Coupling surfactants/cosolvents with oxidants for enhanced DNAPL removal: A review

Remediation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 27-49

  Dugan, Pamela J ^a   Siegrist, Robert L ^a   Crimi, Michelle L ^b  

^a Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862567203     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.20249     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Abriola, L. M., Drummond, C. D., Hahn, E. J., Hayes, K. F., Kibbey, T.C.G., Lemke, L. D., et al. (2005). Pilot-scale demonstration of surfactant-enhanced PCE solubilization at the Bachman Road site. 1. Site characterization and test design. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 1778–1790.
2. Battelle & Duke. (2001). Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), Final technical report for surfactant-enhanced DNAPL removal at Site 88 Marine Corps Base, Camp LeJeune, North Carolina. Technical Report TR-2206-ENV.
3. Broholm, K., & Cherry, J. A. (1994). Enhanced dissolution of heterogeneously distributed solvents residuals by methanol flushing: A field experiment. In T. Dracos & F. Stauffer (Eds.), Transport and reactive processes in aquifers (pp. 563–568). Brookfield, VT: A. A. Balkema.
4. Brooks, M. C., Annable, M. D., Rao, P. S. C., Hatfield, K., Jawitz, J. W., Wise, W. R., et al. (2004). Controlled release, blind test of DNAPL remediation by ethanol flushing. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 69, 281–297.
5. Brown, R. A., & Lees, R. (1998). Combining and sequencing technologies to treat chlorinated VOCs. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, pp. 301–308.
6. Carvel, D. D., & Cartwright, R. T. (2008). Innovative heavy oil contaminant remediation at typical MGP remediation sites. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.mecx.net/papers/services/MecX-MGPRemediation.pdf
7. Childs, J., Acosta, E., Annable, M., Brooks, M., Enfield, C., Harwell, J. H., et al. (2006). Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced solubilization of DNAPL at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 82(1–2), 1–22.
8. Collins, J., & Hoag, G. (2007, June). Green chemistry, coelution technologies, and surfactant-enhanced in situ oxidation (S-ISCO) as new breakthrough technologies in the treatment of toxic subsurface contaminants. Paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Green Chemistry and Engineering Conference, Washington, DC.
9. Conrad, S. H., Glass, R. J., & Peplinski, W. J. (2002). Bench-scale visualization of DNAPL remediation processes in analog heterogeneous aquifers: Surfactant floods and in situ oxidation using permanganate. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 58, 13–49.
10. Cowdery, R. C., Applegate, J. L., & Warner, K. M. (2004). Co-oxidation method and co-oxidation reagent for decontamination of soil and groundwater. U.S. Patent No. 2004/869/535/B2.
11. Crimi, M. L., Quickel, M., & Ko, S. (2009). Enhanced permanganate in situ chemical oxidation through MnO2 particle stabilization: Evaluation in 1-D transport systems. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 105(1–2), 69–79.
12. Dugan, P. J. (2008). Coupling surfactants/cosolvents with oxidants: Effects on remediation and performance assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
13. Dugan, P. J., Siegrist, R. L., & Crimi, M. L. (2005, October). Coupling surfactants/cosolvents with permanganate for DNAPL removal: Co-injection and sequential application. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Oxidation and Reduction Technologies for In Situ Treatment of Soil and Groundwater, Chicago, IL.
14. Dugan, P. J., Siegrist, R. L., & Crimi, M. L. (2009). Method and compositions for treatment of subsurface contaminants. U.S. Patent #2009/7553105.
15. Dwarakanath, V., Britton, L. N., Jayanti, S., Ooi, K., Pope, G. A., & Weerasooriya, V. (2000). Thermally-enhanced surfactant remediation. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
16. ERM. (2001). Case study: ISCO with permanganate confidential client (Mountain View, CA); personal communication via e-mail, Kris Perritt, March 2010.
17. ERM. (2004). Case study: ISCO with persulfate and ZVI, former battery manufacturing site (Lexington, KY); personal communication via e-mail, Kris Perritt, March 2010.
18. Escalante, M., & Rodriguez-Malaver, E. M. (2005). Effect of surfactants on Fenton's reagent-mediated degradation of Kraft black liquor. Journal of Environmental Biology, 26, 709–718.
19. Falta, R. W., Lee, C. M., Brame, S. E., Roeder, E., Coates, J. T., Wright, C., et al. (1999). Field test of high molecular weight alcohol flushing for subsurface nonaqueous phase liquid remediation. Water Resources Research, 35, 2095–2108.
20. FMC. (2007). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate-industrial facility (Atlanta, GA); personal communication via e-mail, Phil Block, March 2010.
21. Gavaskar, A., & Yoon, W.-S. (2001). Dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone at Launch Complex 34 in Cape Canaveral Air Force Station: Demonstration of ISCO treatment (No. Rep. No. AFRL-ML-TY-TR-2003-4522). Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.
22. Geo-Cleanse. (2006). Case study: ISCO with Fenton's reagent—Confidential site (Tallahassee, FL); personal communication via e-mail, Dan Bryant, March 2010.
23. Geo-Cleanse. (2008). Case study: ISCO with Fenton's reagent followed by ISCO with permanganate—Orlando Events Center (Tallahassee, FL); personal communication via e-mail, Dan Bryant, March 2010.
24. Geo-Cleanse. (2009). Case study: ISCO with Fenton's reagent—Confidential client; personal communication via e-mail, Dan Bryant, March 2010.
25. Greenberg, R. S., Andrews, T., Kakarla, P. K. C., & Watts, R. J. (1998). In-situ Fenton-like oxidation of volatile organics: Laboratory, pilot, and full-scale demonstrations. Remediation, 8(2), 29–42.
26. Guest, P. R., Friesen, K. A., & Blicker, B. R. (1993). An integrated approach to remediating a no. 2 fuel oil release in soil and groundwater. In E. J. Calabrese & P. T. Kostecki (Eds.), Hydrocarbon contaminated soils: Perspectives, analysis/site assessment, human health risk assessment, environmental fate and exposure, regulatory (Vol. 3, pp. 363–378). Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
27. Heiderscheidt, J. L. (2005). DNAPL source zone depletion during in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO): Experimental and modeling studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
28. Hesemann, J. R., & Hildebrandt, M. (2009). Successful unsaturated zone treatment of PCE with sodium permanganate. Remediation, 19(2), 37–48.
29. Hoag, G. E., Collins, J., & Huang, K. (2006). Surfactant-enhanced in situ chemical oxidation (S-ISCO®) for remediation of manufactured gas plant residuals. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Oxidation and Reduction Technologies for In Situ Treatment of Soil and Groundwater.
30. Huling, S. G., & Pivetz, B. E. (2006). In situ chemical oxidation: Engineering issue. Rep. No. EPA/600/R-06/072. Cincinnati, OH: Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, US EPA.
31. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC). (2005). Technical and regulatory guidance for in situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
32. Jawitz, J. W., Annable, M. D., Rao, P. S. C., & Rhue, D. (1998). Field implementation of a Winsor type I surfactant/alcohol mixture for in-situ solubilization of a complex LNAPL as a single-phase microemulsion. Environmental Science & Technology, 32, 523–530.
33. Jawitz, J. W., Sillan, R. K., Annable, M. D., Rao, P. S. C., & Warner, K. (2000). In-situ alcohol flushing of a DNAPL source zone at a dry cleaner site. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 3722–3729.
34. Juršić, B. (1989). Surfactant assisted permanganate oxidation of aromatic compounds. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 67, 1381–1383.
35. Kakarla, P. K. C., Andrews, T., Greenberg, R. S., & Zervas, D. S. (2002). Modified Fenton's processes for effective in-situ chemical oxidation: Laboratory and field evaluation. Remediation, 12(4), 23–36.
36. Kavanaugh, M. C., Rao, P. S. C., Abriola, L., Cherry, J., Destouni, G., Falta, R., et al. (2003, December). The DNAPL remediation challenge: Source removal or long term management. EPA/600/R-03/143. Report of an Expert Panel to the U.S. EPA National Risk Management Laboratory and Technology Innovation Office.
37. Kovalick, W. W. Jr., (2008). Review of characterization and remediation technologies for NAPL's in groundwater. In M. D. Annable, M. Teodorescu, P. Hlavinek, & L. Diels (Eds.), Methods and techniques for cleaning-up contaminated sites (pp. 165–175). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
38. Krebs-Yuill, B., Harwell, J. H., Sabatini, D. A., & Knox, R. C. (1995). Economic considerations in surfactant enhanced pump-and-treat. In D. A. Sabatini, R. C. Knox, & J. H. Harwell (Eds.), Surfactant enhanced subsurface remediation: Emerging technologies (pp. 265–278). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
39. Kyin, B., Maung, A. T., Begum, B., Haque, M., Hemalika, S., & Sudrajat, H. (2009). Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon polluted soil using Fenton's reagent. Journal of Applied Sciences in Environmental Sanitation, V(N), 63–68.
40. Lee, B.-D., & Hosomi, M. (2000). Ethanol washing of PAH-contaminated soil and Fenton oxidation of washing solution. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2, 24–30.
41. Lee, E. S., Seol, Y., Fang, Y. C., & Schwartz, F. W. (2003). Destruction efficiencies and dynamics of reaction fronts associated with the permanganate oxidation of trichloroethylene. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 2540–2546.
42. Li, X. D., & Schwartz, F. W. (2000, May). Efficiency problems related to permanganate oxidation schemes. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA.
43. Li, Z. (2004). Surfactant-enhanced oxidation of trichloroethylene by permanganate—Proof of concept. Chemosphere, 54, 419–423.
44. Li, Z., & Hanlie, H. (2008). Combination of surfactant solubilization with permanganate oxidation for DNAPL remediation. Water Research, 42, 605–614.
45. Liang, C., Huang, C.-F., & Chen, Y.-J. (2008). Potential for activated persulfate degradation of BTEX contamination. Water Research, 42, 4091–4100.
46. Liang, C., Huang, C.-F., Mohanty, N., Lu, C.-J., & Kurakalva, R. M. (2007). Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin-mediated iron-activated persulfate oxidation of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46, 6466–6479.
47. Martens, D. A., & Frankenberger, W. T. (1995). Enhanced degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil treated with an advanced oxidative process—Fenton's reagent. Journal of Soil Contamination, 4(2), 175–190.
48. Mott-Smith, E., Leonard, W. C., Lewis, R. W., Clayton, W. S., Ramirez, J., & Brown, R. A. (2000, May). In situ oxidation of DNAPL using permanganate: IDC Cape Canaveral demonstration. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA.
49. National Research Council (NRC). (2005). Contaminants in the subsurface: Source zone assessment and remediation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
50. Pope, G. A., & Wade, W. H. (1995). Lessons from enhanced oil recovery research for surfactant enhanced aquifer remediation. In D. A. Sabatini, R. C. Knox, & J. H. Harwell (Eds.), Surfactant-enhanced subsurface remediation: Emerging technologies (pp. 142–160). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
51. Ramsberg, C. A., & Pennell, K. D. (2001). Experimental and economic assessment of two surfactant formulations for source zone remediation at a former dry cleaning facility. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, 21(4), 68–82.
52. Ramsberg, C. A., Pennell, K. D., Abriola, L. M., Daniels, G., Drummond, C. D., Gamache, M., et al. (2005). Surfactant-enhanced PCE solubilization at the Bachman Road site. 2. System operation and evaluation. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 1791–1801.
53. Rao, P.S.C., Annable, M. D., Sillan, R. K., Dai, D., Hatfield, K., Graham, W. D., et al. (1997). Field-scale evaluation of in-situ cosolvent flushing for enhanced aquifer remediation. Water Resources Research, 33, 2673–2686.
54. RedoxTech. (2005). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate—Warehouse (Raleigh, NC); personal communication received via e-mail, John Haselow, March 2010.
55. RedoxTech. (2007). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate—Service station (Havana, FL); personal communication received via e-mail, John Haselow, March 2010.
56. RedoxTech. (2006). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate—Wood preserving facility (Wilmington, NC); personal communication received via e-mail, John Haselow, March 2010.
57. RedoxTech. (2009). Case study: ISCO with potassium permanganate—Superfund site (Kingston, RI); personal communication received via e-mail, John Haselow, March 2010.
58. Roote, D. S. (2003). Technology status report: Treatment trains for remediation of soil and groundwater. Pittsburgh, PA: Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center.
59. Sabatini, D. A., Knox, R. C., Harwell, J. H., & Wu, B. (2000). Integrated design of surfactant enhanced DNAPL remediation: Efficient supersolubilization and gradient systems. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45(1–2), 99–121.
60. Sale, T., Newell, C., Stroo, H., Hinchee, R., & Johnson, P. (2008). Frequently asked questions regarding management and chlorinated solvents in soil and groundwater. Department of Defense Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP).
61. Saxe, J. K., Allen, H. E., & Nicol, G. R. (2000). Fenton oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons after surfactant-enhanced soil washing. Environmental Engineering Science, 17(4), 233–244.
62. SESciences. (2004). Case study: ISCO with CHP—Trucking facility (Central Indiana); personal communication received via e-mail, Lindsay Swearingen, March 2010.
63. SESciences. (2005). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate—Former MGP plant (Louisville, KY); personal communication received via e-mail, Lindsay Swearingen, March 2010.
64. SESciences. (2008). Case study: ISCO with permanganate—Former Palm Beach clothing facility (Erlanger, KY); personal communication received via e-mail, Lindsay Swearingen, March 2010.
65. SESciences. (2009a). Case study: ISCO with activated persulfate—Dry cleaner (Brazil, IN); personal communication received via e-mail, Lindsay Swearingen, March 2010.
66. SESciences. (2009b). Case study: ISCO with permanganate—Dry cleaner (Hobart, IN); personal communication received via e-mail, Lindsay Swearingen, March 2010.
67. Shiau, B. J. (2008). In-situ surfactant and chemical oxidant flushing for complete remediation of contaminants and methods of using same. U.S. Patent No. 2008/7364386 B2.
68. Shiau, B.-J., Hasagawa, M. A., Brammer, J. M., Carter, T., Goodspeed, M., Harwell, J. H., et al. (2003a). Field demonstration of surfactant-enhanced DNAPL remediation: Two case studies. In S. M. Henry & S. D. Warner (Eds.), Chlorinated solvent and DNAPL remediation: Innovative strategies for subsurface cleanup (pp. 51–72). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
69. Shiau, B. J., Brammer, J. M., Sabatini, D. A., Harwell, J. C., & Knox, R. C. (2003b). Recent development of low concentration surfactant flushing for NAPL-impacted site remediation and pollution prevention. Paper presented at the Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water/Prevention, Assessment, and Remediation Twentieth Annual Conference and Exposition, Costa Mesa, CA.
70. Siegrist, R. L., Lowe, K. S., Murdoch, L. C., Case, T. L., & Pickering, D. A. (1999). In situ oxidation by fracture emplaced reactive solids. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125, 429–440.
71. Siegrist, R. L., Urynowicz, M. A., West, O. R., Crimi, M. L., & Lowe, K. S. (2001). Principles and practices of in situ chemical oxidation using permanganate. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
72. Stroo, H. F., Unger, M., Ward, C. H., Kavanaugh, M. C., Vogel, C., Leeson, A., et al. (2003). Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(11), 224A–230A.
73. Tick, G. R., Lourenso, F., Wood, A. L., & Brusseau, M. L. (2005). Pilot-scale demonstration of cyclodextrin as a solubility-enhancement agent for remediation of a tetrachloroethene-contaminated aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 5829–5834.
74. Tsai, T. T., Kao, C. M., & Hong, A. (2009). Treatment of tetrachloroethylene-contaminated groundwater by surfactant-enhanced persulfate/BOG slag oxidation—A laboratory feasibility study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 171, 571–576.
75. Tsai, T. T., Kao, C. M., Hong, A., Liang, S. H., & Chien, H. Y. (2008). Remediation of TCE-contaminated aquifer by an in situ three-stage treatment train system. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects, 322(1–3), 130–137.
76. Tsangaris, S., Nwokike, B., Bryant, D., & Levin, R. (2001, June). Fenton's reagent in-situ chemical oxidation of TCE source area, NTC Orlando, Florida. Paper presented at the International Containment & Remediation Technology Conference & Exhibition, Orlando, FL.
77. Tsitonaki, A., Petri, B. G., Crimi, M. L., Mosbaek, H., Siegrist, R. L., & Bjerg, P. L. (2010). In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater using persulfate: A review. Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 55–91.
78. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2001). Cost analysis for selected groundwater cleanup projects: Pump and treat systems and permeable reactive barriers. US EPA Rep. No. 542-R-00-013. Washington, DC: Author.
79. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2003a, January). Co-oxidation used to remove PCE DNAPL at drycleaner site: TechDirect and Newsletters, Technology News and Trend. Washington, DC: Author.
80. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2003b). The DNAPL remediation challenge: Is there a case for source depletion? US EPA Rep. No. EPA/600/R-03/143. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
81. Vitolins, A., Nelson, B. R., & Underhill, S. A. (2003). Fenton's reagent-based in situ chemical oxidation treatment of saturated and unsaturated soils at a historic railroad site. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 12(1), 139–150.
82. Waldemer, R. H., Tratnyek, P. G., Johnson, P., & Nurmi, J. T. (2007). Oxidation of chlorinated ethenes by heat-activated persulfate: Kinetics and products. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 1010–1015.
83. Watts, R. J., & Teel, A. L. (2006). Treatment of contaminated soils and groundwater using ISCO. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 10(1), 2–9.
84. Xie, G., & Barcelona, M. C. (2003). Sequential chemical oxidation and aerobic biodegradation of equivalent carbon number-based hydrocarbon fractions in jet fuel. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 4751–4760.
85. Young, C. M., Dwarakanath, V., Malik, T., Milner, L., Chittet, J., Jazdanian, A., et al. (2002, May). In situ remediation of coal tar-impacted soil by polymer-surfactant flooding. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Remediation of Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA.
86. Zhai, X., Hua, I., Rao, P. S. C., & Lee, L. S. (2006). Cosolvent-enhanced chemical oxidation of perchloroethylene by potassium permanganate. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 82(1–2), 61–74.