Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 239-243

  Yamamoto, Seiichiro ^a,b   Fujita, Shin ^a   Akasu, Takayuki ^a   Inada, Ryo ^a   Moriya, Yoshihiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

anastomotic leakage; laparoscopic anterior resection; multifiring technique; obesity; risk factor

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SAFETY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862525045     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824fbb56     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic- assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718-1726.
2. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:413-424.
3. Laurent C, Leblanc F, Gineste C, et al. Laparoscopic approach in surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1555-1561.
4. Bianchi PP, Rosati R, Bona S, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:2047-2053.
5. Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:982-989.
6. Kim JS, Cho SY, Min BS, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:694-701.
7. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;2048:1021-1026.
8. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:902-908.
9. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211-216.
10. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, et al. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg. 2005;241:9-13.
11. Lee WS, Yun SH, Roh YN, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2008;32:1124-1129.
12. Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, et al. Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:265-270.
13. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, et al. Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:703-707.
14. Yamamoto S, Yoshimura K, Konishi F, et al. Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal carcinoM.A. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:497-500.
15. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (in Japanese). Sixth Edition. Tokyo: Kanehira-Syuppan; 1998.
16. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, et al. A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1447-1451.
17. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, et al. Safety of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection with double-stapling technique anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan TeC.H. 2005;15:70-74.
18. Schwandner O, Farke S, Schiedeck TH, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1452-1456.
19. Leroy J, Ananian P, Rubino F, et al. The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:69-76.
20. Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hügel O, et al. Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obes Surg. 2008;18:66-70.
21. Bège T, Lelong B, Francon D, et al. Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1460-1464.
22. Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher M.E. Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:947-951.
23. Tan PY, Stephens JH, Rieger NA, et al. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1708-1714.
24. Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, et al. Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1073 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:383-389.
25. Fukunaga M, Kidokoro A, Iba T, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection with a prolapsing technique for low rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2005;35:598-602.
26. Vithiananthan S, Cooper Z, Betten K, et al. Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:927-935.