How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others' generous acts

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 795-803

  Inesi, M Ena ^a   Gruenfeld, Deborah H ^b,d   Galinsky, Adam D ^c,e  

^a LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attribution; Corrupt; Favor; Instrumental; Power; Relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862225196     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ames D.R., Flynn F.J., Weber E.U. It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:461-474.
2. Baldwin M.W., Holmes J.G. Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:1087-1098.
3. Berscheid E., Reis H.T. Attraction and close relationships. The handbook of social psychology 1998, 193-281. McGraw-Hill, New York. 4 ed. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (Eds.).
4. Blood R.O., Wolfe D.M. Husbands and wives 1960, Macmillan, New York.
5. Burgoyne C. Introduction: Special issue on the household economy. Journal of Socio-Economics 2008, 37:455-457.
6. Cavanagh, K. (2010). Leonardo DiCaprio says he 'had better success meeting girls' before hitting it big with 'Titanic', NYDailyNews.com. Retrieved on August 27, 2010.
7. Cialdini R.B. Influence 1984, William Morrow and Company, New York.
8. Cohn D., Fry R. Women, men and the new economics of marriage 2010, Pew Research Center Publications. http://pewsocialtrends.org.
9. Davis M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 44:113-126.
10. Ebenbach D.H., Keltner D. Power, emotion and judgmental accuracy in social conflict: Motivating the cognitive miser. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1998, 20:7-21.
11. Eisenberger R., Huntington R., Hutchison S., Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1986, 71:500-507.
12. Emerson R.M. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review 1962, 27:31-40.
13. Fiske S.T. Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. The American Psychologist 1993, 48:621-628.
14. Fiske S.T. Social beings: Core motives in social psychology 2010, Wiley, New York.
15. Fitzsimons G.M., Bargh J.A. Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:148-164.
16. Galinsky A.D., Magee J.C., Inesi M.E., Gruenfeld D.H. Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science 2006, 17:1068-1074.
17. Goodwin S.A., Gubin A., Fiske S.T., Yzerbyt V.Y. Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2000, 3:227-256.
18. Gouldner A.W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 1960, 25:161-178.
19. Greenberg M.S., Frisch D.M. Effect of intentionality on willingness to reciprocate a favor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1973, 8:99-111.
20. Gruenfeld D.H., Inesi M.E., Magee J.C., Galinsky A.D. Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:111-127.
21. Guinote A. Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:237-252.
22. Jalovaara M. The joint effects of marriage partners' socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demograph 2003, 40:67-81.
23. Johnson D.W., Johnson F.P. Joining together: Group theory and group skills 2009, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
24. Kelley H.H. Causal schemata and the attribution process. Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior 1972, General Learning Press, Morristown, N. J. E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, B. Weiner (Eds.).
25. Keltner D.J., Gruenfeld D.H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review 2003, 110:265-284.
26. Kipnis D. Does power corrupt?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972, 24:33-41.
27. Kipnis D., Castell P.J., Gergen M., Mauch D. Metamorphic effects of power. The Journal of Applied Psychology 1976, 61:127-135.
28. Kramer R.M. The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion 1994, 18:199-230.
29. Kraus M.W., CÔté S., Keltner D. Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1716-1723.
30. Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (in press). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science.
31. Larzelere R.E., Huston T.L. The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 1980, 42:595-604.
32. Lee K. Gary Coleman leaves bittersweet instructions for funeral 2010, People.com, Retrieved on August 27, 2010.
33. Lee F., Tiedens L.Z. Is it lonely at the top? The independence and interdependence of power holders. Research in Organizational Behavior 2001, 23:43-91.
34. Malhotra D., Murnighan J.K. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly 2002, 47:534-559.
35. McClelland G.H. Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. H.T. Reis, C.M. Judd (Eds.).
36. McCrae R., Costa P. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:81-90.
37. Morgenthau H.J. Love and power. Commentary 1962, 33:247-251.
38. Overbeck J.R., Park B. When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:549-565.
39. Pahl J. The allocation of money and the structuring of inequality within marriage. Sociological Review 1983, 237-262. May.
40. Piff P.K., Kraus M.W., CÔté S., Cheng B.H., Keltner D. Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2010, 99:771-784.
41. Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007, 42:185-227.
42. Reis H.T., Shaver P. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Handbook of personal relations 1988, Wiley, Chichester, England. S.W. Duck (Ed.).
43. Rempel J.K., Holmes J.G., Zanna M.P. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 49:95-112.
44. Rios, K., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Fast, N. (2011). Discomfort with power: When psychological distance meets the need to belong. Unpublished manuscript.
45. Rogers S.J. Dollars, dependency, and divorce: Four perspectives on the role of wives' income. Journal of Marriage and Family 2004, 66:59-74.
46. Rusbult C.E., Martz J.M., Agnew C.R. The Investment Scale Model: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships 1998, 5:357-391.
47. Schopler J., Thompson V.D. Role of attribution processes in mediating amount of reciprocity for a favor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968, 10:243-250.
48. Simmel G. The sociology of Georg Simmel (K. H. Wolff, Trans.) 1950, Free Press, New York.
49. Smith P.K., Trope Y. You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:578-596.
50. Snodgrass S.S. Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 49:145-155.
51. Snodgrass S.S. Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 62:154-158.
52. Van Kleef G.A., Oveis C., Van der Löwe I., LuoKogan A., Goetz J., Keltner D. Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1315-1322.
53. Vogler C., Lyonette C., Wiggins R.D. Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships. The Sociological Review 2008, 56:117-143.
54. Vonk R. Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:515-526.
55. Wheeler S.C., DeMarree K.G., Petty R.E. Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active-self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2007, 11:234-261.
56. White L., Rogers S.J. Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family 2000, 62(1035-1051).
57. Wieselquist J., Rusbult C.E., Foster C.A., Agnew C.R. Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:942-966.