Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO 2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review

Surveys in Geophysics

Volumn 33, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 619-635

  Andrews, Timothy ^a   Gregory, Jonathan M ^a,b   Forster, Piers M ^c   Webb, Mark J ^a  

^a MET OFFICE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate sensitivity; Cloud feedback; Radiative forcing; Tropospheric adjustment

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE SENSITIVITY; CLOUD TYPES; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; FULLY-COUPLED; GLOBAL FEEDBACK; LAND SURFACE; LOW LEVEL; MULTI-MODEL; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; TRANSIENT CLIMATE CHANGE; TROPOSPHERIC ADJUSTMENT; TROPOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE;

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; TROPOSPHERE;

CLIMATE MODELS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE FEEDBACK; CLOUD; CLOUD COVER; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; HADLEY CELL; RADIATIVE FORCING; TROPOSPHERE;

EID: 84862649741     PISSN: 01693298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-011-9152-0     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrological cycle. Nature 419: 224-232. doi: 10. 1038/nature01092.
2. 2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations. Geophys Res Lett 35: L04802. doi: 10. 1029/2007GL032273.
3. Andrews T, Forster PM (2010) The transient response of global-mean precipitation to increasing carbon dioxide levels. Environ Res Lett 5: 025212. doi: 10. 1088/1748-9326/5/2/025212.
4. Andrews T, Forster PM, Gregory JM (2009) A surface energy perspective on climate change. J Clim 22: 2557-2570. doi: 10. 1175/2008JCLI2759. 1.
5. Andrews T, Forster PM, Boucher O, Bellouin N, Jones A (2010) Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change. Geophys Res Lett 27: L14701. doi: 10. 1029/2010GL043991.
6. Andrews T, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Boucher O, Forster PM (2011) A regional and global analysis of carbon dioxide physiological forcing and its impact on climate. Clim Dyn 36: 783-792. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-010-0742-1.
7. Arkin PA, Smith T, Sapiano M, Janowiak J (2010) The observed sensitivity of the global hydrological cycle to changes in surface temperature. Environ Res Lett 5: 035201. doi: 10. 1088/1748-9326/5/3/035201.
8. Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R (2010) Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle. Clim Dyn 35: 423-434. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-009-0583-y.
9. Bellouin N, O Boucher, JM Haywood, CE Johnson, A Jones, JG L Rae, S Woodward (2007) Improved representation of aerosols for HadGEM2. Hadley Centre Tech Note, 73, 43 pp.
10. Betts RA, Cox PM, Lee SE, Woodward FI (1997) Contrasting physiological and structural vegetation feedbacks in climate change simulations. Nature 387: 796-799.
11. Boer GJ, Yu B (2003) Climate sensitivity and response. Clim Dyn 20: 415-429. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-002-0283-3.
12. Bony S et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19: 3445-3482.
13. Bony S, Webb M, Bretherton C, Klein S, Siebesma P, Tselioudis G, Zhang M (2011) CFMIP: towards a better evaluation and understanding of clouds and cloud feedbacks in CMIP5 models. Clivar Exch 56(16): 2.
14. Boucher O, Jones A, Betts RA (2009) Climate response to the physiological impact of carbon dioxide on plants in the Met Office Unified Model HadCM3. Clim Dyn 32: 237-249. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-008-0459-6.
15. Colman R, McAvaney BJ (2011) On tropospheric adjustment to forcing and climate feedbacks. Clim Dyn 36: 1649-1658. doi: 10. 1007/s00384-011-1067-4.
16. Cox PM, Betts RA, Bunton CB, Essery RLH, Rowntree PR, Smith J (1999) The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Clim Dyn 15: 183-203.
17. Dong B, Gregory JM, Sutton RT (2009) Understanding land-sea warming contrast in response to increasing greenhouse gases. Part I: transient adjustment. J Clim 22: 3079-3097.
18. Doutriaux-Boucher M, Webb MJ, Gregory JM, Boucher O (2009) Carbon dioxide induced stomatal closure increases radiative forcing via a rapid reduction in low cloud. Geophys Res Lett 36: L02703. doi: 10. 1029/2008GL036273.
19. 2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell Environ 18: 1214-1225.
20. Forster PM, Taylor KE (2006) Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J Clim 19: 6181-6194.
21. Forster P et al (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 131-234.
22. Frieler K, Meinshausen M, von Deimling TS, Andrews T, Forster P (2011) Changes in global-mean precipitation in response to warming, greenhouse gas forcing and black carbon. Geophys Res Lett 38: L04702. doi: 10. 1029/2010GL045953.
23. 2 forcing. J Clim 21: 58-71.
24. Gregory JM et al (2004) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31: L03205. doi: 10. 1029/2003GL018747.
25. Hansen J et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110: D18104. doi: 10. 1029/2005JD005776.
26. Held IM, Winton M, Takahashi K, Delworth T, Zeng F, Vallis GK (2010) Probing the fast and slow components of global warming by returning abruptly to preindustrial forcing. J Clim 23: 2418-2427. doi: 10. 1175/2009JCLI3466. 1.
27. Johns TC et al (2006) The new hadley centre climate model HadGEM1: evaluation of coupled simulations. J Clim 19: 1327-1353.
28. Joshi M, Gregory JM (2008) Dependence of the land-sea contrast in surface climate response on the nature of the forcing. Geophys Res Lett 35: L24802. doi: 10. 1029/2008GL036234.
29. Joshi MM, Gregory JM, Webb MJ, Sexton DMH, Johns TC (2008) Mechanisms for the land/sea warming contrast exhibited by simulations of climate change. Clim Dyn 30: 455-465. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-007-0306-01.
30. Klein SA, Jakob C (1999) Validation and sensitivities of frontal clouds simulated by the ECMWF model. Mon Weather Rev 127: 2514-2531.
31. Knutti R, Hegerl GC (2008) The equilibrium sensitivity of the earth's temperature to radiation changes. Nature 1: 735-743. doi: 10. 1038/ngeo337.
32. Lambert FH, Allen MR (2009) Are changes in global precipitation constrained by the tropospheric energy budget? J Clim 22: 499-517.
33. Lambert FH, Webb MJ (2008) Dependence of global mean precipitation on surface temperature. Geophys Res Lett 35: L16706. doi: 10. 1029/2008GL034838.
34. Lohmann U et al (2010) Total aerosol effect: radiative forcing or radiative flux perturbation? Atmos Chem Phys 10: 3235-3246.
35. Martin GM, Ringer MA, Pope VD, Jones A, Dearden C, Hinton TJ (2006) The physical properties of the atmosphere in the new Hadley centre global environmental model (HadGEM1). Part I: model description and global climatology. J Clim 19: 1274-1301.
36. Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 88: 1383-1394.
37. 2 climate sensitivity and model dependence of results. Q J R Meteorol Soc 113: 293-322.
38. Randall DA et al (2007) Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 591-662.
39. Rotstayn LD, Penner JE (2001) Indirect aerosol forcing, quasi forcing, and climate response. J Clim 14: 2960-2975.
40. 2 on climate. Science 271: 1402-1406. doi: 10. 1126/science. 271. 5254. 1402.
41. Senior CA, Mitchell JFB (2000) The time-dependence of climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 27(17): 2685-2688.
42. Shine KP, Cook J, Highwood EJ, Joshi MM (2003) An alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanisms. Geophys Res Lett 30(20): 2047. doi: 10. 1029/2003GL018141.
43. Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. J Clim 19: 3354-3360.
44. Soden BJ, Broccoli AJ, Hemler RS (2004) On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. J Clim 17(19): 3661-3665.
45. Soden BJ, Held IM, Colman R, Shell KM, Kiehl JT, Shields CA (2008) Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J Clim 21: 3504-3520. doi: 10. 1175/2007JCLI2110. 1.
46. Stephens GL (2005) Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: a critical review. J Clim 18: 237-273.
47. Stephens GL, Ellis TD (2008) Controls of global-mean precipitation increases in global warming GCM experiments. J Clim 21: 6141-6155.
48. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2009) A summary of the CMIP5 experimental design. Available at http://www-pcmdi. llnl. gov/.
49. Webb M, Senior CA, Bony S, Morcrette J-J (2001) Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess cloud in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models. Clim Dyn 17: 905-922.
50. Webb MJ et al (2006) On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Clim Dyn 27: 17-38. doi: 10. 1007/s00382-006-0111-2.
51. Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a GCM. J Atmos Sci 45: 1397-1415.
52. Williams KD, Ingram WJ, Gregory JM (2008) Time variation of effective climate sensitivity in GCMs. J Clim 21: 5076-5090. doi: 10. 1175/2008JCLI2371. 1.
53. Winton M, Takahashi K, Held IM (2010) Importance of ocean heat uptake efficacy to transient climate change. J Clim 23: 2333-2344. doi: 10. 1175/2009JCLI3139. 1.
54. Yang F, Kumar A, Schlesinger ME, Wang W (2003) Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates. J Clim 16: 2419-2423.