Coexistence of two stage-structured intraguild predators

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 308, Issue , 2012, Pages 36-44

  Schellekens, Tim ^a   van Kooten, Tobias ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Life history omnivory; Niche widening; Ontogenetic diet shifts; Reciprocal predation; Tritrophic food chain

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; DIETARY SHIFT; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY; NICHE; OMNIVORY; ONTOGENY; PERSISTENCE; PREDATOR; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ADULT ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDING; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; JUVENILE ANIMAL; LIFE HISTORY; NONHUMAN; OMNIVORE; OMNIVORY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PREDATOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES COEXISTENCE; TROPHIC LEVEL;

AGING; ANIMALS; BIOMASS; DIET; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84862161863     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Amarasekare P. Coexistence of intraguild predators and prey in resource-rich environments. Ecology 2008, 89:2786-2797.
2. Arim M., Marquet P.A. Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:557-564.
3. Balfour R.A., Buddle C.M., Rypstra A.L., Walker S.E., Marshall S.D. Ontogenetic shifts in competitive interactions and intra-guild predation between two wolf spider species. Ecol. Entomol. 2003, 28:25-30.
4. Borer E.T. Intraguild predation in larval parasitoids: implications for coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:957-965.
5. Borer E.T. Does adding biological detail increase coexistence in an intraguild predation model? Ecol. Model. 2006, 196:447-461.
6. Brose U., Jonsson T., Berlow E.L., Warren P., Banasek-Richter C., Bersier L.F., Blanchard J.L., Brey T., Carpenter S.R., Blandenier M.F.C., Cushing L., Dawah H.A., Dell T., Edwards F., Harper-Smith S., Jacob U., Ledger M.E., Martinez N.D., Memmott J., Mintenbeck K., Pinnegar J.K., Rall B.C., Rayner T.S., Reuman D.C., Ruess L., Ulrich W., Williams R.J., Woodward G., Cohen J.E. Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 2006, 87:2411-2417.
7. De Roos A.M. Demographic analysis of continuous-time life-history models. Ecol Lett. 2008, 11:1-15.
8. De Roos A.M., Schellekens T., van Kooten T., van de Wolfshaar K., Claessen D., Persson L. Food-dependent growth leads to overcompensation in stage-specific Biomass when mortality increases: The influence of maturation versus reproduction regulation. Amer. Nat. 2007, 170:E59-E76.
9. De Roos A.M., Schellekens T., van Kooten T., van de Wolfshaar K., Claessen D., Persson L. Simplifying a physiologically structured population model to a stage-structured biomass model. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2008, 73:47-62.
10. Diehl S., Feissel M. Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. Amer. Nat. 2000, 155:200-218.
11. Finke D.L., Denno R.F. Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia 2006, 149:265-275.
12. Haefner J.W., Edson J.L. Community invasion by complex life cycles. J. Theor. Biol. 1984, 108:377-404.
13. Hartvig M., Andersen K.H., Beyer J.E. Food web framework for size-structured populations. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 272:113-122.
14. HilleRisLambers R., Dieckmann U. Competition and predation in simple food webs: intermediately strong trade-offs maximize coexistence. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B 2003, 270:2591-2598.
15. Hin V., Schellekens T., De Roos A.M., Persson L. Coexistence of predators and prey in intraguild predation systems with ontogenetic niche shifts. Amer. Nat. 2011, 178:701-714.
16. Holt R.D., Polis G.A. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. Amer. Nat. 1997, 149:745-764.
17. Holt R.D., Huxel G.R. Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: Theoretical perspectives. Ecology 2007, 88:2706-2712.
18. Janssen A., Sabelis M.W., Magalhäes S., Montserrat M., Van der Hammen T Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 2007, 88:2713-2719.
19. Kooi B., Boer M., Kooijman S. On the use of the logistic equation in models of food chains. Bull. Math. Biol. 1998, 60:231-246.
20. Krivan V. Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2000, 58:79-94.
21. Krivan V., Diehl S. Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theor. Pop. Biol. 2005, 67:85-99.
22. Kuznetsov Y.A., Levitin V.V., Skovoroda A.R. Continuation of stationary solutions to evolution problems in content 1996, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam.
23. Law R., Plank M.J., James A., Blanchard J.L. Size-spectra dynamics from stochastic predation and growth of individuals. Ecology 2009, 90:802-811.
24. League-Pike P.E., Shulman M.J. Intraguild Predators: Behavioral Changes and Mortality of the Green Crab (Carcinus Maenas) during Interactions with the American Lobster (Homarus Americanus) and Jonah Crab (Cancer Borealis). J. Crust. Biol. 2009, 29:350-355.
25. Loreau M., Ebenhoh W. Competitive-exclusion and coexistence of species with complex life-cycles. Theor. Pop. Biol. 1994, 46:58-77.
26. McCann K. Density-dependent coexistence in fish communities. Ecology 1998, 79:2957-2967.
27. Moll J.D., Brown J.S. Competition and coexistence with multiple life-history stages. Amer. Nat. 2008, 171:839-843.
28. Mougi A., Nishimura K. Coexistence of competitive species with a stage-structured life cycle. Ecol. Res. 2005, 20:581-589.
29. Mylius S.D., Klumpers K., de Roos A.M., Persson L. Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. Amer. Nat. 2001, 158:259-276.
30. Ojeda F.P., Dearborn J.H. Feeding ecology of benthic mobile predators - experimental analyses of their influence in rocky subtidal communities of the Gulf of Maine. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 1991, 149:13-44.
31. Oksanen L., Fretwell S.D., Arruda J., Niemela P. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Amer. Nat. 1981, 118:240-261.
32. Okuyama T. Invited views in basic and applied ecology - Intraguild predation with spatially structured interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2008, 9:135-144.
33. Persson L., De Roos A.M. Mixed competition-predation: potential vs. realized interactions. J. Anim. Ecol. 2012, 81:483-493.
34. Peters R.H. The ecological implications of body size 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Pimm S.L., Lawton J.H. Feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 1978, 275:542-544.
36. Pimm S.L., Rice J.C. The Dynamics of multispecies, multi-life-stage models of aquatic food webs. Theor. Pop. Biol. 1987, 32:303-325.
37. Polis G.A. Complex trophic interactions in deserts - an empirical critique of food-web theory. Amer. Nat. 1991, 138:123-155.
38. Polis G.A., Strong D.R. Food web complexity and community dynamics. Am. Nat. 1996, 147:813-846.
39. Polis G.A., Myers C.A., Holt R.D. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation - potential competitors that eat each other. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20:297-330.
40. Polis G.A., Holt R.D., Menge B.A., Winemiller K.O. Time, space and life history: influences on food webs. Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics 1996, 435-460. Chapman & Hall, New York. G.A. Polis, K.O. Winemiller (Eds.).
41. Ropes J.W. Feeding Habits of Green Crab, Carcinus-Maenas (L). United States Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin 1969, 67:183-&.
42. Rossong M.A., Williams P.J., Comeau M., Mitchell S.C., Apaloo J. Agonistic interactions between the invasive green crab, Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus) and juvenile American lobster, Homarus americanus (Milne Edwards). J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2006, 329:281-288.
43. Rudolf V.H.W. The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: Consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 2007, 88:2697-2705.
44. Rudolf V.H.W., Armstrong J. Emergent impacts of cannibalism and size refuges in prey on intraguild predation systems. Oecologia 2008, 157:675-686.
45. Rudolf V.H.W., Lafferty K.D. Stage structure alters how complexity affects stability of ecological networks. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:75-79.
46. Rypstra A.L., Samu F. Size dependent intraguild predation and cannibalism in coexisting wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 2005, 33:390-397.
47. Schellekens, T., De Roos, A.M., and Persson, L., 2010. Ontogenetic diet shifts result in niche partitioning between two consumer species irrespective of competitive abilities. American Naturalist.
48. Tilman D. Resource competition and community structure 1982, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
49. van de Wolfshaar K.E., de Roos A.M., Persson L. Size-dependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. Amer. Nat. 2006, 168:62-75.
50. Van Leeuwen A., De Roos A.M., Persson L. How cod shapes its world. J. Sea Res. 2008, 60:89-104.
51. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1984, 15:393-425.
52. Williams P.J., Floyd T.A., Rossong M.A. Agonistic interactions between invasive green crabs, Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus), and sub-adult American lobsters, Homarus americanus (Milne Edwards). J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 2006, 329:66-74.
53. Williams R.J., Martinez N.D. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 2000, 404:180-183.
54. Woodward G., Hildrew A.G. Body-size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:1063-1074.
55. Woodward G., Ebenman B., Emmerson M., Montoya J.M., Olesen J.M., Valido A., Warren P.H. Body size in ecological networks. Trend Ecol. Evolut. 2005, 20:402-409.
56. Yodzis P., Innes S. Body size and consumer-resource dynamics. Am. Nat. 1992, 139:1151-1175.