Precision of Usual Food Intake Estimates According to the Percentage of Individuals with a Second Dietary Measurement

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Volumn 112, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1015-1020

  Verly Jr, Eliseu ^a   Castro, Michelle A ^b   Fisberg, Regina M ^b   Marchioni, Dirce M Lobo ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dietary measurement; Nutritional assessment; Replication rate; Statistical methods; Usual intake

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DIET; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; VEGETABLE;

ADOLESCENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DIET; DIET SURVEYS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (U.S.); NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84862694891     PISSN: 22122672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.028     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Nusser S.M., Carriquiry A.L., Dodd K.W., Fuller W.A. A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1996, 91(436):1440-1449.
2. Dodd K.W., Guenther P.M., Freedman L.S., et al. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: A review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106(10):1640-1650.
3. Subar A., Dodd K.W., Guenther P.M., et al. The Food Propensity Questionnaire: Concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106(10):1556-1563.
4. Beaton G.H., Milner J., Corey P., et al. Source of variation in 24-hour dietary recall data: Implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr 1979, 32(12). 2546-2459.
5. Carriquiry A.L. Estimation of usual intake distributions of nutrients and foods. J Nutr 2003, 133(2 suppl):601S-608S.
6. Freedman L.S., Midthune D., Carroll R.J., et al. Adjustments to improve the estimation of usual dietary intake distributions in the population. J Nutr 2004, 134(7):1836-1843.
7. Tooze J.A., Midthune D., Dodd K.W., et al. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc 2006, 106(10):1575-1587.
8. Guenther P.M., Kott P.S., Carriquiry A.L. Development of an approach for estimating usual nutrient intake distributions at the population level. J Nutr 1997, 127:1106-1112.
9. Hartig U., Haubrock J., Knüppel S., Boeing H. The MSM program: Web-based statistics package for estimating usual dietary intake using the Multiple Source Method. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011, (65):S87-S91.
10. Tooze J.A., Kipnis V., Buckman D.W., et al. A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI method. Stat Med 2010, 29(27):2857-2868.
11. Krebs-Smith S.M., Guenther P.M., Subar A.F., Kirkpatrick S.I. Americans do not meet federal recommendations. J Nutr 2010, 140:1832-1838.
12. Usual dietary intakes: The NCI method Accessed October 27, 2011. http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/diet/usualintakes/method.html.
13. About the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Accessed March 11, 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm.
14. Moshfegh A.J., Rhodes D.G., Baer D.J., et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 2008, 88(2):324-332.
15. Kipnis V., Midthune D., Buckman D.W., et al. Modeling data with excess zeros and measurement error: Application to evaluating relationships between episodically consumed foods and health outcomes. Biometrics 2009, 65(4):1003-1010.