Major complications associated with xenograft biologic mesh implantation in abdominal wall reconstruction

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 324-329

  Harth, Karem C ^a   Rosen, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal wall reconstruction; Biologic mesh; Cross linking; Hernia repair; Infection

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT INFECTION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; XENOGRAFT;

ABDOMINAL WALL; HUMANS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;

EID: 76149111178     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350609353609     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Millenium Research Group. US markets for soft tissue repair 2009. http://www.mrg.net/TOC-BR/TOC-RPUS43ST08.pdf. Published October 2008. Accessed October 24, 2009.
2. Hiles M., Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2009 ; 16: 26-37.
3. Bellows CF, Alder A., Helton WS Abdominal wall reconstruction using biological tissue grafts: present status and future opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 ; 3: 657-675.
4. Gaertner W., Bonsack M., Delaney J. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 ; 11: 1275-1285.
5. Petterpuchner A., Fortelny R., Walder N., et al. Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2008 ; 145: 105-110.
6. Richter G., Smith J., Spencer H., Fan C., Vural E. Histological comparison of implanted cadaveric and porcine dermal matrix grafts. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 ; 137: 239-242.
7. Kaleya R. Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen prosthesis in the rat. Hernia. 2005 ; 9: 269-276.
8. Macleod TM, Williams G., Sanders R., Green CJ Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20-week period in the rat model. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 ; 58: 518-532.
9. Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P., Zheng F., Verbeken EK, De Ridder D., Deprest JA Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. BJOG. 2005 ; 112: 1554-1560.
10. Liyanage S., Purohit G., Frye J., Giordano P. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006 ; 59: 553-555.
11. Gupta A., Zahriya K., Mullens PL, Salmassi S., Keshishian A. Ventral herniorrhaphy: experience with two different biosynthetic mesh materials, Surgisis and Alloderm. Hernia. 2006 ; 10: 419-425.
12. Diaz JJ, Guy J., Berkes MB, Guillamondegui O., Miller RS Acellular dermal allograft for ventral hernia repair in the compromised surgical field. Am Surg. 2006 ; 72: 1181-1187 ; discussion 1187-1188.
13. Cobb GA, Shaffer J. Cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: case-controlled study of operative variables and early complications. Int Surg. 2005 ; 90 (3 suppl). S24 - S29.
14. Parker D., Armstrong P., Frizzi J., Northjr J. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg. 2006 ; 63: 255-258.
15. Catena F., Ansaloni L., Gazzotti F., et al. Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia. 2007 ; 11: 57-60.
16. Hsu P., Salgado C., Kent K., et al. Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction [published online ahead of print August 19, 2008, PMID No. 18718829]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
17. Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R., Horgan S., Espat NJ, Abcarian H. Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg. 2005 ; 140: 549-560 ; discussion 560-562.
18. Ueno T. Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 ; 8: 109-112.
19. Jarman-Smith ML, Bodamyali T., Stevens C., Howell JA, Horrocks M., Chaudhuri JB Porcine collagen crosslinking, degradation and its capability for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004 ; 15: 925-932.
20. Liang HC, Chang Y., Hsu CK, Lee MH, Sung HW Effects of crosslinking degree of an acellular biological tissue on its tissue regeneration pattern. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25: 3541-3552.
21. Sandor M., Xu H., Connor J., et al. Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 ; 14: 2021-2031.
22. Adedeji OA, Bailey CA, Varma JS Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal-wall reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2002 ; 55: 85-86.