Cress seed mucilage based buccal mucoadhesive gel of venlafaxine: In vivo, in vitro evaluation

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 771-779

  Nerkar, Pankaj Padmakar ^a   Gattan, Surendra Ganeshlal ^b  

^a R C PATEL INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

^b SWAMI RAMANAND TEERTH MARATHWADA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG; CARBOPOL; GEL STRENGTHS; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; IN-VIVO; ORAL ROUTE; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; PSEUDOPLASTIC FLOW; RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTY; VENLAFAXINE;

BIOCHEMISTRY; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ADHESIVES;

CARBOMER; VENLAFAXINE; CYCLOHEXANOL DERIVATIVE; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOAVAILABILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CRESS; CRESS SEED MUCILAGE; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; FLOW KINETICS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MAXIMUM PLASMA CONCENTRATION; MUCILAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STRENGTH; THIXOTROPY; CHEMISTRY; GEL; VISCOSITY;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

CYCLOHEXANOLS; GELS; SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITORS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84862733461     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4529-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Cascone MG, Maltinti S. Hydroge Is based chitosan and dextran as potential drug delivery systems. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1999;10(5):301-7.
2. Al-Yaha MA, Mossa JS, Ageel AM, Rafatu Uah S. Pharmaco-logical and safety evaluation studies on Lepidium sativum Linn seeds. Phytomedicine. 1994;01:155-9.
3. Divekar VB, Kalaskar MG, Redasani VK. Isolation and charac-terization of mucilage from Lepidium sativum Linn seeds. Int J Pharm Res Dev. 2006;2(01):1-5.
4. Salamat-Miller N, Chittchang M, Johnston TP. The use of mu-coadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:166-9I.
5. Makhija SN, Vavia PR. Once daily sustained release tablets of venlafaxine a novel antidepressant. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2002; 54:9-15.
6. Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery- A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release. 2006;114:15-40.
7. Bogtaj M, Vovk T, Kerec M, Dimnik A, Grabnar I, Mrhar A. The correlation between zeta potential and mucoadhesion strength on pig vesical mucosa. Bio Pharm Bull. 2003;26(5):743-6.
8. Takeuchi H, Thongborisute J, Matsui Y, Sugihara H, Yamamoto H, Kawashima Y. Nove1 mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery system. Adv Drug Deli Rev. 2005;57:1583-94.
9. Mahajan HS, Gattani S. In situ ge Is of metoclopramide hydro-chloride for intranasal delivery: in vitro evaluation and in vivo pharmacokinetic study in rabbits. Drug Deliv. 2010;17(1):19-27.
10. Yong CS, Choi JS, Rhee JD. Effect of sodium chloride on the gelation, gel strength and bioadhesive fore of polaxomer gels. Int J Pharm. 2001;275:195-205.
11. Murthy RSR, Majithiya RJ, Ghosh PK, Umrethia ML. Thermo-reversible mucoadhesive gel for nasal delivery of sumatriptan. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2006;7(3), Article 67: El-E7.
12. Mahajan H, Shaikh H, Gattani S, Nerkar P. In situ gelling system base on thiolated ge Uan gum as new carrier for nasal adminis-tration of dimenhydrinate. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechno I. 2009; 2(2):544-50.
13. Balasubrahmanyam J, Kant S, Pandit JK. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of Gelrite ge Uan gum based ocular delivery system for indomethacin. Acta Pharm. 2003;53:251-61.
14. Mitchka P. Simple conversion of Brookfie Id R.V.T readings into viscosity functions. Rheol Acta. 1982;21:207-9.
15. Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Ferrari G, Sandri G Thermally sensitive ge Is based on Chitosan derivatives for the treatment oral muco-sitis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:248-54.
16. Basak SC, Reddy BM, Mani KP. Formulation and release behavior of sustained release ambroxol hydrochloride HPMC matrix tablet. Indi J Pharm Sci. 2006;68:594-8.
17. Srianmornsak P, Sungthongjeen S. Modification of theophylline release with alginate gel formed in hard capsules. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2007;8(3):E1-8.
18. Singh B, Bala R, Chauhan N. In vitro release dynamics of model drugs from psyllium and acrylic acid based hydroge Is for the use in colon specific drug delivery. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2008; 19:2771-80.
19. Mahajan H, Gattani S. Ge Uan gum base microparticles of met-oclopramide hydrochloride for intranasal delivery: development and evaluation. Chem Pharm Bull. 2009;57(4):388-92.
20. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 1998;1(1):15-30.
21. Barrette AW, Selvarajah S, Franky S, Wi Us A, Berkkovitz BKB. Interspecies variations in oral epithelial cytokeratin expression. J Anat 1998;193:185-93.
22. Martin L, Wilson CG, Koosha F, Uchegbu IF. Sustained buccal delivery of hydrophobic drug denbufylline using physically cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;55:35-45.
23. Nerkar PP, Gattani S. In vivo in vitro evaluation of linseed mucilage buccal mucoadhesive microspheres of venlafaxine. Drug Deliv. 2010;18(2):111-21.
24. Tan YTF, Peh KK, Al-Hanbali 0. Effect of carbopol and polyvinylpyrrolidone on mechanical, rheological and release properties of bioadhesive polyethylene glycol gels. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2000;1(3):24.
25. Ilie C, Stinga G, Iovescu A, Purcar V, Agnel DF, Donescu D. The influence of nonionic surfactants on carbopol- PEG interpolymer complexes. Rev Roum Chim. 2010;55(7):407-17.
26. Shah AJ, Donavan MD. Formulating ge Is for decreased mucoc-illiary transport using rheologic properties: polyacrylic acids. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2007;8(2):33.
27. Belgamwar VS, Chauk DS, Mahajan HS, Jain SA. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gelling system of dimenhydrinate for nasal administration. Pharm Dev Technol. 2009. doi:10.1080/ 10837450802498910.
28. Gandhi RB, Robinson JR. Oral cavity as a site for bioadhesive drug delivery. Adv Drug Deli Rev. 1994;13:43-74.
29. Efentakis M, Koultis A, Vlachou M. Development and evaluation of oral multiple unit and single unit hydrophilic controlled release systems. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2000; 1(4): 62-70. Article 34.
30. Knuth K, Amiji M, Robinson JR. Hydrogel delivery systems for vaginal and oral applications. Formulation and biological con-sideration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1993;11:137-67.
31. Shin SC, Bum JP, Choi JS. Enhanced bioavailability by buccal administration of triamcinolone acetonide from the bioadhesive ge Is in rabbits. Int J Pharm. 2000;209:37-43.
32. Attia MA, El-Gibaly I, Shaltout SE, Fetih GN. Transbuccal perme-ation anti-inflammatory activity and clinical efficacy of piroxicam formulated in different gels. Int J Pharm. 2004;276:11-28.