Group decision making methods of the incomplete IFPRs and IPRs

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 542-552

  Gong, Zaiwu ^a   Guo, Chonglan ^a   He, Yuanyuan ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Group decision making; Least squares model; Preference relation; Priority

Indexed keywords

COMPLETE INFORMATION; FUZZY PREFERENCE RELATIONS; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY; LEAST SQUARE; LEAST SQUARES METHODS; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; OPTIMAL MODEL; PREFERENCE RELATION; PRIORITY; PRIORITY METHOD; PRIORITY VECTOR;

DECISION MAKING; FUZZY SETS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

EID: 84862190271     PISSN: 18756891     EISSN: 18756883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2012.696919     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process, New York: McGraw- Hill.
2. Wang, L.F. and Xu, S.B. 1990. The Introduction to Analytic Hierarchy Process, Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
3. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F. and Luque, M. 2004. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 154: 98-109.
4. Tanino, T. 1984. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 12: 117-131.
5. Jiang, Y.L. 2007. An approach to group decision making based on interval fuzzy preference relations. Journal of System Science and System Engineering, 16: 113-120.
6. Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8: 338-353.
7. Zadeh, L.A. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, part I. Information Sciences, 8: 199-249.
8. Atanassov, K. 1986. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20: 87-96.
9. Atanassov, K. 1999. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
10. Pankowska, A. and Wygralak, M. 2006. General IF-sets with triangular norms and their applications to group decision making. Information Sciences, 176: 2713-2754.
11. Wei, G.W. 2008. Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21: 833-836.
12. Szmidt, E. and Kacprzyk, J. 2005. A new concept of a similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3558: 272-282.
13. Szmidt, E. and Kacprzyk, J. 2003. A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 18: 837-852.
14. Xu, Z.S. 2007. A survey of preference relations. International Journal of General Systems, 36: 179-203.
15. Xu, Z.S. 2007. An approach to group decision making based on interval valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 27: 126-132.
16. Xu, Z.S. 2007. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences, 177: 2363-2379.
17. Xu, Z.S. 2007. A method for estimating criteria weights from intuitionistic preference relations, 503-512. Guangzhou: International Conference on Fuzzy Information and Engineering.
18. Van Laarhoven, P. J. M. and Pedrycs, W. 1983. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11: 229-241.
19. Kwiesielewicz, M. 1996. The logarithmic least squares and the generalized pseudo-inverse in estimating ratios. European Journal of Operational Research, 93: 611-619.
20. Kwiesielewicz, M. 1998. A note on the fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 95: 161-172.
21. Xu, Z.S. 2004. Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 36: 261-270.
22. Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F. and Herrera-Viedma, E. 2008. A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23: 155-175.
23. Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F. and Herrera, F. 2007. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, 15: 863-877.
24. Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F. and Alonso, S. 2007. Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics, 37: 176-189.
25. Wei, G.W. 2009. Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems, 17: 179-196.
26. Wei, G.W., Zhao, X.F. and Lin, R. 2010. Some induced aggregating operators with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information and their applications to group decision making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 3: 84-95.
27. Wei, G.W. 2010. Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 10: 423-431.
28. Tizhoosh, H. R. 2008. Interval-valued versus intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Isomorphism versus semantics. Pattern Recognition, 41: 1812-1813.
29. Atanassov, K. and Gargov, G. 1989. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31: 343-349.
30. Bustince, H. and Burillo, P. 1996. Vague sets are intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79: 403-405.
31. Cornelis, C., Deschrijver, G. and Kerre, E. E. 2004. Implication in intuitionistic fuzzy and interval-valued fuzzy set theory: construction, classification, application. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 35: 55-95.
32. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. 1978. Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal Systems Science, 6: 613-626.
33. Moore, R.E. 1966. Interval Analysis, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Enblewood Cliffs.
34. Moore, R.E. and Lodwick, W. 2003. Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 135: 5-9.
35. Gong, Z.W. 2008. Least square method to priority of the fuzzy preference relation with incomplete information. Int J of Approximate Reasoning, 47: 258-264.
36. Xu, Z.S. 2004. Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
37. Gong, Z.W. and Liu, S.F. 2006. Research on consistency and priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 14: 64-68.
38. Dimitrov, D. 2004. The Paretian liberal with intuitionistic fuzzy preferences: A result. Soc Choice Welfare, 23: 149-156.
39. Li, D.F., Wang, Y.C., Liu, S. and Shan, F. 2009. Fractional programming methodology for multi-attribute group decision-making using IFS. Applied Soft Computing, 9: 219-225.
40. Li, D.F. 2005. Multiattribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 70: 73-85.
41. Sugihara, K., Ishii, H. and Tanaka, H. 2004. Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 158: 745-754.