Australia at the crossroads: A review of school science practical work

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-47

  Kidman, Gillian ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australian curriculum; Inquiry based pedagogy; Practical work; Science; Science inquiry skills

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862634844     PISSN: 13058215     EISSN: 13058223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2012.815a     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abrahams, I. & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1945-1969.
2. Abrams, E., Southerland, S.A. & Evans, C.A. (2007). Inquiry in the classroom: Identifying necessary components of a useful definition. In E. Abrams, S.A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the science classroom: Realities and opportunities (pp. ix-xi). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
3. Atkinson, E.P. (1990). Learning scientific knowledge in the student laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 119-131). London: Routledge.
4. Beatty, J.W. & Woolnough, B.E. (1982). Practical work in 11-13 science. British Educational Research Journal, 8, 23-30.
5. Carmichael, P., Driver, R., Holding, B., Phillips, I., Twigger, D. & Watts, D.M. (1990). Research on Students' Conceptions in Science: A Bibliography. Leeds: University of Leeds.
6. Coles, M. (1997). Science education - vocational and general approaches. School Science Review, 79, 27-32.
7. Donnelly, J., Buchan, A., Jenkins, E. Laws, P. & Welford, G. (1996). Investigations by Order. Nafferton: Studies in Education.
8. Driver, R. (1975). The name of the game. School Science Review, 56, 800-804.
9. Erickson, G. (1994). Pupils' understanding of magnetism in a practical assessment context: the relationship between content, process and progression. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone and R. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 80-97). London: The Falmer Press.
10. Fairbrother, R. & Hackling, M. (1997). Is this the right answer? International Journal of Science Education, 19 (8), 887-894.
11. Gee, B. & Clackson, S.G. (1992). The origin of practical work in the English school science curriculum. School Science Review, 73, 79-83.
12. Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education. 18, 791-806.
13. Gott, R. & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
14. Gunstone. R.F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical Science (pp. 67-77). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
15. Hodson, D. (1993). Rethinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142.
16. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2002). Science education from 14 to 19. Third report of Session 2001-02. Volume 1: Report and proceedings of the committee. London: The Stationery Office Ltd.
17. Jenkins, E.W. (1979). From Armstrong to Nuffield. London: John Murray.
18. Jones, M.E., Gott, R. & Jarman, R. (2000). Investigations as part of the Key Stage 4 science curriculum in Northern Ireland. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14. 23-37.
19. Keiler, L.S. & Woolnough, B.E. (2002). Practical work in school science: The dominance of assessment. School Science Review, 83, 83-88.
20. Lawson, A.E. (2010). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94, 336-364.
21. Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem-solving investigations. What do we mean and how can we use them? School Science Review, 71, 63-72.
22. Millar, R. (1989). Bending the evidence: The relationship between theory and experiment in science education. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 38-61). London: Falmer Press.
23. Millar, R. (1991). A means to an end: The role of processes in science education. In B.E. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science. (pp. 44-52). Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Millar, R. (2010). Analysing practical science activities. Hatfield: Association for Science Education. Millar, R. & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education 14, 33-62.
25. National Curriculum Council (1993). Teaching science at key stages 3 and 4. York: National Curriculum Council.
26. Nott, M. & Wellington, J. (1999). The state we're in: Issues in key stage 3 and 4 science. School Science Review, 81, 13-18.
27. Nott, M., Peacock, G., Smith, R., Wardle, J., Wellington, J. & Wilson, P. (1998). Investigations into KS3 and KS4 Science. A report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Projects 10905 and 10906. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.
28. Ofsted (1999). Standards in the secondary curriculum: 1997/98 science. London: Ofsted Publications Centre.
29. Roth, W-M., McRobbie, C.J., Lucas, K.B. & Boutonne, S. (1997). The local production of order in traditional science laboratories: a phenomenological analysis. Learning and Instruction, 7, 107-136.
30. Shayer, M. (1999). Cognitive acceleration through science education II: Its effects and scope. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 883-902.
31. Simon, S.A. & Jones, A.T. (1992). Open work in science: A review of existing practice. London: Kings College.
32. Thijs, G.D. & Bosch, G.M. (1995). Cognitive effects of science experiments focusing on students' preconceptions of force: A comparison of demonstrations and small-group practicals. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 311-323.
33. Thompson, J.J. (Ed.) (1975). Practical work in sixth form science. Oxford: University of Oxford.
34. Toplis, R. & Cleaves, A. (2006). Science investigation: The views of fourteen to sixteen year old pupils. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24, 69-84.
35. Watson, J.R., Swain, J.R.L. & McRobbie, C. (2004). Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 25-45.
36. Watson, R. (2000). The role of practical work. In M. Monk. & J. Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 57-71). Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Wellington, J. (1981). 'What's supposed to happen Sir?' School Science Review, 63, 167-173.
38. Wellington, J. (1994). Interpreting the statements of the National Curriculum. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 3-16). London: Routledge.
39. Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: time for a reappraisal. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3-15). London: Routledge.
40. Woolnough, B. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press