Interrater reliability and convergent validity of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine methodology for conducting systematic reviews

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

Volumn 54, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 606-611

  Wiart, Lesley ^a,b   Kolaski, Kat ^c   Butler, Charlene ^d   Vogtle, Laura ^e   Logan, Lynne Romeiser ^f   Hickman, Robbin ^g   Romeiser, Jamie ^h   Samson Fang, Lisa ⁱ   Matsuba, Carey A ^j   Baird, Micah W ^k   Roxborough, Lori ^l   Mayson, Tanja ^l   Dinu, Irina ^b  

^a GLENROSE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Seattle Public Schools ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^f State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^h STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^k AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^l BC CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE METHODOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); VALIDITY;

CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; INFANT; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84862326641     PISSN: 00121622     EISSN: 14698749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04307.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 376-80.
2. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Glossary. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. (accessed 10 January 2011).
3. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. JAMA 2000; 13: 1290-6.
4. Dickersin K. Health-care policy. To reform U.S. health care, start with systematic reviews. Science 2010; 329: 516-7.
5. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Summary), No. 47. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002; pp. 1-11.
6. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Serv Res 2004; 4: 38.
7. Butler C, Chambers H, Goldstein M, et al. Evaluating research in developmental disabilities: a conceptual framework for reviewing treatment outcomes. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 55-9.
8. Logan LR, Hickman RR, Harris SR, Heriza CB. Single-subject research design: recommendations for levels of evidence and quality rating. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 99-103.
9. Darrah J, Hickman R, O'Donnell ME, Vogtle L, Wiart L. AACPDM methodology to develop systematic reviews of treatment Interventions (revision 1.2). (updated December 2008) AACPDM Treatment Outcomes Committee. (accessed 10 February 2011).
10. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
11. Sackett DL, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence Based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
12. Zaza S, Wright-De Aguìero LK, Briss PA, et al. Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventative services. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18: 44-74.
13. Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 1-20.
14. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomized intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1-173.
15. Morgan GA, Gliner JA, Harmon RJ. Measurement validity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40: 729-31.
16. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004; 1: 176-84.
17. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-8.
18. Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2008; 61: 29-48.
19. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 423-9.
20. Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 257-68.
21. Hoehler FK. Bias and prevalence effects on kappa viewed in terms of sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 499-503.
22. Landis KR, Koch LC. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
23. Moja LP, Telaro E, D'Amico R, Moschetti I, Coe L, Liberati A. Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. BMJ 2005; 330: 1053.