Importance of histologic subtype in the staging of appendiceal tumors

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1379-1385

  Turaga, Kiran K ^a   Pappas, Sam G ^a   Gamblin, T Clark ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDIX TUMOR; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOID; COLON RESECTION; CURETTAGE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; EXCISION; FEMALE; HAZARD RATIO; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PREDICTION; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; ADULT; AGED; APPENDICEAL NEOPLASMS; CARCINOID TUMOR; CARCINOMA, SIGNET RING CELL; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862516826     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2238-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American JointCommittee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: ColorectalWorking Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739-57. (Pubitemid 30183160)
2. Jann H, Roll S, CouvelardA,HenticO, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of midgut and hindgut origin: tumor-node-metastasis classification determines clinical outcome. Cancer. 2011;117:3332-41.
3. Landry CS, Brock G, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC 2nd. Proposed staging system for colon carcinoid tumors based on an analysis of 2,459 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:874-81.
4. Rindi G, Klöppel G, Couvelard A, et al. TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2007;451:757-62. (Pubitemid 47497934)
5. Collins DC. 71,000 human appendix specimens. A final report, summarizing forty years' study. Am J Proctol. 1963;14:265-81.
6. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007;245:886-92. (Pubitemid 46809290)
7. McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results program, 1973-1998. Cancer. 2002;94:3307-12. (Pubitemid 34670516)
8. Sugarbaker PH. New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:69-76. (Pubitemid 43025395)
9. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. http://seer.cancer.gov/about/.
10. Koepsell T, Weiss N, editors. Epidemiological methods: studying the occurrence of illness. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
11. McGory ML, Maggard MA, Kang H, O'Connell JB, Ko CY. Malignancies of the appendix: beyond case series reports. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2264-71. (Pubitemid 43074447)
12. Esquivel J, Elias D, Baratti D, Kusamura S, Deraco M. Consensus statement on the loco regional treatment of colorectal cancer with peritoneal dissemination. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:263-7.
13. Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH, Young RH. The morphologic spectrum of ovarian metastases of appendiceal adenocarcinomas: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of tumors often misinterpreted as primary ovarian tumors or metastatic tumors from other gastrointestinal sites. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21:1144-55. (Pubitemid 27422313)
14. Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:415-23.