Coherent interpretation of DSM plan to PDP simulation

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Karniel, Arie ^a   Reich, Yoram ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Design structure matrix; Process planning; Process scheme; Process verification; Product design process; Workflow

Indexed keywords

DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRICES; PROCESS SCHEMES; PROCESS VERIFICATIONS; PRODUCT DESIGN PROCESS; WORKFLOW;

PROCESS PLANNING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84862623645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Aalst W.M.P. van der, The Application of Petri Nets to workflow management, The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 8(1):21-66, 1998.
2. Aalst W.M.P. van der, Exterminating the dynamic change bug: A concrete approach to support workflow change, Information Systems Frontiers, 3(3):297-317, 2001.
3. Aalst W.M.P. van der, and Hee K.M. van, Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2002.
4. Aalst, W.M.P. van der, Hofstede A.H.M. ter, Kiepuszewski B., Barros A.P., Workflow patterns, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(1):5-51, 2003.
5. Abdelsalam H.M.E., and Bao H.P., A simulation-based optimization framework for product development cycle time reduction, IEEE Trans. on Eng, Management, 53(1):69-85, 2006.
6. Beck K., Extreme Programming Explained, Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
7. Browning T.R., Applying the Design Structure Matrix system to decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions, IEEE Trans. on Eng. Management, 48:292-306, 2001.
8. Browning T.R., and Eppinger S.D., Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development, IEEE Trans. on Eng. Management, 49(4):428-442, 2002.
9. Browning T.R., Fricke E., and Negele H., Key concepts in modeling product development processes, Systems Engineering, 9(2):104-128, 2006.
10. Cho S.H., Eppinger S.D., A simulation-based process model for managing complex design Projects, IEEE Trans. on Eng. Management, 52(3):316-328, 2005.
11. Clarkson P.J. and Hamilton J.R., 'Signposting', a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process, Research in Engineering Design, 12(1):18-38, 2000.
12. Eckert C.M., Keller R., Earl C., Clarkson P.J., Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability, Reliability Eng. and System Safety, 91(12):1521-1534, 2006.
13. Eppinger S.D., Nukala M.V., and Whitney D.E., Generalized models of design iterations using signal flow graph, Research in Engineering Design, 9:112-123, 1997.
14. Eppinger S.D., Whitney D.E., Smith R., and Gebala D., A Model-based method for organizing tasks in product development, Research in Engineering Design, 6(1):1-13, 1994.
15. Karniel A., Belsky Y., Reich Y., Decomposing the problem of constrained surface fitting in reverse engineering, Computer-Aided Design, 37: 399-417, 2005.
16. Karniel A., Reich Y., From DSM based planning to design process simulation: A review of process scheme verification issues, submitted, 2006a.
17. Karniel A., Reich Y., DSM based implementation of process schemes, submitted, 2006b.
18. Karniel A., Reich Y., Karniel A., Reich Y.: Managing Dynamic New Product Development Processes. submitted, (2006c)
19. Karniel A., Reich Y.: Simulating Design Processes with self-iteration activities based on DSM planning. in proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Engineering and Modeling - ICSEM'07. Haifa (2007)
20. Lévárdy V., Browning T.R., Adaptive test process - designing a project plan that adapts to the state of a project, Fifteenth Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), 10 July to 15 July, 2005.
21. Meier C., Yassine A., Browning T., Design Process Sequencing with Competent Genetic Algorithms, PDRL working paper # PDL-2006-03, March, 2006.
22. Reising W., Rozenberg G., editors, Lectures on Petri Nets I: Basic Models, Lecture notes in Computer Science, vol 1491, 1998.
23. Rinderle S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P., Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - A Survey, Data and Knowledge Engineering, 50(1):9-34, 2004(a).
24. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P., Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 16(1): 91-116, 2004(b).
25. Sadiq W. and Orlowska M. E., Applying Graph Reduction Techniques for Identifying Structural Conflicts in Process Models, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1626:195-209, 1999.
26. Sadiq S., Orlowska M.E., Sadiq W., Foulger C., Data flow and validation in workflow modeling, Proceedings of the International Conference in Research and Practice in Information Technology, ADC'2004, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2004.
27. Sarbanes P. (S. 2673), Oxley M.G (H.R. 3763), Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, ("Sarbanes Oxley Act"), Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745, July 30, 2002. http://frwebgate.access.gpo. gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107-cong-bills&docid=f:h3763enr.tst.pdf
28. Sered Y., and Reich Y., Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort, Computer-Aided Design, 38(5):405-416, 2006.
29. Smith R.P. and Eppinger S.D., A Predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design, Management Science, 43(8): 1104-1120, 1997
30. Steward D.V., Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy, and Design, Petrocelli Books, NJ, 1981(a).
31. Steward D. V., The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems, IEEE Trans. on Eng. Management, 28:71-74, 1981(b).
32. WFMC, Workflow Management Coalition Terminology and Glossary, Technical report WFMC-TC-1011, issue 3, Workflow Management Coalition, 1999.
33. Whitfield R.I., Duffy A.H.B., Gartzia-Etxabe L. K., Identifying and evaluating parallel design activities using the Design Structure Matrix, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 05, Melbourne, August 15-18, 2005.
34. Yassine A., Braha D., Complex concurrent engineering and the Design Structure Matrix method, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 11(3):165-176, 2003.
35. Yassine A., Investigating product development process reliability and robustness using simulation, Journal of Engineering Design, 2006.