Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 879-890

  Zehetleitner, Michael ^a   Rangelov, Dragan ^a   Müller, Hermann J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Interactions with memory; Repetition effects; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REPETITION PRIMING; SHORT TERM MEMORY; UNCERTAINTY;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REPETITION PRIMING; SERIAL LEARNING; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84862653462     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0287-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2011). Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1350-1360. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-011-0119-5.
2. Becker, S. I. (2010). Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Vision Research, 50, 2116-2126. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2010. 08. 001.
3. Bravo, M. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465-472. doi: 10. 3758/BF03211642.
4. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 97. 4. 523.
5. Chan, L. K. H., & Hayward, W. G. (2009). Feature integration theory revisited: Dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 119-132. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 35. 1. 119.
6. Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234. doi: 10. 1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9.
8. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension-weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101. doi: 10. 3758/BF03205479.
9. Goolsby, B. A., & Suzuki, S. (2001). Understanding priming of color-singleton search: Roles of attention at encoding and retrieval. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 929-944. doi: 10. 3758/BF03194513.
10. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27-45. doi: 10. 1016/S0301-0511(03)00101-7.
11. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817. doi: 10. 3758/BF03206924.
12. Huang, L., Holcombe, A. O., & Pashler, H. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming. Memory & Cognition, 32, 12-20. doi: 10. 3758/BF03195816.
13. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O.
14. Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69-104. doi: 10. 1080/14640749208401284.
15. Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 5-18. doi: 10. 3758/APP. 72. 1. 5.
16. Lamy, D., Yashar, A., & Ruderman, L. (2010). A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects. Vision Research, 50, 1396-1401. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2010. 01. 008.
17. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672. doi: 10. 3758/BF03209251.
18. Mortier, K., Theeuwes, J., & Starreveld, P. (2005). Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 542-557. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 31. 3. 542.
19. Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14, 490-513. doi: 10. 1080/13506280500194154.
20. Olivers, C., & Meeter, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven. Visual Cognition, 13, 1-28. doi: 10. 1080/13506280500308101.
21. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011a). Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: Evidence for multiple weighting systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 100-114. doi: 10. 1037/a0020364.
22. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011b). Independent dimension-weighting mechanisms for visual selection and stimulus identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1369-1382. doi: 10. 1037/a0024265.
23. Rangelov, D., Müller, H. J., & Zehetleitner, M. (in press). The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-011-0251-2.
24. Töllner, T., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2008). Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 531-542. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 34. 3. 531.
25. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2. 0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. doi: 10. 3758/BF03200774.
26. Yashar, A., & Lamy, D. (2011). Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: Does motor response or response feature matter? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2160-2167. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-011-0182-y.
27. Zehetleitner, M., & Müller, H. J. (2010). Salience from the decision perspective: You know where it is before you know it is there. Journal of Vision, 10(14), 35. doi: 10. 1167/10. 14. 35.