Feasibility of neurobehavioral screening following diagnosis of pediatric cancer

Pediatric Blood and Cancer

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 295-300

  Pejnovic, Laura P ^a   De Luca, Cinzia R ^b,c   Gentle, Ellen ^b,c   Anson, Katie ^b   Ashley, David M ^b,d   Anderson, Vicki A ^a,b,c   Mccarthy, Maria C ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c MURDOCH CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feasibility; Neurocognitive; Pediatric oncology; Screening

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOLOGY; CHILD; CHILDHOOD CANCER; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; FAMILY; FAMILY COPING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NEWBORN; OPTOMETRY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; NEOPLASMS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 84862262569     PISSN: 15455009     EISSN: 15455017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24056     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe and the United States. Cancer 2002; 95: 1767-1772.
2. Castellino S, Hudson MM. Health issues in survivors of childhood cancer. Med J 2002; 95: 977-984.
3. Oeffinger KC, Nathan PC, Kremer LCM. Challenges after curative treatment for childhood cancer and long-term follow up of survivors. Hematol Oncol Clin N 2010; 24: 129-149.
4. Bhatia S. Late effects among survivors of leukemia during childhood and adolescence. Blood Cell Mol Dis 2003; 31: 84-92.
5. Nathan PC. Guidelines for identification of, advocacy for, and intervention in neurocognitive problems in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Arch Pediat Adol Med 2007; 161: 798-806.
6. Butler RW. Neurocognitive interventions for children and adolescents surviving cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 2005; 30: 65-78.
7. Gerhardt CA, Dixon M, Miller K, et al. Educational and occupational outcomes among survivors of childhood cancer during the transition to emerging adulthood. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2007; 28: 448-455.
8. Bhatia S, Constine LS. Late morbidity after successful treatment of children with cancer. Cancer J 2009; 15: 174-180.
9. Krull KR, Okcu F, Potter B, et al. Screening for neurocognitive impairment in pediatric cancer long-term survivors. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4138-4143.
10. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Glover G. The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Soc Psych Psych Epid 1999; 34: 243-249.
11. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III). Harcourt Assessment; 1997.
12. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Harcourt Assessment; 2003.
13. Wechsler D. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Third Edition (WPPSI-III). Harcourt Assessment; 2004.
14. Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. Nepsy. PsychCorp; 1998.
15. Korkman M, Kirk U, Kemp S. Nepsy-II. PsychCorp; 2007.
16. Cohen MJ. Children's Memory Scale. The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
17. Manly T, Robertson IH, Anderson V, et al. Test of everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch). Suffolk, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1999.
18. Robertson IH, Ward T, Ridgeway V, et al. Test of everyday attention (TEA). Suffolk, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1994.
19. Beery K, Buktenica N, Beery N. Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration-Revised 5th Edition (VMI). Pearson Assessments; 2004.
20. Partington J, Leiter R. Partington's pathway test. Psychol Serv Center Bull 1949; 1: 9-20.
21. Tombaugh TN. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: Fas and animal naming. Arch Clin Neuropsych 1999; 14: 167-177.
22. Wechsler D. Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Second Edition (WIAT-II) abbreviated. The Psychological Corporation; 2001.
23. Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW. Behavior Assessment System for Children-Second Edition (BASC-2). AGS Publishing; 2004.
24. Glascoe FP. Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status: How well do parents' concerns identify children with behavioral and emotional problems? Clin Pediatr 2003; 42: 133-138.
25. Glascoe FP. PEDS Brief Administration and Scoring Guide. Ellsworth & Vandermeer Press Ltd; 2005.
26. Gioia G, Isquith P, Guy S, et al. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2000.
27. Gioia G, Espy K, Isquith P. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2002.
28. McCarthy MC, Clarke NE, Vance A, et al. Measuring psychosocial risk in families caring for a child with cancer: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009; 53: 78-83.
29. Pai ALH, Patino-Fernandez AM, McSherry M, et al. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): Psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 33: 50-62.
30. Sparrow S, Cicchetti D, Balla D. Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales. AGS Publishing; 2005.
31. Butler R, Copeland D. Attentional processes and their remediation in children treated for cancer: A literature review and the development of a therapeutic approach. J Int Neuropsych Soc 2002; 8: 113-124.