Participant perceptions of use of CyWee Z as adjunct to rehabilitation of upper-limb function following stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 623-634

  Hale, Leigh A ^a   Satherley, Jessica A ^a   McMillan, Nicole J ^a   Milosavljevic, Stephan ^a   Hijmans, Juha M ^b   King, Marcus J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c CALLAGHAN INNOVATION   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Balance; Computer games; Concentration; CyWee Z controller; Function; General inductive approach; Qualitative; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GAME; GENERAL INDUCTIVE APPROACH; QUALITATIVE; STROKE; UPPER LIMBS;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); FUNCTIONS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PRECISION BALANCES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARM PAIN; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMPUTER GAME; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYWEE Z CONTROLLER; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SHOULDER PAIN; STROKE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES;

EID: 84862703961     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 19381352     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2001.04.0070     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Stroke Foundation of New Zealand. Facts and fallacies [Internet]. Wellington (New Zealand): Stroke Foundation of New Zealand, Inc; 2007 [cited 2010 Jan 21]. Available from: http://www.stroke.org.nz/about_stroke/about_stroke.html
2. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87(1): 88-97. [PMID:17179441] http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060065
3. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Proba-bility of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181-86. [PMID:12907818] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD
4. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011; 7(2):76-85. [PMID:21243015] http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200
5. Wyller TB, Sveen U, Sødring KM, Pettersen AM, Bautz-Holter E. Subjective well-being one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11(2):139-45. [PMID:9199866] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026921559701100207
6. Werner RA, Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpa-tient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75(2):114-20. [PMID:8630191] http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199603000-00006
7. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neu-rosurg Psychiatry. 1987;50(2):177-82. [PMID:3572432] http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177
8. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269): 1791-94. [PMID: 8650578] http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5269.1791
9. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement rep-resentations in primary motor cortex following focal isch-emic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75(5):2144-49. [PMID:8734610]
10. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S225-39. [PMID:18230848] http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018)
11. Hallett M. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recov-ery from stroke. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(2-3): 169-74. [PMID:11690613] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00092-3
12. Richards LG, Stewart KC, Woodbury ML, Senesac C, Cauraugh JH. Movement-dependent stroke recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS and fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(1):3-11. [PMID:17904594] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.013
13. Saposnik G, Levin M; Outcome Research Canada (SOR-Can) Working Group. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: A meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1380-86. [PMID:21474804] http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605451
14. Holden MK, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: A new tool for neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2002; 26(2):62-71.
15. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroengin Rehabil. 2004;1(1):10. [PMID:15679945] http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-1-10
16. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):898-915. [PMID:12201804]
17. Broeren J, Claesson L, Goude D, Rydmark M, Sunnerha-gen KS. Virtual rehabilitation in an activity centre for com-munity-dwelling persons with stroke. The possibilities of 3-dimensional computer games. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008; 26(3):289-96. [PMID:18667809] http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000149576
18. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neu-rorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):505-14. [PMID:19237734] http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331148
19. Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB, Stam HJ. "Playstation eye-toy games" improve upper extremity-related motor func-tioning in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):237-44. [PMID:18469735]2.
20. Smith CM, Read JE, Bennie C, Hale LA, Milosavljevic S. Can non-immersive virtual reality improve physical out-comes of rehabilitation? Phys Ther Rev. 2012;17(1):1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743288X11Y.0000000047
21. Lane JP, Usiak DJ, Stone VI, Scherer MJ. The voice of the customer: Consumers define the ideal battery charger. Assist Technol. 1997;9(2):130-39. [PMID:10177450] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1997.10132304
22. Cywee. CyWee Z controller [Internet]. Taipei (Taiwan): Cywee Group Ltd; 2010 [updated 2012; cited 2010 Jan 27]. Available from: http://www.cywee.com/products/motion/ cywee-z-controller
23. Hijmans JM, Hale LA, Satherley JA, McMillan NJ, King MJ. Bilateral upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke using a movement-based game controller. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(8):1005-13. [PMID: 22068375] http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.06.0109
24. Mertens DM. Transformative research and evaluation. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2009.
25. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investiga-tion of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-80. [PMID:3969398]
26. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
27. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evalua-tion of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7(1):13-31. [PMID:1135616]
28. Crosbie JH, McNeill MD, Burke J, McDonough S. Utilis-ing technology for rehabilitation of the upper limb follow-ing stroke: The Ulster experience. Phys Ther Rev. 2009; 14(5):336-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/108331909X12540993897892
29. Lange B, Flynn S, Rizzo A. Initial usability assessment of off-the-shelf video game consoles for clinical game-based motor rehabilitation. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14(5):355-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/108331909X12488667117258
30. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Cortese F, Zam-polini M, Zannini M, Dam M, Ventura L, Battauz M, Tonin P. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: A combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(12):1016-1102. [PMID:19841835] http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0459
31. IJsselsteijn W, De Kort Y, Poels K, Jurgelionis A, Bellotti F. Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. ACE Conference '07; 2007 Jun 13-15; Salzburg, Austria.
32. Lewis GN, Woods C, Rosie JA, McPherson KM. Virtual reality games for rehabilitation of people with stroke: Per-spectives from the users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(5):453-63. [PMID: 21495917] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.574310
33. King M, Hale L, Pekkari A, Persson M, Gregorsson M, Nilsson M. An affordable, computerised, table-based exer-cise system for stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(4):288-93. [PMID: 20302419] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483101003718161
34. Latimer CP, Keeling JR, Lin B, Henderson MW, Hale LA. The impact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32(15):1221-31. [PMID:20156045] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638280903483877
35. McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(1):29-41. [PMID:18356587]
36. Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: A rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;75(5):309-20. [PMID:15885874] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001
37. Cauraugh JH, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: A structured review and meta-analysis. Hum Mov Sci. 2010; 29(5):853-70. [PMID:19926154] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.004
38. Niessen MH, Veeger DH, Meskers CG, Koppe PA, Koni-jnenbelt MH, Janssen TW. Relationship among shoulder proprioception, kinematics, and pain after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(9):1557-64. [PMID:19735784] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.004
39. Fotiadis F, Grouios G, Ypsilanti A, Hatzinikolaou K. Hemi-plegic shoulder syndrome: Possible underlying neurophysio-logical mechanisms. Phys Ther Rev. 2005;10(1):51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/108331905X43445.
40. Broeren J, Sunnerhagen KS, Rydmark M. Haptic virtual rehabilitation in stroke: Transferring research into clinical practice. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14(5):322-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/108331909X12488667117212
41. Galvin J, Levac D. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: Describing and classifying virtual reality systems. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14(2):112-22. [PMID:21410403] http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2010.535805