Multiple decoupling point paradigms in a global supply chain syndrome: A relational analysis

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3051-3065

  Banerjee, Arnab ^a   Sarkar, Bijon ^a   Mukhopadhyay, S K ^a  

^a JADAVPUR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

decoupling point relation; fuzzy set theory; multidimensional scaling; multiple decoupling points; multiple material decoupling point

Indexed keywords

BILL OF MATERIALS; COMBINED EFFECT; CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS; DECOUPLING POINT; FUZZY APPLICATION; GLOBAL PRODUCTS; GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN; INFORMATION SHARING; LEAGILE; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SCALING; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SCALING METHODS; PARADIGM SHIFTS; PRODUCT CHAIN; PRODUCT STRUCTURE; PRODUCT VALUE CHAINS; STRESS COEFFICIENTS; SUPPLY NETWORKS;

FUZZY SET THEORY; MANUFACTURE;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84862703799     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.588624     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Akkerman, R, Meer, van der, D, and, Donk, van, PD. 2010. Make to stock and mix to order: choosing intermediate products in the food processing industry. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (12): 3475-3492.
2. Banerjee, A, and, Yadav, G. 2010. Empirical framework to determine decoupling points in an ATO scenario. Proceedings of 31st Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Management
3. Banerjee, A. Mukhopadhyay, S.K., and Sarkar, B., 2010. An intrinsic decoupling in managing supply chain syndrome. International Conference of Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, 20, 418-425
4. Banomyong, R, Veerakachen, V, and, Supatn, N. 2008. Implementing leagility in reverse logistics channels. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11 (1): 31-47.
5. Bhatnagar, R, Chandra, P, and, Goyal, SK. 1993. Models for multi-plant coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 67 (2): 141-160.
6. Christopher, M. 1992. Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1st, London: Pitman.
7. Chung, W, and, Ng, WT. 2008. A study of how distributors provide postponement services in the supply chain. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4 (4): 92-101.
8. Donk, van, PD. 2001. Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries. International journal of Production Economics, 69 (3): 297-306.
9. Garcia-Dastugue, JS, and, Lambert, MD. 2007. Interorganizational time-based postponement in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 28 (1): 57-80.
10. Giesberts, PMJ, and, van der Tang, L. 1992. Dynamics of the customer order decoupling point: impact on information systems for production control. Production Planning & Control, 3 (3): 300-313.
11. Krishnamurthy, R, and, Yauch, CA. 2007. Leagile manufacturing: a proposed corporate infrastructure. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27 (6): 588-604.
12. Kruskal, KB. 1964. Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numeric method. Psychometrika, 29 (2): 115-129.
13. Mason-Jones, R, and, Towill, DR. 1999. Using the information decoupling point to improve the supply chain performance. International Journal of Logistics Management Systems, 10 (2): 13-26.
14. Mason-Jones, R, Naylor, B, and, Towill, DR. 2000a. Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the market place. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (17): 4061-4070. (Pubitemid 35401887)
15. Mason-Jones, R, Naylor, B, and, Towill, DR. 2000b. Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2 (1): 54-61.
16. Mitaim, S, and, Kosko, B. 2001. The shape of fuzzy sets in adaptive function approximation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 9 (4): 637-656. (Pubitemid 32933048)
17. Mukhopadhyay, SK, Sarkar, P, and, Panda, RP. 1994. Machine-component grouping in cellular manufacturing by multidimensional scaling. International Journal of Production Research, 32 (2): 457-477.
18. Naim, MM, and, Gosling, J. 2011. On leanness, agility, and leagile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 131 (1): 342-354.
19. Naylor, BJ, Naim, MM, and, Berry, D. 1999. Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1-2): 107-118.
20. Olhager, J. 2003. Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics, 85 (3): 319-329.
21. Olhager, J, Selldin, E, and, Wikner, J. 2006. Decoupling the value chain. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 1 (1): 19-32.
22. Pham, DT, and, Thomas, A. 2005. Fighting fit factories: making industry lean, agile and sustainable. IEE Manufacturing Engineer, 84 (2): 24-29. (Pubitemid 40635312)
23. Piegat, A. 2005. A new definition of fuzzy set. International Journal of Applied Mathematical Computer Science, 15 (1): 125-140.
24. Pontrandolfo, P, and, Okogbaa, OG. 1999. Global manufacturing: a review and a framework for planning in a global corporation. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (1): 1-19.
25. Rahimnia, F, and, Mahdi, M. 2010. Supply chain leagility in professional services: how to apply the decoupling point concept in a healthcare delivery system. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15 (1): 80-91.
26. Sharman, G. 1984. The rediscovery of logistics. Harvard Business Review, 62 (5): 71-79.
27. Shepard, RN. 1962a. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function I. Psychometrika, 27 (3): 125-139.
28. Shepard, RN. 1962b. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function II. Psychometrika, 27 (3): 219-246.
29. Smithson, M, and, Verkuilen, J. 2006. Fuzzy set theory: applications in the social sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Sun, XY. 2008. Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network. International Journal of Production Economics, 113 (2): 943-956.
31. Swaminathan, JM, and, Tayur, SR. 1998. Managing broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes. Management Science, 44 (12): S161-S172.
32. Towill, D, and, Christopher, M. 2002. The supply chain strategy conundrum: to be lean or agile or to be lean and agile?. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Application, 5 (3): 299-309.
33. Verdouw, CN. Beulens, A.J.M., and Trienekens, J.H., 2006. Modelling demand-driven chain networks using multiple CODPs. In: Proceedings of advanced production management system conference on lean business systems and beyond, Wroclaw, Poland, 313-318
34. Vlist, PV, Hoppenbrouwers, MEJJ, and, Hegge, HMH. 1997. Extending the enterprise through multi-level supply control. International Journal of Production Economics, 53 (2): 35-42. (Pubitemid 127404111)
35. Vorst, vander, JG, and, Dijk, van, Stephan, Beulens, A. 2001. Leagile supply chain design in the food industry: using decoupling points in an inflexible poultry supply chain with high demand uncertainty. International Journal on Logistics Management, 12 (2): 73-85.
36. Wang, F, Lin, J, and, Liu, XH. 2010. Three-dimensional model of customer order decoupling point position in mass customization. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (13): 3741-3757.
37. Wikner, J, and, Rudberg, M. 2005. Introducing a customer order decoupling zone in logistics decision making. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8 (3): 211-224.
38. Xuejun, X, Qi, F, and, Zhiyong, G. 2007. Research on lean, agile and leagile supply chains. International Conference in Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 7 (1): 4902-4907.
39. Yanez, CF. 2009. Agent-based simulation and analysis of demand-driven production strategies in the timber industry. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (22): 6295-6319.
40. Zimmermann, HJ. 1996. Fuzzy set theory and its application, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.