Abnormal brain activation in Neurofibromatosis type 1: A link between visual processing and the default mode network

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Violante, Inês R ^a   Ribeiro, Maria J ^a   Cunha, Gil ^a   Bernardino, Inês ^a   Duarte, João V ^a   Ramos, Fabiana ^b   Saraiva, Jorge ^b   Silva, Eduardo ^b   Castelo Branco, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b CENTRO HOSPITALAR E UNIVERSITÁRIO DE COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN DYSFUNCTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN SIZE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFAULT MODE NETWORK; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAGNOCELLULAR; MALE; NEUROFIBROMATOSIS; PARVOCELLULAR; SCHOOL CHILD; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEUROFIBROMATOSIS 1; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862486864     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038785     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Kayl AE, Moore BD 3rd (2000) Behavioral phenotype of neurofibromatosis, type 1. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 6: 117-124.
2. Riccardi V, (1992) Neurofibromatosis: phenotype, natural history and pathogenesis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Friedman JM, Birch P, Greene C, (1993) National Neurofibromatosis Foundation International Database. Am J Med Genet 45: 88-91.
4. North K, (2000) Neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet 97: 119-127.
5. Levine TM, Materek A, Abel J, O'Donnell M, Cutting LE, (2006) Cognitive profile of neurofibromatosis type 1. Semin Pediatr Neurol 13: 8-20.
6. Hyman SL, Shores A, North KN, (2005) The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology 65: 1037-1044.
7. Rowbotham I, Pit-ten Cate IM, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Huijbregts SC, (2009) Cognitive control in adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropsychology 23: 50-60.
8. Billingsley RL, Jackson EF, Slopis JM, Swank PR, Mahankali S, et al. (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of phonologic processing in neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol 18: 731-740.
9. Clements-Stephens AM, Rimrodt SL, Gaur P, Cutting LE, (2008) Visuospatial processing in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropsychologia 46: 690-697.
10. Leventhal AG, (1991) Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol 4, The Neural basis of visual function, edited by A. G. Leventhal: Macmillan.
11. Livingstone M, Hubel D, (1988) Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 240: 740-749.
12. Hendry SH, Reid RC, (2000) The koniocellular pathway in primate vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 23: 127-153.
13. Ribeiro MJ, Violante IR, Bernardino I, Ramos F, Saraiva J, et al. (2012) Abnormal achromatic and chromatic contrast sensitivity in Neurofibromatosis type 1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53: 287-293.
14. Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement, (1988) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Archives of neurology 45: 575-578.
15. Wechsler D, (2003) Escala de Inteligência para Crianças- Terceira Edição (WISC-III): Manual. Lisboa: Cegoc-Tea.
16. Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH, (1993) Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists. xii,G60p. p.
17. Engel SA, Rumelhart DE, Wandell BA, Lee AT, Glover GH, et al. (1994) fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369: 525.
18. Sereno MI, Dale AM, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, et al. (1995) Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268: 889-893.
19. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 433-436.
20. Liu CS, Bryan RN, Miki A, Woo JH, Liu GT, et al. (2006) Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways have different blood oxygen level-dependent signal time courses in human primary visual cortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27: 1628-1634.
21. Payne JM, Moharir MD, Webster R, North KN, (2010) Brain structure and function in neurofibromatosis type 1: current concepts and future directions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81: 304-309.
22. Kriegeskorte N, Goebel R, (2001) An efficient algorithm for topologically correct segmentation of the cortical sheet in anatomical mr volumes. Neuroimage 14: 329-346.
23. Friston KJ, Josephs O, Rees G, Turner R, (1998) Nonlinear event-related responses in fMRI. Magn Reson Med 39: 41-52.
24. Shilyansky C, Karlsgodt KH, Cummings DM, Sidiropoulou K, Hardt M, et al. (2010) Neurofibromin regulates corticostriatal inhibitory networks during working memory performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13141-13146.
25. Talairach J, Tornoux P, (1988) Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain: 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme. 122 p. p.
26. Formisano E, Esposito F, Di Salle F, Goebel R, (2004) Cortex-based independent component analysis of fMRI time series. Magn Reson Imaging 22: 1493-1504.
27. Goebel R, Esposito F, Formisano E, (2006) Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 27: 392-401.
28. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM, (1999) High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 272-284.
29. Jo HJ, Lee JM, Kim JH, Shin YW, Kim IY, et al. (2007) Spatial accuracy of fMRI activation influenced by volume- and surface-based spatial smoothing techniques. Neuroimage 34: 550-564.
30. Penny W, Holmes A, Friston K, (2003) Random effects analysis. In: Frackowiak R FK, Frith C, Dolan R, Friston K, Price C, Zeki S, Ashburner J, Penny W, editors. editor. Human Brain Function. 2nd ed: Academic Press.
31. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, et al. (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 33: 636-647.
32. Liu T, Heeger DJ, Carrasco M, (2006) Neural correlates of the visual vertical meridian asymmetry. J Vis 6: 1294-1306.
33. Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Kujovic M, Palomero-Gallagher N, Zilles K, (2008) Organizational principles of human visual cortex revealed by receptor mapping. Cereb Cortex 18: 2637-2645.
34. Mendola JD, Conner IP, Sharma S, Bahekar A, Lemieux S, (2006) fMRI Measures of perceptual filling-in in the human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 363-375.
35. Bullier J, Hupe JM, James AC, Girard P, (2001) The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. Progress in brain research 134: 193-204.
36. Bullier J, (2001) Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36: 96-107.
37. Tranel D, Vianna E, Manzel K, Damasio H, Grabowski T, (2009) Neuroanatomical correlates of the Benton Facial Recognition Test and Judgment of Line Orientation Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31: 219-233.
38. Kesler SR, Haberecht MF, Menon V, Warsofsky IS, Dyer-Friedman J, et al. (2004) Functional neuroanatomy of spatial orientation processing in Turner syndrome. Cereb Cortex 14: 174-180.
39. Bucher K, Dietrich T, Marcar VL, Brem S, Halder P, et al. (2006) Maturation of luminance- and motion-defined form perception beyond adolescence: a combined ERP and fMRI study. Neuroimage 31: 1625-1636.
40. Klaver P, Lichtensteiger J, Bucher K, Dietrich T, Loenneker T, et al. (2008) Dorsal stream development in motion and structure-from-motion perception. Neuroimage 39: 1815-1823.
41. Loenneker T, Klaver P, Bucher K, Lichtensteiger J, Imfeld A,et al. Microstructural development: organizational differences of the fiber architecture between children and adults in dorsal and ventral visual streams. Hum Brain Mapp 32: 935-946.
42. McKiernan KA, Kaufman JN, Kucera-Thompson J, Binder JR, (2003) A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 394-408.
43. Mason MF, Norton MI, Van Horn JD, Wegner DM, Grafton ST, et al. (2007) Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science 315: 393-395.
44. Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME, (2001) Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4259-4264.
45. Shulman GL, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Fiez JA, et al. (1997) Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 7: 193-206.
46. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, et al. (2001) A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 676-682.
47. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V, (2003) Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 253-258.
48. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, et al. (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 9673-9678.
49. Laycock R, Crewther SG, Crewther DP, (2007) A role for the 'magnocellular advantage' in visual impairments in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31: 363-376.
50. Laycock R, Crewther DP, Crewther SG, (2008) The advantage in being magnocellular: a few more remarks on attention and the magnocellular system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32: 1409-1415.
51. Huijbregts S, Swaab H, de Sonneville L, (2010) Cognitive and motor control in neurofibromatosis type I: influence of maturation and hyperactivity-inattention. Dev Neuropsychol 35: 737-751.
52. Martinez A, Hillyard SA, Dias EC, Hagler DJ Jr, Butler PD, et al. (2008) Magnocellular pathway impairment in schizophrenia: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 28: 7492-7500.
53. Coleman MJ, Cestnick L, Krastoshevsky O, Krause V, Huang Z, et al. (2009) Schizophrenia patients show deficits in shifts of attention to different levels of global-local stimuli: evidence for magnocellular dysfunction. Schizophr Bull 35: 1108-1116.
54. Sutherland A, Crewther DP, (2010) Magnocellular visual evoked potential delay with high autism spectrum quotient yields a neural mechanism for altered perception. Brain 133: 2089-2097.
55. Pellicano E, Gibson L, Maybery M, Durkin K, Badcock DR, (2005) Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: a possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence? Neuropsychologia 43: 1044-1053.
56. Kogan CS, Boutet I, Cornish K, Zangenehpour S, Mullen KT, et al. (2004) Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome. Brain 127: 591-601.
57. Kennedy DP, Redcay E, Courchesne E, (2006) Failing to deactivate: resting functional abnormalities in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 8275-8280.
58. Menon V, Leroux J, White CD, Reiss AL, (2004) Frontostriatal deficits in fragile X syndrome: relation to FMR1 gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 3615-3620.
59. Pomarol-Clotet E, Salvador R, Sarro S, Gomar J, Vila F, et al. (2008) Failure to deactivate in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: dysfunction of the default mode network? Psychol Med 38: 1185-1193.
60. Salgado-Pineda P, Fakra E, Delaveau P, McKenna PJ, Pomarol-Clotet E,et al. Correlated structural and functional brain abnormalities in the default mode network in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res 125: 101-109.