The student activity meter for awareness and self-reflection

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 869-884

  Govaerts, Sten ^a   Verbert, Katrien ^a   Duval, Erik ^a   Pardo, Abelardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

awareness; evaluation; monitoring; self reflection; teaching; visualization

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; DESIGN ITERATION; EVALUATION; FLEXIBLE MECHANISMS; HEALTH MONITORING; INFORMATICS; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS; RESOURCE USE; SELF REFLECTION; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; TIME SPENT; USER ACTION;

FLOW VISUALIZATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MONITORING; TEACHING;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84862666468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2212776.2212860     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Distance learning: From multiple snapshots, a composite portrait. Computers and Composition, 23(1):139-161, 2006.
2. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2011, February 2011.
3. Personal Informatics & HCI, CHI'11 workshop.
4. H. S. Alavi et al. Distributed awareness for class orchestration. ECTEL '09, pp 211-225, 2009.
5. K. R. Allendoerfer. How information visualization systems change users' understandings of complex data. PhD thesis, Drexel Uni., 2010.
6. A. Bangor, P. T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. Journ. of HCI, 24(6):574-594, 2008.
7. J. Benedek and T. Miner. Measuring desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting. In Proc. of UPA Conf., 2002.
8. J. Brooke. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. 1996.
9. A. Dasgupta and R. Kosara. Pargnostics: Screen-space metrics for parallel coordinates. IEEE TVCG, 16:1017-1026, 2010.
10. S. Govaerts et al. Evaluating the student activity meter: two case studies. In ICWL, LNCS, in press, 2011.
11. S. Govaerts et al. Visualizing activities for self-reflection and awareness. In ICWL, LNCS, 6483, pp 91-100, 2010.
12. J. Hardy, S. Bates, J. Hill, and M. Antonioletti. Tracking and visualisation of student use of online learning materials in a large undergraduate course. In ICWL, LNCS, 4823, pp 464-474, 2008.
13. J. Janssen et al. Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49(4):1037-1065, 2007. (Pubitemid 47284631)
14. D. Keim et al. Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges. In Information Visualization, LNCS, 4950:154-175. 2008.
15. T. Z. Keith. Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Edu. Psycho., 74(2):248-253, 1982.
16. R. Mazza and C. Milani. Exploring usage analysis in learning systems : Gaining insights from visualisations. Time, p 65, 2005.
17. J. Nielsen. Usability Engineering. 1st ed., 1993.
18. Ž. Obrenović. Design-based research: what we learn when we engage in design of interactive systems. Interactions, 18:56-59, 2011.
19. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. AVI '04, pp 109-116, 2004.
20. S. Purpura et al. Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In CHI '11, pp 423-432, 2011.
21. H.-C. Schmitz et al. Camera for PLE. In EC-TEL, LNCS, 5794, pp 507-520. 2009.
22. M. Sedlmair et al. Cardiogram: visual analytics for automotive engineers. In CHI '11, pp 1727-1736. 2011.
23. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In IEEE VL/HCC, p 336. 1996.
24. H. Siirtola et al. Visual perception of parallel coordinate visualizations. In IV '09, pp 3-9. 2009.
25. J. Sinclair et al. The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? J. of Info. Science, 34:15-29, 2008.
26. A. Soller et al. From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. I. J. AI in Education, 15(4):261-290, 2005.
27. D. Straker. A Toolbook for Quality Improvement and Problem Solving. Prentice Hall, 1995.
28. T. S. Tullis et al A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. In UPU Conf., 2004.
29. M. van Someren et al. The think aloud method: a practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. 1994.
30. J. Wang et al. Interactive hierarchical dimension ordering, spacing and filtering for exploration of high dimensional datasets. In IEEE INFOVIS, pp 105 -112, 2003.
31. W. Wang et al. Visualization of large hierarchical data by circle packing. CHI '06, pp 517-520, 2006 (Pubitemid 44032139)
32. M. Q. Wang Baldonado et al. Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In AVI '00, pp 110-119, 2000.
33. M. Wolpers et al. Tracking actual usage: the attention metadata approach. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3):106-121, 2007.
34. H. Zhang et al. Moodog: Tracking students' online learning activities. In EDMEDIA'07, pp 4415-4422.
35. J. Zhao et al. Kronominer: using multi-foci navigation for the visual exploration of time-series data. In CHI '11, pp 1737-1746, 2011.
36. H. Zhou et al. Splatting the lines in parallel coordinates. CG Forum, 28(3):759-766, 2009.
37. B. J. Zimmerman. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2):65-70, 2002.