Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and neural network in power transformer risk assessment

Journal of Central South University of Technology (English Edition)

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 982-987

  Li, Wei Guo ^a   Yu, Qian ^a,b   Luo, Ri Cheng ^c  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Hunan Electric Company   (China)

^c CHANGSHA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial neutral network; Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; Power transformer; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ABILITY; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; ARTIFICIAL NEUTRAL NETWORK; FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; JUDGMENT MATRIX; MAINTENANCE DECISIONS; NEUTRAL NETWORK; NONLINEAR MAPPINGS; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS; RISK CALCULATION; RISK FACTORS; RISK LEVELS; TRANSFORMER FAULTS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; NEURAL NETWORKS; POWER TRANSFORMERS; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84862646049     PISSN: 10059784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-012-1100-8     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. HENLEY E J, KUMAMOTO H. Probabilistic risk assessment [M]. New York: IEEE, 1992: 467-480.
2. HOANG P. Handbook of reliability engineering [M]. Berlin: Springer, 2002: 310-335.
3. LIU N, ZHANG J H, XU W. Asset analysis of risk assessment for IEC 61850-based power control systems. Part II: Application in substation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2011, 26(2): 876-881.
4. LAPWORTH J A, WILSON A. The asset health review for managing reliability risks associated with ongoing use of ageing system power transformers [C]//2008 International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis. Beijing, China: IEEE Computer Society, 2008: 605-608.
5. WANG You-yuan, YUAN Yuan, Li Jian. Study on power transformer fuzzy risk assessment based on borda number theory [C]//2008 International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application. Chongqing, China: IEEE Computer Society, 2008: 609-612.
6. KANG C Q, YANG G F, XIA Q. Development of multidimensional sequence operation theory with applications to risk evaluation in power system generation scheduling [J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2008, 51(6): 724-734. (Pubitemid 351653114)
7. MIRANDA V, PROENCA L M. Why risk analysis outperforms probabilistic choice as the effective decision support paradigm for power system planning? [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1998, 13(2): 643-648. (Pubitemid 128748917)
8. CHRIS J D, JANUSZ W B. Non-iterative method for modeling systematic data errors in power system risk assessment [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011, 26(1): 120-127.
9. XIAO F, JAMES D M. Power system risk assessment and control in a multiobjective framework [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(1): 78-85.
10. AHN Hyun-Mo, LEE Ji-Yeon, KIM Joong-Kyoung. Finite-element analysis of short-circuit electromagnetic force in power transformer [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2011, 47(3): 1267-1272.
11. BASTARD P, BERTRAND P P, MEUNIER M. A transformer model for winding fault studies [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 1994, 9(2): 690-699.
12. XIONG Hao, SUN Cai-xin. Artificial immune network classification algorithm for fault diagnosis of power transformer [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2007, 22(2): 930-935.
13. SAATY T L. The analytic hierarchy process [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980: 372-397.
14. LEE S K, MOGI G, KOIKE M. Fuzzy integrated analytic hierarchy process approach for selecting strategic big-sized R&D programs in the sector of energy technology development [C]//2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. Jeju: Korea Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Inc, 2009: 1432-1438.
15. ATIYA A F. Bankruptcy prediction for credit risk using neural networks: A survey and new results [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2001, 12(4): 929-935. (Pubitemid 32732830)
16. LI Z Y, PENG L H. An exploration of the uncertainty relation satisfied by BP network learning ability and generalization ability [J]. Sci China Ser F-Inf Sci, 2004, 47(2): 137-150.
17. CHEN S J, HWANG C L. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making [M]. Berlin: Springer, 1992: 412.
18. LU Y J. Weight calculate method of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process [J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2002, 16(2): 79-85. (in Chinese)
19. ZIMMERMANN H J. Fuzzy sets, decision making and expert systems [M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987: 295.
20. LAN J W, XU Y, HUO L A. Research on the priorities of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2006, 26(9): 107-112. (in Chinese)
21. XU Ze-shui. A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrices [J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, 2002, 16(1): 47-50. (in Chinese)