Visual gravity influences arm movement planning

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 107, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3433-3445

  Sciutti, Alessandra ^a   Demougeot, Laurent ^a,c,d   Berret, Bastien ^a   Toma, Simone ^a   Sandini, Giulio ^a   Papaxanthis, Charalambos ^c,d   Pozzo, Thierry ^a,b,c,d  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Internal model of gravity; Motor planning; Vertical; Visual rotation; Visuomotor conflict

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862540450     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00420.2011     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berret B, Darlot C, Jean F, Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Gauthier JP. The inactivation principle: mathematical solutions minimizing the absolute work and biological implications for the planning of arm movements. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000194, 2008.
2. Crevecoeur F, Thonnard JL, Lefevre P. Optimal integration of gravity in trajectory planning of vertical pointing movements. J Neurophysiol 102: 786-796, 2009.
3. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74: 2174-2178, 1995.
4. Gaveau J, Papaxanthis C. The temporal structure of vertical arm movements. PLoS One 6: e22045, 2011.
5. Gentili R, Cahouet V, Papaxanthis C. Motor planning of arm movements is direction-dependent in the gravity field. Neuroscience 145: 20-32, 2007.
6. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Generalization to local remappingsof the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci 16: 7085-7096, 1996.
7. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M. Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol 97: 331-347, 2007.
8. Hay JC, Pick HL Jr. Visual and proprioceptive adaptation to optical displacement of the visual stimulus. J Exp Psychol 71: 150-158, 1966.
9. Helmholtz H von. Treatise on Physiological Optics. New York, Dover, 1925.
10. Indovina I, Maffei V, Bosco G, Zago M, Macaluso E, Lacquaniti F. Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science 308: 416-419, 2005.
11. Izawa J, Rane T, Donchin O, Shadmehr R. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Neurosci 28: 2883-2891, 2008.
12. Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13: 522-525, 2003.
13. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20: 8916-8924, 2000.
14. Lackner JR, DiZio P. Motor control and learning in altered dynamic nvironments. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15: 653-659, 2005.
15. Le Seac'h AB, McIntyre J. Multimodal reference frame for the planning of vertical arms movements. Neurosci Lett 423: 211-215, 2007.
16. McIntyre J, Zago M, Berthoz A, Lacquaniti F. Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nat Neurosci 4: 693-694, 2001.
17. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42: 223-227, 1981.
18. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
19. Papaxanthis C, Dubost V, Pozzo T. Similar planning strategies for wholebody and arm movements performed in the sagittal plane. Neuroscience 117: 779-783, 2003a.
20. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, McIntyre J. Arm end-point trajectories under normal and micro-gravity environments. Acta Astronaut 43: 153-161, 1998a.
21. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, McIntyre J. Kinematic and dynamic processes for the control of pointing movements in humans revealed by short-term exposure to microgravity. Neuroscience 135: 371-383, 2005.
22. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Popov KE, McIntyre J. Hand trajectories of vertical arm movements in one-G and zero-G environments. Evidence for a central representation of gravitational force. Exp Brain Res 120: 496-502, 1998b.
23. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Schieppati M. Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed. Exp Brain Res 148: 498-503, 2003b.
24. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Stapley P. Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man. Neurosci Lett 253: 103-106, 1998c.
25. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Vinter A, Grishin A. The representation of gravitational force during drawing movements of the arm. Exp Brain Res 120: 233-242, 1998d.
26. Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L. Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. I. Normal subjects. Exp Brain Res 82: 97-106, 1990.
27. Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Petit JL, Schweighofer N, Stucchi N. Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling. Behav Brain Res 169: 75-82, 2006.
28. Pozzo T, Papaxanthis C, Stapley P, Berthoz A. The sensorimotor and cognitive integration of gravity. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 28: 92-101, 1998.
29. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8: 490-497, 2005.
30. Sober SJ, Sabes PN. Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23: 6982-6992, 2003.
31. Stanley J, Gowen E, Miall RC. Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 915-926, 2007.
32. Troje NF, Westhoff C. The inversion effect in biological motion perception: evidence for a "life detector"? Curr Biol 16: 821-824, 2006.
33. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12: 834-837, 2002.
34. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103: 460-470, 1995.
35. Zago M, Bosco G, Maffei V, Iosa M, Ivanenko YP, Lacquaniti F. Internal models of target motion: expected dynamics overrides measured kinematics in timing manual interceptions. J Neurophysiol 91: 1620-1634, 2004.
36. Zago M, McIntyre J, Senot P, Lacquaniti F. Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception. Exp Brain Res 192: 571-604, 2009.