A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-175

  Alonso, S ^a   Chiclana, F ^b   Herrera, F ^a   Herrera Viedma, E ^a   Alcala Fdez J ^a   Porcel, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LINGUISTICS;

MISSING VALUES;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 38949200554     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.20262     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Evangelos T. Multi-criteria decision making methods: a comparative study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
2. Fodor J, Roubens M. Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994.
3. Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1998;97:33-48.
4. González-Pachón J, Gómez D, Montero J, Yáñez J. Searching for the dimension of valued preference relations. Int J Approx Reason 2003;33:133-157.
5. Kacprzyk J. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1986;18:105-118.
6. Orlovski SA. Decision-making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1978; 1:155-167.
7. Kahraman C, R-an D, Dogan I. Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Inform Sci 2003;157:135-153.
8. Switalski Z. General transitivity conditions for fuzzy reciprocal preference matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2003;137:85-100.
9. Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F Multiperson decision making based on multiplicative preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 2001;129:372-385.
10. Macharis C, Springael J, De Brucker K, Verbeke A. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. Eur J Oper Res 2004;153:307-317.
11. Saaty ThL. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
12. Saaty ThL, Vargas L. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 2000.
13. Stam A, Duarte Silva AP. On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP Eur J Oper Res 2003;145:92-108.
14. Bilgiç T. Interval-valued preference structures. Eur J Oper Res 1998;105:162-183.
15. Herrera F, Martínez L, Sánchez PJ. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 2005; 166:115-132.
16. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 2003;18:837-852.
17. Xu ZS. On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 2004;3:217-225.
18. Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E. Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 2000;120:144-161.
19. Xu ZS. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inform Sci 2004;166:19-30.
20. Xu ZS. Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation. Int J Approx Reason 2004;36:261-270.
21. Kim SH, Choi SH, Kim JK. An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach. Eur J Oper Res 1999; 118:139-152.
22. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M. Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 2004;154:98-109.
23. Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. A learning procedure to estimate missing values in fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. In: Proc 1st Int Conf on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2004), Barcelona (Spain). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence vol. 3131. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp. 227-238.
24. Miller GA. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity of processing information. Psychol Rev 1956;63:81-97.
25. Zadeh LA. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning, Part I. Inform Sci 1975;8:199-249.
26. Herrera F, Martínez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2000;8:746-752.
27. Herrera F, Martínez L. The 2-tuple linguistic computational model. Advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency. Int J Uncertain, Fuzziness and Knowl-Based Syst 2001;92:33-48.
28. Tanino T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1984;12:117-131.
29. Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multiplicative decision making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2001;122:277-291.
30. Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S. A group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst, Man Cybern, Part B 2007;37(1):176-189.