PREPARING PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 117-149

  Lee, Janet ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

annual reports; performance information; public sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862683754     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00449.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aidemark, L. (2001), ‘The Meaning of Balanced Scorecards in the Health Care Organization’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 23–40.
2. Anthony, R.N. (1978), ‘What Nonbusiness Organization Accounting Information Do Users Need?’, Governmental Finance (May), pp. 14–20.
3. Audit Office of New South Wales (2000a), Performance Audit Report: Judging Performance from Annual Reports: Review of Eight Agencies' Annual Reports.
4. Audit Office of New South Wales (2000b), Reporting Performance: A Guide to Preparing Performance Information for Annual Reports (November).
5. Audit Office of New South Wales (2003), Performance Audit Report: Judging Performance from Annual Reports: Review of Eight Agencies' Annual Reports (October).
6. Australian Accounting Standards Board Framework (AASB Framework) (2004), Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements (July).
7. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (1996), Performance Information Principles, Better Practice Guide (November).
8. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2001), Performance Information in Portfolio Budget Statements, Audit Report No.18 2001-2002.
9. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2002), Performance Information in Portfolio Budget Statements, Better Practice Guide (May).
10. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2003), Public Sector Governance, Volume 1, Better Practice Guide (July).
11. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2004), Better Practice in Annual Performance Reporting, Better Practice Guide.
12. Barrett, P. (2001a), ‘Auditing in an Outsourced Environment’, Australian National Audit Office (June).
13. Barrett, P. (2001b), ‘Auditing in an Environment of Public/Private Partnership and Greater Collaboration in the Provision of Public Services’, Australian National Audit Office (October).
14. Barrett, P. (2004), ‘Developments in Government Accounting and Auditing in Australia’, Australian National Audit Office (March).
15. Barton, A. (2003), ‘The Department of Defence – Australia's Most Profitable Business?’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 2 (July), pp. 35–40.
16. Barton, A. (2006), ‘Public Sector Accountability and Commercial-in-Confidence Outsourcing Contracts’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 256–71.
17. Bartos, S. (1995), ‘Current Developments in Performance Information’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 54, No. 3 (September), pp. 387–92.
18. Carlin, T. and J. Guthrie (2001), ‘The New Business of Government Budgeting: Reporting Non-financial Performance Information in Victoria’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 3 (November), pp. 17–26.
19. Christensen, M. and H. Yoshimi (2001), ‘A Two-Country Comparison of Public Sector Performance Reporting: The Tortoise and Hare?’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 17, No. 3 (August), pp. 271–89.
20. Clark, C. (2003), ‘The Performance Information Needs of Users of the Annual Reports of Government Departments’, Accountability Symposium, Accounting and Finance Association of Australian and New Zealand, Brisbane (July).
21. Commonwealth Department of Finance and Administration (2000), The Outcomes & Outputs Framework Guidance Document, Commonwealth of Australia (November).
22. Commonwealth Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2001), Requirements for Annual Reports, Commonwealth of Australia (June).
23. Copley, P.A., R.H. Cheng, J.E. Harris, R.C. Icerman, W.L. Johnson, G.R. Smith, K.A. Smith, W.T. Wrege and R. Yahr (1997), ‘The New Governmental Reporting Model: Is It a ‘Field of Dreams’?’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 11, No. 3 (September), pp. 91–101.
24. Coy, D., K. Dixon, J. Buchanan and G. Tower (1997), ‘Recipients of Public Sector Annual Reports: Theory and an Empirical Study Compared’, British Accounting Review, Vol. 29, pp. 103–27.
25. Daniels, J.D. and C.E. Daniels (1991), ‘Municipal Financial Reports: What Users Want’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 15–38.
26. Emory, C. and D. Cooper (1991), Business Research Method (4th ed., Irwin, Homewood, IL).
27. Ezzamel, M., N. Hyndman, A. Johnsen, I. Lapsley and J. Pallot (2005), ‘Accounting, Accountability and Devolution: A Study of the Use of Accounting Information by Politicians in the Northern Ireland Assembly's First Term’, The Irish Accounting Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 39–62.
28. Forsythe, D.W. (2001), ‘Pitfalls in Designing and Implementing Performance Management Systems’, in D.W. Forsythe (ed.), Quicker Better Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government (Rockefeller Institute Press, Albany, NY), pp. 519–51.
29. Gaffney, M.A. (1986), ‘Consolidated Versus Fund-Type Accounting Statements: The Perspectives of Constituents’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 5, pp. 167–89.
30. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), n.d., Performance Measurement at the State and Local Levels: A Summary of Survey Results
31. Governmental Accounting Standards Board and National Academy of Public Administration (GASB-NAPA) (1997), Survey of State and Local Government Use and Reporting of Performance Measures, First Questionnaire Results (September).
32. Grimsey, D. and M.K. Lewis (2002), ‘Accounting for Public Private Partnership’, Accounting Forum, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 245–70.
33. Guthrie, J. (1993), ‘Critical Issues in Performance Measurement and Indicators’, in J. Guthrie (ed.), The Australian Public Sector: Pathway to Change in the 1990s (Sydney: IIR Conferences), pp. 69–74.
34. Guthrie, J. (1994), ‘Performance Indicators in the Australian Public Sector’, in E. Buschor and K. Schedler (eds), Perspectives on Performance Measurement and Public Sector Accounting (Paul Haupt Berne), pp. 259–77.
35. Guthrie, J. and L.D. Parker (1998), ‘Managerialism and Marketisation in Financial Management Change in Australia’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 49–75.
36. Hatry, H.P. (2001), ‘What Types of Performance Information Should be Tracked?’, in D.W. Forsythe (ed.), Quicker Better Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government (Rockefeller Institute Press, Albany, N.Y.), pp. 17–34.
37. Hay, D. (1994), ‘Who Uses Public Sector External Reports? An Exploration’, Accounting Forum (March), pp. 47–65.
38. Hood, C. (1991), ‘A Public Management for All Seasons?’, Public Administration, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 3–19.
39. Hood, C. (1995), ‘The New Public Management in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2/3, pp. 93–103.
40. Hopwood, A. (1984), ‘Accounting and the Pursuit of Efficiency’, in A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins (eds.), Issues in Public Sector Accounting (Philip Allan), pp. 167–87.
41. Humphrey, C., P. Miller and H. Smith (1998), ‘Financial Management in the UK Public Sector: Ambiguities, Paradoxes and Limits’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 304–45.
42. Hyndman, N. (1990), ‘Charity Accounting – An Empirical Study of the Information Needs of Contributors to UK Fund Raising Charities’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 295–307.
43. Hyndman, N. (1991), ‘Contributors to Charities – A Comparison of their Information Needs and the Perceptions of Such by the Providers of Information’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 69–82.
44. Hyndman, N. and R. Anderson (1998), ‘Performance Information, Accountability and Executive Agencies’, Public Money & Management, Vol. 18, No. 3 (July), pp. 23–30.
45. Hyndman, N. and R. Eden (2000), ‘A Study of the Co-ordination of Mission, Objectives and Targets in UK Executive Agencies’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2 (June), pp. 175–91.
46. Hyndman, N. and R. Eden (2001), ‘Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland’, Pubic Administration, Vol. 79, No. 3 (Autumn), pp. 579–98.
47. Hyndman, N. and R. Eden (2002), ‘Executive Agencies, Performance Targets and External Reporting’, Public Money & Management, Vol. 22, No. 3 (July), pp. 17–24.
48. Jones, D.B., R.B. Scott, L. Kimbro and R. Ingram (1985), The Needs of Users of Governmental Financial Reports, Research Report, Governmental Accounting Standards Board (October).
49. Kloot, L. and J. Martin (2000), ‘Strategic Performance Management: A Balanced Approach to Performance Management: Issues in Local Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 231–51.
50. Kluvers, R. (1998), ‘The Development and Use of Performance Indicators in Victorian Local Government’, Accountability & Performance, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 61–77.
51. Lee, J. (1999), ‘The Reporting of Economic Infrastructure Assets by Public Sector Entities in New South Wales: An Exploratory Study’, Accounting, Accountability and Performance, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 17–39.
52. Management Advisory Board, Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB) (1992), The Australian Public Service Reformed: An Evaluation of a Decade of Management Reform, Task Force on Management Improvement, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (December).
53. Management Advisory Board, Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB) (1993a), Performance Information and the Management Cycle, Commonwealth of Australia, Report No. 10 (February).
54. Management Advisory Board, Management Improvement Advisory Committee (MAB) (1993b), Accountability in the Commonwealth Public Sector, Commonwealth of Australia, Report No. 11 (June).
55. Mayston, D. (1985), ‘Non-Profit Performance Indicators in the Public Sector’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Summer), pp. 51–74.
56. Micallef, F., P. Sutcliffe and P. Doughty (1994), Financial Reporting by Governments, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Discussion Paper No. 21.
57. Midwinter, A. and M. McVicar (1996), ‘Performance Information for Scottish Public Library Authorities’, Library Review, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 25–30.
58. Modell, S. (2004), ‘Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39–55.
59. National Commission of Audit (1996), Report to the Commonwealth Government, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (June).
60. Neale, A. and B. Anderson (2000), ‘Performance Reporting for Accountability Purposes: Lessons, Issues, Future’, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 93–106.
61. Nørreklit, H. (2003), ‘The Balanced Scorecard: What is the Score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 591–619.
62. O'Faircheallaigh, C., J. Wanna and P. Weller (2000), Public Sector Management in Australia (2nd. ed., MacMillan).
63. Olson, O., J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (1998), ‘International Experiences with New Public Financial Management (NPFM) Reforms: New World? Small World? Better World?’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 17–48.
64. Parker, L. and G. Gould (1999), ‘Changing Public Sector Accountability: Critiquing New Directions’, Accounting Forum, Vol. 23, No. 2 (June), pp. 109–35.
65. Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert (2000), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
66. Queensland Treasury (2002), Performance Management Framework 2002.
67. Queensland Treasury (2003), Government Priorities, Outcomes, Outcome Indicators and Key Outcome Measures (March).
68. Rivenbark, W.C. and J.M. Kelly (2000), ‘Performance Measurement: A Local Government Response’, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 74–86.
69. Schick, A. (2001), ‘Getting Performance Measures to Measure Up’, in D.W. Forsythe (ed.), Quicker Better Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government (Rockefeller Institute Press, Albany, N.Y.), pp. 39–60.
70. Simms, M. and M. Keating (1999), ‘Accountability in Australian Government: Towards the Year 2000’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 58, No. 1 (March), pp. 33–47.
71. Spigelman, J. (2001), ‘A Performance that Doesn't Measure Up’, The Public Sector Informer, The Australian Financial Review (28 August), p. 10.
72. Steccolini, I. (2004), ‘Is the Annual Report an Accountability Medium? An Empirical Investigation into Italian Local Governments’, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 20, No. 3 (August), pp. 327–50.
73. Steering Committee for the Review of Commonwealth/State Service Provision (SCRCSSP) (2000), Report on Government Service Provision, Volume 1, Commonwealth of Australia.
74. Stewart, J. (1984), ‘The Role of Information in Public Accountability’, in A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins (eds.), Issues in Public Sector Accounting (Philip Allan), pp. 13–34.
75. Tasmania Department of Treasury and Finance (1997), Performance Information for Management and Accountability Purposes (October).
76. Taylor, D.W. and M. Rosair (2000), ‘The Effects of Participating Parties, the Public and Size on Government Departments' Accountability Disclosures in Annual Reports’, Accounting, Accountability & Performance, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 77–97.
77. Thomas, V.L. (2001), ‘Restoring Government Integrity Through Performance, Results, and Accountability’, in D.W. Forsythe (ed.), Quicker Better Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government (Rockefeller Institute Press, Albany, N.Y.), pp. 113–42.
78. Victoria Department of Treasury and Finance (1997), Output Specification and Performance Measurement.
79. Walker, R. (1995), ‘Who Reads Annual Reports?”, Proceedings of the Seminar on Annual Reporting in the NSW Public Sector: The Best is Yet to Come, Report of the Public Accounts Committee (September), pp. 19–28.
80. Walker, R. (2001), ‘Reporting on Service Efforts and Accomplishments on a ‘Whole of Government’ Basis’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 3 (November), pp. 4–16.
81. Walker, R. (2002), ‘Are Annual Reports of Government Agencies Really ‘General Purpose’ if They Do Not Include Performance Indicators?’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 12, No. 1 (March), pp. 43–54.
82. Wallace, R.S.O. and C.J. Mellor (1988), ‘Nonresponse Bias in Mail Accounting Surveys: A Pedagogical Note’, British Accounting Review (August), pp. 131–39.
83. Young, J.J., L. Oakes and A. Preston (1998), ‘Reinvent or Dismantle: Efforts to Restructure U.S. Federal Financial Management’, in O. Olson, J. Guthrie and C. Humphrey (eds.), Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Cappelen Akademisk Forlag as, Oslo), pp. 346–75.