, Jorgetti V, Pereira RM,. Comparative study of axial and femoral bone mineral density and parameters of mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 703-709.
3. Becker W, Hujoel PP, Becker BE, Willingham H,. Osteoporosis and implant failure: An exploratory case-control study. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 625-631.
4. Dao TT, Anderson JD, Zarb GA,. Is osteoporosis a risk for osseointegration of dental implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 137-144.
5. Kasugai S,. Dental implant treatment to osteoporosis patients. Clin Calcium 2006; 16: 348-353.
6. Kim TI, Jang JH, Kim HW, Knowles JC, Ku Y,. Biomimetic approach to dental implants. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14: 2201-2211.
7. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J,. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 381-392.
8. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A,. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO(2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 128-134.
9. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B,. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 15-22.
10. Li Y, Zou S, Wang D, Feng G, Bao C, Hu J,. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on titanium implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 3266-3273.
11. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y,. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844-854.
12. Ogawa T, Nishimura I,. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 566-570.
13. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG,. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 529-533.
14. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ,. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4175-4183.
15. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S,. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 59-68.
16. Xiao J, Zhou H, Zhao L, Sun Y, Guan S, Liu B, Kong L,. The effect of hierarchical micro/nano surface titanium implant on osseointegration in ovariectomized sheep. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 1907-1913.
17. Kanis JA, Melton LJ III, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N,. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1137-1141.
18. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U,. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Brnemark dental implants: A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 142-146.
19. Grassi S, Piattelli A, Ferrari DS, Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Iezzi G, Shibli JA,. Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone. J Oral Implantol 2007; 33: 8-12.
20. Shibli JA, Grassi S, de Figueiredo LC, Feres M, Marcantonio E Jr, Iezzi G, Piattelli A,. Influence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: A histological study in human jaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 80: 377-385.
21. Mendonça G, Mendonça DB, Arago FJ, Cooper LF,. Advancing dental implant surface technology: From micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3822-3835.
22. Waarsing JH, Day JS, van der Linden JC, Ederveen AG, Spanjers C, De Clerck N, Sasov A, Verhaar JA, Weinans H,. Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: A novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone 2004; 34: 163-169.
23. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S,. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 11-19.
24. Zhao L, Mei S, Chu PK, Zhang Y, Wu Z,. The influence of hierarchical hybrid micro/nano-textured titanium surface with titania nanotubes on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 5072-5082.
25. Lijie Zhang, Thomas J,. Webster. Nanotechnology and nanomaterials: Promises for improved tissue regeneration. Nano Today 2009; 4: 66 a - 80.
26. Hansson S, Norton M,. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999; 32: 829-836.
27. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001; 7: 291-301.
28. 2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 5319-5329.
29. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A,. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 659-666.
30. Farley JR, Wergedal JE, Baylink DJ,. Fluoride directly stimulates proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity of bone-forming cells. Science 1983; 222: 330-332.
31. 2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 926-936.
32. Anderson PA, Copenhaver JC, Tencer AF, Clark JM,. Response of cortical bone to local controlled release of sodium fluoride: The effect of implant insertion site. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 890-901.
33. Sundfeldt M, Persson J, Swanpalmer J, Wennerberg A, Kärrholm J, Johansson CB, Carlsson LV,. Does sodium fluoride in bone cement affect implant fixation. Part II: Evaluation of the effect of sodium fluoride additions to acrylic bone cement and the fixation of titanium implants in ovariectomized rabbits. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002; 13: 1045-1050.
34. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Haugen HJ,. Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: Surface characterization and in vivo performance. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 88: 581-588.
35. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Rubert M, Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE,. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 736-742.
36. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P,. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng Phys 1998; 20: 92-102.
37. David V, Laroche N, Boudignon B, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Ruegsegger P, Vico L,. Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of bone architecture alterations in hindlimb-unloaded female rats using novel three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1622-1631.
38. Boyd SK, Davison P, Müller R, Gasser JA,. Monitoring individual morphological changes over time in ovariectomized rats by in vivo micro-computed tomography. Bone 2006; 39: 854-862.