Towards probabilistic argumentation

Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 443-462

  Zukerman, Ingrid ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862332651     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_22     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. J. R. Anderson. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1983.
2. E. Charniak and R. Goldman. A Bayesian model of plan recognition. Artificial Intelligence, 64(1):53-79, 1993.
3. J. Chu-Carroll and S. Carberry. Response generation in collaborative negotiation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 136-143, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995.
4. J. Chu-Carroll and S. Carberry. Conflict resolution in collaborative planning dialogues. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 6(56):969-1015, 2000. (Pubitemid 32087758)
5. T. Dean and M. Boddy. An analysis of time-dependent planning. In AAAI88-Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 49-54, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1988.
6. J. Evans. Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1989.
7. S. George, I. Zukerman, and M. Niemann. Modeling suppositions in users' arguments. In UM05-Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 19-29, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005.
8. S. George, I. Zukerman, andM. Niemann. Inferences, suppositions and explanatory extensions in argument interpretation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 17(5):439-474, 2007. (Pubitemid 350178305)
9. A. Gertner, C. Conati, and K. VanLehn. Procedural help in Andes: Generating hints using a Bayesian network student model. In AAAI98-Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 106-111, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
10. N. Green and S. Carberry. A hybrid reasoning model for indirect answers. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 58-65, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1994.
11. J. R. Hobbs, M. E. Stickel, D. E. Appelt, and P. Martin. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2):69-142, 1993.
12. H. Horacek. How to avoid explaining obvious things (without omitting central information). In ECAI94-Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 520-524, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.
13. E. Horvitz and T. Paek. A computational architecture for conversation. In UM99-Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 201-210, Banff, Canada, 1999.
14. E. Horvitz, H. Suermondt, and G. Cooper. Bounded conditioning: flexible inference for decision under scarce resources. In UAI89-Proceedings of the 1989 Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 182-193, Windsor, Canada, 1989.
15. X. Huang and A. Fiedler. Proof verbalization as an application of NLG. In IJCAI97-Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 965-970, Nagoya, Japan, 1997.
16. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
17. K. Korb and A. Nicholson. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004.
18. K. B. Korb, R. McConachy, and I. Zukerman. A cognitive model of argumentation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 400-405, Stanford, California, 1997.
19. R. McConachy, K. B. Korb, and I. Zukerman. Deciding what not to say: An attentional-probabilistic approach to argument presentation. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 669-674, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
20. R. McConachy and I. Zukerman. Towards a dialogue capability in a Bayesian argumentation system. ETAI 3-Electronic Transactions of Artificial Intelligence (Section D), pages 89-124, 1999.
21. S. Mehl. Forward inferences in text generation. In ECAI94-Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 525-529, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994.
22. H. Ng and R. Mooney. On the role of coherence in abductive explanation. In AAAI90-Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 337-342, Boston, Massachusetts, 1990.
23. S. H. Nielsen and S. Parsons. An application of formal argumentation: Fusing Bayesian networks in multi-agent systems. Artificial Intelligence, 171:754-775, 2007. (Pubitemid 47285075)
24. R. Nisbett, E. Borgida, R. Crandall, and H. Reed. Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. In J. Carroll and J. Payne, editors, Cognition and social behavior, pages 113-133. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA, 1976.
25. N. Oren, T. Norman, and A. Preece. Subjective logic and arguing with evidence. Artificial Intelligence, 171:838-854, 2007. (Pubitemid 47285074)
26. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California, 1988.
27. A. Quilici. Detecting and responding to plan-oriented misconceptions. In A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster, editors, User Models in Dialog Systems, pages 108-132. Springer-Verlag, 1989.
28. C. Reed and D. Long. Content ordering in the generation of persuasive discourse. In IJCAI97-Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1022-1027, Nagoya, Japan, 1997.
29. G. Rowe and C. Reed. Argument diagramming: The Araucaria project. In A. Okada, S. Buckingham Shum, and A. Sherborne, editors, Knowledge Cartography, pages 163-181. Springer, 2008.
30. R. H. Thomason, J. R. Hobbs, and J. D. Moore. Communicative goals. In Proceedings of ECAI96 Workshop-Gaps and Bridges: New Directions in Planning and NLG, pages 7-12, Budapest, Hungary, 1996.
31. T. van Gelder. Teaching critical thinking: some lessons from cognitive science. College Teaching, 45(1):1-6, 2005.
32. G. Vreeswijk. IACAS: An interactive argumentation system. Technical Report CS 94-03, Department of Computer Science, University of Limburg, 1994.
33. C.Wallace. Statistical and Inductive Inference byMinimum Message Length. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
34. I. Zukerman. An integrated approach for generating arguments and rebuttals and understanding rejoinders. In UM01-Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 84-94, Sonthofen, Germany, 2001. (Pubitemid 33304887)
35. I. Zukerman. Discourse interpretation as model selection-a probabilistic approach. In B. Bouchon-Meunier, C. Marsala, M. Rifqi, and R. Yager, editors, Uncertainty and Intelligent Information Systems, pages 61-73. World Scientific, 2008.
36. I. Zukerman and S. George. A probabilistic approach for argument interpretation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, Special Issue on Language-Based Interaction, 15(1-2):5-53, 2005. (Pubitemid 40914447)
37. I. Zukerman, S. George, and M. George. Incorporating a user model into an information theoretic framework for argument interpretation. In UM03-Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 106-116, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, 2003. (Pubitemid 36768554)
38. I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, and K. B. Korb. Bayesian reasoning in an abductive mechanism for argument generation and analysis. In AAAI98-Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 833-838, Madison, Wisconsin, 1998.
39. I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, and K. B. Korb. Using argumentation strategies in automated argument generation. In INLG'2000-Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 55-62, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000.
40. I. Zukerman, R. McConachy, K. B. Korb, and D. A. Pickett. Exploratory interaction with a Bayesian argumentation system. In IJCAI99-Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1294-1299, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.