The diagnostic reliability of urinary cytology: A retrospective study

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 608-614

  Raisi, O ^a   Magnani, C ^a   Bigiani, N ^a   Cianciavicchia, E ^a   D'Amico, R ^b   Muscatello, U ^c   Ghirardini, C ^a  

^a Mirandola Hospital   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

collection fluids; thin layer technique; ThinPrep2000; ThinPrep3000; urine cytology

Indexed keywords

PRESERVATION SOLUTION;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; PRESERVATION AND STORAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; URETER CARCINOMA; URINE CYTOLOGY; UROGENITAL TRACT TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URETHRAL NEOPLASMS; URINALYSIS; URINE; URINE SPECIMEN COLLECTION;

EID: 84862512099     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21716     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shenoy UA, Colby TV, Schumann GB,. Reliability of urinary cytodiagnosis in urothelial neoplasms. Cancer 1985; 56: 2041-2045.
2. Bastacki S,. The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice. Cancer 1999; 87: 118-128.
3. Malik SN, Murphy WM,. Monitoring patients for bladder neoplasms: What can be expected of urinary cytology consultations in clinical practice. Urology 1999; 54: 62-66.
4. Gaston KE, Pruthi RS,. Value of urinary cytology in the diagnosis and management of urinary tract malignancies. Urology 2004; 63: 1009-1016.
5. Glatz K, Willi N, Glatz D, Barascud A, Grilli B, Herzog M, Dalquen P, Feichter G, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bubendorf L,. An international telecytologic quiz on urinary cytology reveals educational deficits and absence of a commonly used classification system. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 126: 294-301.
6. Zein TA, Milad MF,. Urine cytology in bladder tumors. Int Surg 1991; 76: 52-54.
7. Raistrick J, Shambayati B, Dunsmuir W,. Collection fluid helps preservation in voided urine cytology. Cytopathology 2008; 19: 111-117.
8. Voss JS, Kipp BR, Krueger AK, Clayton AC, Halling KC, Karnes RJ, Henry MR, Sebo TJ,. Changes in specimen preparation method may impact urine cytologic evaluation. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 428-433.
9. Wright RG, Halford JA,. Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology. Cytopathology 2001; 12: 306-313.
10. Elsheikh TM, Kirkpatrick JL, Wu HH,. Comparison of ThinPrep and Cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens. Cancer 2006; 108: 144-149.
11. Viswanath S, Zelhof B, Ho E, Sethia K, Mills R,. Is routinel urine cytology useful in the haematuria clinic? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90: 153-155.
12. Mansoor I,. Analysis of urine cytology at a community hospital. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2003; 15: 20-23.
13. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC,. Statistical methods for rates and proportion. Wiley; 1981. p 373-406.
14. Whisnant RE, Bastacky SI, Ohori NP,. Cytologic diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial neoplsms (low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 28: 186-190.
15. Reuter VE, Epstein JI, Amin MB, Mostofi FK,. The "WHO/ISUP Consensus Classification of Urothelial (Transitional Cell) Neoplasms": Continued discussion. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 879-880.
16. Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R,. Non invasive urothelial neoplasms: According to the most recent WHO classification. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 170-176.
17. Koss LG, Melamed MR, editors. Koss' diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p 777-808.
18. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, Parkin DM,. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence wordwide. IARC CancerBase no. 5, Version 1.0. Lyon: IARC Press; 2001. 120 p.
19. Zanetti R, Gafà L, Pannelli F, Conti E, Rosso S,. Il Cancro in Italia. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore; 2002.
20. Bibbo M, editor. Comprehensive cytopatology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1991. 1101 p.
21. Frable WJ, Paxon L, Barksdale JA, Koontz WW, Jr,. Current practice of urinary bladder cytology. Cancer Res 1977; 37: 2800-2805.
22. Cox ML, Schray CL, Luster CN, Stewart ZS, Korytko PJ, M Khan KN, Paulauskis JD, Dunstan RW,. Assessment of fixative, fixation, and tissue processing on morphology and RNA integrity. Exp Mol Pathol 2005; 80: 183-191.
23. Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, Chan SF, Macaskill P, Mannes P, Saville AM,. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: A systematic review. Lancet 2006; 367: 122-132.
24. Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, Meyer RG, Burkhardt HM, Halling AC, Cheville JC, Sebo TJ, Remakumar S, Stewart CS, Pankratz S, O'Kane DJ, Seeling SA, Lieber MM, Jenkins RB,. Comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2000; 164: 1768-1775.