A hierarchical model for optimal supplier selection in multiple sourcing contexts

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2953-2967

  Dotoli, M ^a   Falagario, M ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

data envelopment analysis; linear programming; optimal supplier selection; supplier efficiency; supplier evaluation; supply chain; technique for order preference by similarities to ideal solution

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL MODEL; HIERARCHICAL TECHNIQUES; IDEAL SOLUTIONS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM; SOURCING STRATEGIES; SUPPLIER EVALUATIONS; SUPPLIER SELECTION;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84862706058     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.578167     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biswas, S, and, Narahari, Y. 2004. Object oriented modelling and decision support for supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 153 (3): 704-726.
2. Burke, GJ, and, Vakharia, AJ. 2004. Supply chain management. In The internet encyclopedia, Edited by: Burke, G.J. and Vakharia, A.J. 365-373. New York: Wiley.
3. Charnes, A, Cooper, WW, and, Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (6): 429-444. (Pubitemid 9402758)
4. Costantino, N., et al., 2006. Fuzzy logic based vendor selection for the public procurement sector: a case study. In: Proceedings of SIGEF 2006, 13th congress of the international association for fuzzy set management and economy, 30 November-2 December, Hammamet, Tunisia. Hammamet: The International Association for Fuzzy Set Management and Economy (SIGEF), 294-316
5. Costantino, N, and, Pellegrino, R. 2010. Choosing between single and multiple sourcing based on supplier default risk: a real options approach. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 16 (1): 27-40.
6. de Boer, L, Labro, E, and, Morlacchi, P. 2001. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supplying Management, 7 (2): 75-89. (Pubitemid 33632140)
7. Degraeve, Z, Labro, E, and, Roodhooft, F. 2000. An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 125 (1): 34-58.
8. Dotoli, M., et al., 2010. An extension of the DEA model for supplier evaluation and selection. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation, 13-16 September, Bilbao, Spain. Bilbao: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 1-8
9. Dotoli, M. 2006. Design and optimisation of integrated e-supply chain for agile and environmentally conscious manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics. Part A, 36 (1): 62-75. (Pubitemid 43072316)
10. Ha, SH, and, Krishnan, R. 2008. A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (2): 1303-1311. (Pubitemid 350117499)
11. Ho, W, Xu, X, and, Dey, PK. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202 (1): 16-24.
12. Hwang, CL, and, Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. Karpak, B, Kumcu, E, and, Kasuganti, RR. 2001. Purchasing materials in the supply chain: managing a multi-objective task. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 7 (3): 209-216. (Pubitemid 33658255)
14. Krajewski, L, and, Ritzman, L. 2002. Operation management: strategy and analysis, 6th, London, UK: Prentice Hall.
15. Piramuthu, S. 2005. Knowledge-based framework for automated dynamic supply chain configuration. European Journal of Operational Research, 165 (1): 219-230. (Pubitemid 40135603)
16. Saen, RF. 2007. Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research, 183 (2): 741-747. (Pubitemid 46891143)
17. Sevkli, M. 2007. An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (9): 1973-2003. (Pubitemid 46433010)
18. Talluri, S, and, Baker, RJ. 2002. A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. European Journal of Operational Research, 141 (3): 544-558.
19. Talluri, S, and, Narasimhan, R. 2004. A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal of Operational Research, 154 (1): 236-250.
20. Talluri, S, Narasimhan, R, and, Nair, A. 2006. Vendor performance with supply risk: a chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 100 (2): 212-222. (Pubitemid 41737522)
21. Thompson, RG. 1990. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46 (1-2): 93-108.
22. Wang, Y-M, and, Chin, K-S. 2010. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (5): 3666-3675.
23. Weber, C, Current, J, and, Desai, A. 2000. An optimisation approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Management, 5 (2): 90-98. (Pubitemid 39034420)
24. Wu, D. 2009. Supplier selection: a hybrid model using DEA, decision tree and neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (5): 9105-9112.
25. Wu, T, and, Blackhurst, J. 2009. Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (16): 4593-4608.
26. Xia, WJ, and, Wua, ZM. 2007. Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 35 (5): 494-504.