Is Anything Sacred Anymore?

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 155-161

  Ditto, Peter H ^a   Liu, Brittany ^a   Wojcik, Sean P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862237165     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.669248     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alicke, M. 2000. Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126: 556-574.
2. Aristotle, M. 1998. The Nicomachean ethics, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. D. Ross, Trans
3. Atran, S., Axelrod, R. and Davis, R. 2007. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317: 1039-1040.
4. Baron, J. and Spranca, M. 1997. Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70: 1-16.
5. Bartels, D. M. and Medin, D. L. 2007. Are morally-motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices?. Psychological Science, 18: 24-28.
6. Benen, S. 2011, August 12. Ten-to-one isn't good enough for the GOP. Washington Monthly, Retrieved fromhttp://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
7. Bentham, J. 1961. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (Original work published 1789).
8. Cushman, F. 2008. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108: 353-380.
9. Cushman, F., Knobe, J. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. Moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments. Cognition, 108: 353-380.
10. Cushman, F. A. and Young, L. 2009. The psychology of dilemmas and the philosophy of morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12: 9-24.
11. Davis, B. 1978. The moralistic fallacy. Nature, 272: 390
12. Ditto, P. H. and Liu, B. 2011. "Deontological dissonance and the consequentialist crutch". In The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil, Edited by: Shaver, P. and Mikulincer, M. 51-70. New York, NY: APA Books.
13. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D. and Shikaki, K. 2007. Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104: 7357-7360.
15. Gino, F., Shu, L. L. and Bazerman, M. H. 2010. Nameless + Harmless = Blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111: 102-115.
16. Gray, H. M., Gray, K. and Wegner, D. M. 2007. Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315: 619
17. Gray, K. and Wegner, D. M. 2008. The sting of intentional pain. Psychological Science, 19: 1260-1262.
18. Gray, K. and Wegner, D. M. 2009. Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96: 505-520.
19. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. and Cohen, J. D. 2001. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 14: 2105-2108.
20. Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814-834.
21. Haidt, J. and Graham, J. 2007. When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20: 98-116.
22. Haidt, J., Koller, S. and Dias, M. 1993. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 613-628.
23. Henrich, J., Heine, S. and Norenzayan, A. 2010. The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 61-83.
24. Hume, D. 1985. A treatise of human nature, London: Penguin: Original work published 1740.
25. Kant, I. 1998. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, Edited by: Gregor, M. J. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785).
26. Knobe, J. 2010. Person as scientist, person as moralist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33: 315-365.
27. Liu, B. and Ditto, P. H. 2012. What dilemma? Moral intuitions shape factual belief, Manuscript under review.
28. Malle, B. F. 2006. Intentionality, morality, and their relationship in human judgment. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6: 87-112.
29. Morewedge, C. K. 2009. Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138: 535-545.
30. Pettit, D. and Knobe, J. 2009. The pervasive impact of moral judgment. Mind and Language, 24: 586-604.
31. Rai, T. S. and Fiske, A. P. 2011. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118: 57-75.
32. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J. and Miller, L. C. 1997. Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1: 26-53.
33. Rozin, P., Millman, L. and Nemeroff, C. 1986. Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 703-712.
34. Shaver, K. G. 1985. The attribution of blame, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
35. Simon, D., Krawezyk, D. C. and Holyoak, K. J. 2004. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15: 331-336.
36. Singer, P. 1972. Is act-utilitarianism self-defeating?. Philosophical Review, 81: 94-104.
37. Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and against, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Steinhauer, J. 2012, February 8. Birth control is covered, and G.O.P. vows a fight. The New York Times, Retrieved fromhttp://www.nytimes.com/
39. Tetlock, P. E. 2003. Thinking about the unthinkable: Coping with secular encroachments on sacred values. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7: 320-324.
40. Thagard, P. 2004. Coherence in thought and action., Boston, MA: MIT Press.
41. Walster, E. 1966. Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3: 73-79.
42. Weiner, B. 1995. Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct, New York, NY: Guilford.
43. Young, L. and Phillips, J. 2011. The paradox of moral focus. Cognition, 119: 166-178.