Real-time implementation of an intent recognition system for artificial legs

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2997-3000

  Zhang, Fan ^a   Dou, Zhi ^a   Nunnery, Michael ^b   Huang, He ^a  

^a The University of Rhode Island   (United States)

^b Nunnery Orthotics and Prosthetics Technologies   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL LEGS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC SIGNAL; GROUND REACTION FORCES; INTENT RECOGNITION; LOCOMOTION MODE; NEURAL CONTROL; PROSTHESIS CONTROL; PROSTHETIC LEG; REAL-TIME IMPLEMENTATIONS; RECOGNITION ACCURACY; STAIR DESCENT; STATIC STATE; SYSTEM-BASED;

ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; STAIRS;

REAL TIME CONTROL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LIMB PROSTHESIS; WALKING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; WALKING;

EID: 84862594227     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090822     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Au, S., M. Berniker, and H. Herr, Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits. Neural Netw, 2008. 21(4): p. 654-66.
2. Martinez-Villalpando, E.C. and H. Herr, Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2009. 46(3): p. 361-73.
3. Sup, F., A. Bohara, and M. Goldfarb, Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis. Int J Rob Res, 2008. 27(2): p. 263-273.
4. Popovic, D., Og uztöreli, M.N. and Stein, R.B., Optimal control for the active above-knee prosthesis. Ann. Biomed, 1991.. Engng 19, pp. 131-149.
5. Bedard, S. and P. Roy, Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees, in 7,314,490. 2003: U. S.
6. Varol, H.A., F. Sup, and M. Goldfarb, Multiclass real-time intent recognition of a powered lower limb prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2010. 57(3): p. 542-51.
7. Williams, T.W., 3rd, Practical methods for controlling powered upper-extremity prostheses. Assist Technol, 1990. 2(1): p. 3-18.
8. Parker, P.A. and R.N. Scott, Myoelectric control of prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng, 1986. 13(4): p. 283-310.
9. Hudgins, B., P. Parker, and R.N. Scott, A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1993. 40(1): p. 82-94.
10. Englehart, K. and B. Hudgins, A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2003. 50(7): p. 848-54.
11. Huang, H., T.A. Kuiken, and R.D. Lipschutz, A strategy for identifying locomotion modes using surface electromyography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2009. 56(1): p. 65-73.
12. Zhang F, DiSanto W, Ren J, Dou Z, Yang Q, Huang H, A Novel CPS System for Evaluating a Neural-Machine Interface for Artificial Legs. Proceeding of 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, 2011, to be published.
13. Oskoei, M.A. and H. Hu, Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limb. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2008. 55(8): p. 1956-65.
14. Crawford, B., et al. Real-Time Classification of Electromyographic Signals for Robotic Control. in Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2005.
15. Hargrove, L.J., K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins, A comparison of surface and intramuscular myoelectric signal classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2007. 54(5): p. 847-53.