A Mixed Methods Approach: Using Cultural Modeling and Consensus Analysis to Better Understand New Zealand's International Innovation Performance

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 166-183

  Rinne, Tiffany ^a   Fairweather, John ^a  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

consensus analysis; cultural modeling; innovation; mixed methods research; New Zealand

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862339557     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689811420572     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson R. C.Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Anderson R. C.Spiro R. J.Montague W. E., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1977:415-431.
2. Andrew J. P.,DeRocco E. S.,Taylor A.The innovation imperative in manufacturing: How the United States can restore its edge. Boston, MA: Boston Consulting Group; 2009:.
3. Arnon S.,Reichel N.Closed and open-ended question tools in a telephone survey about "The good teacher": An example of a mixed method study.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2009;3 (2): 172-196.
4. Blount B. G.Keywords, cultural models, and representations of knowledge: A case study from the Georgia coast. Athens: University of Georgia, Department of Anthropology; 2002:.
5. BorgattiS. P. (1997). Consensus analysis. Retrieved from http://www.analytictech.com/borgatti/consensu.htm.
6. Brannen J.Mixed methods research: A discussion paper. London, England: Economic & Social Research Council National Centre for Research Methods; 2005:.
7. Bryman A.Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?.Qualitative Research. 2006;6:97-113.
8. Burke Johnson R.,Onwuegbuzie J.,Turner L. A.Toward a definition of mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2007;1 (2): 112-133.
9. Colby B.Encyclopedia of cultural anthropology. Levinson D.Ember M., ed. New York, NY: Henry Holt; 1996:209-214.
10. Cooley D. R.Cultural models and fishing knowledge: A case study of commercial blue crab fisherman in Georgia, USA. Athens: University of Georgia; 2003:.
11. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:.
12. Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.,Gutman M. L.,Handson W. E.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003:209-241.
13. D'Andrade R.Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion. Schweder R. A.Levine R. A., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1984:88-119.
14. de Munck V. C.,Dudley N.,Cardinale J.Cultural models of gender in Sri Lanka and the United States.Ethnology. 2002;41:225-261.
15. Dressler W. W.,Balieiro M. C.,Dos Santos J. E.Culture, socioeconomic status, and physical and mental health in Brazil.Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1998;12:424-446.
16. Fairweather J.,Rinne T.Computer-assisted, self interviewing (CASI) compared to face-to-face interviewing (FTFI) with open-ended, non-sensitive questions. 2011, under review;:.
17. Fukuyama F.Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton; 1995:.
18. Garro L. C.Intracultural variation in folk medical knowlegde: A comparison between curers and non-curers.American Anthropologist. 1986;88:351-370.
19. Garro L. C.Explaining high blood pressure: Variation in knowledge about illness.American Ethnologist. 1988;15:98-119.
20. Garro L. C.Intracultural variation in causal accounts of diabetes: A comparison of three Canadian Anishinaabe (Ojibway) communities.Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. 1996;20:381-420.
21. Garro L. C.Remembering what one knows and the construction of the past: A comparison of cultural consensus theory and cultural schema theory.Ethos. 2000;28:275-319.
22. Garro L. C.Explaining high blood pressure: Variation in knowledge about illness.American Ethnologist. 1988;15 (1): 98-119.
23. Goodenough W. H.Cultural anthropology and linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University; 1957:.
24. Goodenough W. H.Comments on cultural evolution.Daedalus. 1961;90:521-528.
25. Greene J. C.,Caracelli V. J.,Graham W. F.Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1989;11:255-274.
26. Gregory D.Dictionary of human geography. 2000). Discourse. In JohnstonR. J.GregoryD.PrattG.WattsM. (Eds.), Dictionary of human geography (4th ed., pp. 180-181). Oxford, England: Blackwell.Johnston R. J.Gregory D.Pratt G.Watts M., ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2000:180-181.
27. Hanson W. E.,Creswell J. W.,Plano Clark V. L.,Petska V. L.,Creswell J. D.Mixed methods reseach designs in counseling psychology.Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2005;52:224-235.
28. Holland D.,Cole M.Between discourse and schema: Reformulating a cultural-historical approach to culture and mind.Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 1995;26:475-490.
29. Holland D.,Quinn N.Cultural models of language and thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
30. Keesing R. M.Paradigms lost: The new ethnography and the new linguistics.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 1972;28:299-331.
31. Lewis O.Life in a Mexican village: Tepoztlan restudied. Springfield: University of Illinois Press; 1951:.
32. Nakata C.,Sivakumar K.National culture and new product development: An integrative review.Journal of Marketing. 1996;60 (1): 61-72.
33. Governance of innovation systems. Paris, France: Author; 2005:.
34. Piaget J.The language and thought of the child. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1926:.
35. Pro Inno Europe. (2009, January). European innovation scoreboard 2008: Comparative analysis of innovation performance. Maastricht, Netherlands: Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). Retrieved from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/page/european-innovation-scoreboard-2008.
36. Redfield R.Tepoztlan, a Mexican village: A study of folk life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1930:.
37. Romney A. K.,Batchelder W. H.,Weller S. C.Recent applicaations of cultural consensus theory.American Behavioral Scientist. 1987;31:163-177.
38. Romney A. K.,Weller S. C.,Batchelder W. H.Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy.American Anthropologist. 1986;88:313-338.
39. Rusciano F. L.The construction of national identity: A 23 nation study.Political Research Quarterly. 2003;56:361-366.
40. Sandelowski M.Triangles and crystals: On the geometry of qualitative research.Research in Nursing & Health. 1995;18:569-574.
41. Shane S.Why do some societies invent more than others?.Journal of Business Venturing. 1992;7:29-46.
42. Shane S.Cultural influences on national rates of innovation.Journal of Business Venturing. 1993;8:59-73.
43. Statistics New Zealand. (n.d.). Quickstats about culture and identity. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2006CensusHomePage/QuickStats/quickstats-about-a-subject/culture-and-identity/european.aspx.
44. Strauss C.,Quinn N.A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1997:.
45. Swora M. G.Using cultural consensus analysis to study sexual risk perception: A report on a pilot study.Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2003;5:339-352.
46. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:.
47. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003a:.
48. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral sciences. Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003b:671-703.
49. Vogt W. P.Reliability dictionary of statistics and methodology: A non-technical guide to the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993:.
50. Webb E. J.,Campbell D. T.,Schwartz R. D.,Sechrest L.Unobtrusive measures. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1966:.
51. Weller S. C.,Romney A. K.Qualitative research methods: Vol. 10. Systematic data collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:.
52. Williams M.Interpretivism and generalisation.Sociology. 2000;34:209-224.
53. Wind J.,Mahajan V.,Bayless J. L.The role of new product models in supporting and improving the new product development process: Some preliminary results. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute; 1990:.
54. Woolfolk A. E.Educational psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1987:.