The relative contribution of local habitat and landscape context to metapopulation processes: A dynamic occupancy modeling approach

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 581-589

  Frey, Sarah J K ^a   Strong, Allan M ^b   McFarland, Kent P ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c Vermont Center for Ecostudies   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EXTINCTION RISK; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT TYPE; LANDSCAPE; METAPOPULATION; PASSERINE; PATCH USE; VULNERABILITY;

CATHARUS BICKNELLI; TURDIDAE;

EID: 84862755854     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06936.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andren H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71: 355-366.
2. Armstrong D. P. 2005. Integrating the metapopulation and habitat paradigms for understanding broad-scale declines of species. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1402-1410.
3. Betts M. G. et al. 2006. Independent effects of fragmentation on forest songbirds: an organism-based approach. Ecol. Appl. 16: 1076-1089.
4. Betts M. G. et al. 2007. Thresholds in songbird occurrence in relation to landscape structure. Conserv. Biol. 21: 1046-1058.
5. BirdLife International 2000. Threatened birds of the world. - Cambridge and Lynx Editcions.
6. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer.
7. Cottam G. and Curtis J. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37: 451-460.
8. Donovan T. et al. 1995. Reproductive success of migratory birds in habitat sources and sinks. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1380-1395.
9. ESRI 2005. ArcGIS, ver. 9.1. - Environmental Systems Research Inst., Redlands, CA.
10. Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487-515.
11. Fleishman E. et al. 2002. Assessing the roles of patch quality, area, and isolation in predicting metapopulation dynamics. Conserv. Biol. 16: 706-716.
12. Gaston K. J. 1990. Patterns in geographical ranges in species. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 65: 105-129.
13. Guenette J. S. and Villard M. A. 2005. Thresholds in forest bird response to habitat alteration as quantitative targets for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1168-1180.
14. Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
15. Hanski K. and Ovaskainen O. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64: 119-127.
16. Hart J. A. and Lambert J. D. 2007. Mountian birdwatch 2006: final report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Vermont Inst. of Natural Science Technical Report 07-03.
17. Hastings A. and Harrison S. 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and genetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 167-188.
18. Hines J. E. 2006. Presence2 - software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters. - USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA.
19. Lambert J. D. et al. 2005. A practical model of Bicknell's thrush distribution in the northeastern United States. Wilson Bull. 117: 1-11.
20. MacArthur R. H. and Wilson E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. - Princeton Univ. Press.
21. MacKenzie D. et al. 2003. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84: 2200-2207.
22. Midgley G. F. et al. 2010. BioMove - an integrated platform simulating the dynamic response of species to environmental change. Ecography 33: 612-616.
23. Moilanen A. 2002. Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application. Oikos 96: 516-530.
24. Moilanen A. and Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
25. Mortelliti A. et al. 2010. The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research. Oecologia 163: 535-547.
26. Mustin K. et al. 2009. The dynamics of climate-induced range shifting; perspectives from simulation modelling. Oikos 118: 131-137.
27. Opdam P. 1991. Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecol. 5: 93-106.
28. Ott R. L. and Longnecker M. 2001. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. - Duxbury.
29. Prugh L. R. et al. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 20770-20775.
30. Renfrew R. B. and Ribic C. A. 2008. Multi-scale models of grassland passerine abundance in a fragmented system in Wisconsin. Landscape Ecol. 23: 181-193.
31. Rich T. D. et al. 2004. Partners in Flight North American Landbird Conservation Plan. - Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
32. Rimmer C. C. et al. 2001. Bicknell's thrush (Catharus bicknelli). - In: Poole A. and Gill F. (eds), The Birds of North America. The Birds of North America.
33. Schooley R. L. and Branch L. C. 2007. Spatial heterogeneity in habitat quality and cross-scale interactions in metapopulations. Ecosystems 10: 846-853.
34. Schooley R. L. and Branch L. C. 2009. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal. Ecol. Appl. 19: 1708-1722.
35. Sprugel D. G. 1976. Dynamic structure of wave-regenerated Abies balsamea forests in the north-eastern United States. J. Ecol. 64: 889-911.
36. Strong A. M. et al. 2004. Effect of prey biomass on reproductive success and mating strategy of Bicknell's thrush (Catharus bicknelli), a polygynandrous songbird. Auk 121: 446-451.
37. Thomas C. D. 2000. Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B 267: 139-145.
38. Thomas J. A. et al. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1791-1796.
39. Verboom J. et al. 1991. European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61: 149-156.
40. Vogeli M. et al. 2010. The relative importance of patch habitat quality and landscape attributes on a declining steppe-bird metapopulation. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1057-1067.
41. Vogelmann J. E. et al. 2001. Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 67: 650-662.
42. With K. et al. 2006. The implications of metalandscape connectivity for population viability in migratory songbirds. Landscape Ecol. 21: 157-167.
43. With K. A. et al. 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78: 151-169.