Sequence design of quantitative and qualitative surveys for increasing efficiency in forest policy researc

Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung

Volumn 183, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 75-83

  Schusser, Carsten ^a   Krott, Max ^a   Devkota, Rosan ^a   Maryudi, Ahmad ^a   Salla, Manjola ^a   Movuh, Mbolo C Yufanyi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Community forestry; Mixed methods; Power analysis; Power features; Quantitative and qualitative analysis; Sequence design; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862649038     PISSN: 00025852     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. BRYMAN, A. (2001): Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, New York.
2. DEFFAA, W. (1982): Die Berücksichtigung monopolistischer und oligopolistischer Strukturen in der statistischen Konzentrationsmessung. In: Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, vol. 66, pp. 330.
3. DEVKOTA, R. R. (2010): Interests and Power as Drivers of Community Forestry. Universitätsdrucke Göttingen, Göttingen.
4. DULLER, C. and J. KEPLER (2005): Die österreichische private Krankenversicherung - Ein Monopol? Austrian Journal of Statistics, vol. 34, (4) pp: 348-351.
5. EDMUNDS, D. and E. WOLLENBERG (2001): Historical perspectives on forest policy change in Asia: an introduction. Environmental History, vol. 6, pp. 190-212. (Pubitemid 32399681)
6. HANI, P. K. (1987): Die Messung der Unternehmenskonzentration, Grüsen, Schweiz.
7. HASANAGAS, N. (2004): Power factor typology through organizational and network analysis - Using environmental policy networks as an illustration. Stuttgart: Ibidem, 2004.
8. KROTT, M., A. BADER, R. DEVKOTA, C. SCHUSSER, A. MARYU-DI, C. M. YUFANYI MOHVUH and M. SALLA (2011): Manuscript: Actor-centered power analysis in forest policy - a theory-based concept, Forest Policy and Economics, 15 pages, in review.
9. KROTT, M. (2005): Forest Policy Analysis, Springer.
10. KROTT, M. (2011): Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics 00682 8 pages, in print.
11. MARSDEN, P. (1990): Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 16, pp. 435-463.
12. MARSDEN, P. (2011): Survey Methods for Network Data. In: SOCOTT, J. AND CARRINGTON P. J. (eds). The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis.
13. MARYUDI, A. (2011): The Contesting Aspirations in the Forests. Universitätsdrucke Göttingen, Göttingen.
14. MCVILLY, K. R. ET AL. (2008): Remaining open to quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method designs: An unscientific compromise or good research practice? In: International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol. 35, p. 151-203.
15. MODELL, S. (2009): In defense of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, pp. 208-221.
16. MORSE, J. (1991): Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, p 40 and pp. 135-145.
17. NAUMAN, W. L. (2006): Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education (6. edition).
18. PATTON, M. (1995): Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd edition, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
19. PETERS, B. G. (1995): The Politics of Bureaucracy, Longman Publishers, White Plains, N. Y..
20. PLESCH, W. (1975): Statistische Konzentrationsmaße: formale Eigenschaften und verteilungstheoretische Zusammenhänge, Mohr, Tübingen.
21. SCHMIDT, I. (2005): Wettbewerbspolitik und Kartellrecht. Stuttgart.
22. THOMMEN, J.-K. und A.-K. ACHLEITNER (2006): Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag D. Th. Gabler/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden.
23. WOLLENBERG, E., R. IWAN, G. LIMBERG and M. MOELIONO (2008): Locating social choice in forest co-management and local governance: the politics of public decision making and interests. In: Sikor, T. (ed.). Public and private in natural resource governance: a false dichotomy? Earthscan Research Editions, London, pp. 27-43.