The common fate model for dyadic data: Variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model

Journal of Family Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 140-148

  Ledermann, Thomas ^a   Kenny, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

APIM; Common fate; Dyadic data; MSEM; SEM

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SPOUSE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SPOUSES;

EID: 84862254298     PISSN: 08933200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026624     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1995-2009). Amos 18 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
2. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-14. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
3. Burk, W. J., & Laursen, B. (2010). Mother and adolescent reports of associations between child behavior problems and mother-child relationship qualities: Separating shared variance from individual variance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: An Official Publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 38, 657-667. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-9396-z
4. Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Kashy, D. A., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 447-462. doi:10.1177/0146167201274006
5. Conger, R. D., Rueter, M. A., & Elder, G. H. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54-71. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.54
6. Cook, W. L. (1998). Integrating models of interdependence with treatment evaluation in marital therapy research. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 529-542. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.12.4.529
7. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Examining the validity of self-report assessments of family functioning: A question of the level of analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 209-216. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.209
8. Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583-619. doi:10.1146/annurev .psych.093008.100356
9. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1997). On the statistics of interdependence: Treating dyadic data with respect. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 271-302). New York, NY: Wiley.
10. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (1999). The correlational analysis of dyadiclevel data in the distinguishable case. Personal Relationships, 6, 449-469. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00203.x
11. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2001). A statistical framework for modeling homogeneity and interdependence in groups. In M. Clark & G. Fletcher (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Interpersonal processes (pp. 505-534). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. W. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901-924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05027
13. Griffin, D. W., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-445. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.430
14. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294. doi: 10.1177/0265407596132007
15. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.x
16. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339
18. Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 359-366. doi:10.1037/a0019651
19. Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Bibliography of actor-partner interdependence model. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/doc/apimbiblio.pdf
20. Ledermann, T., & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Moderatorund Mediatoreffekte bei dyadischen Daten: Zwei Erweiterungen des Akteur-PartnerInterdependenz-Modells [Moderator and mediator effects in dyadic research: Two extensions of the actor-partner interdependence model]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 27-40. doi:10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.27
21. Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Rudaz, M., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Stress, communication, and marital quality in couples. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 59, 195-206. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00595.x
22. Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661-670. doi:10.1037/a0016197
23. Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 595-612. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2011.607099
24. Lee, S., & Hershberger, S. (1990). A simple rule for generating equivalent models in covariance structure modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 313-334. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2503_4
25. Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203-229. doi:10.1037/a0012869
26. Macho, S., & Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods. doi:10.1037/a0021763
27. Matthews, L. S., Conger, R. D., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (1996). Workfamily conflict and marital quality: Mediating processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 62-79. doi:10.2307/2787119
28. Muthén, B. O., & Asparouhov, T. (2008). Growth mixture modeling: Analysis with non-Gaussian random effects. In G. Fitzmaurice, M. Davidian, G. Verbeke & G. Molenberghs (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis (pp. 143-165). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
29. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
30. Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11, 127-141. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127
31. Rhemtulla, M., Schoemann, A. M., & Preacher, K. J. (2011). A multilevel SEM approach to examine dyadic correlations. Paper presented at the Modern Modeling Methods (M3) Conference, Storrs, CT.
32. Schneider, B., & Waite, L. J. (2008). The 500 family study: 1998-2000: United States. [Data file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
33. Stelzl, I. (1986). Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit: Some rules for generating equivalent path models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 309-331. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2103_3
34. Teachman, J. D., Carver, K., & Day, R. (1995). A model for the analysis of paired data. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 57, 1011-1024. doi:10.2307/353419
35. Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (2005). Structural equation models for interchangeable dyads: Being the same makes a difference. Psychological Methods, 10, 139-158. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.139
36. Ximénez, C. (2006). A Monte Carlo study of recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 587-614. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1304_5