Coexistence of predator and prey in intraguild predation systems with ontogenetic niche shifts

American Naturalist

Volumn 178, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 701-714

  Hin, Vincent ^a   Schellekens, Tim ^b,c   Persson, Lennart ^b   de Roos, André M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternative stable states; Intraguild predation; Life history omnivory; Ontogenetic niche shifts; Stage dependent interactions; Tritrophic food chain

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; BODY SIZE; COEXISTENCE; DIET; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; FOOD CHAIN; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; JUVENILE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NEUTRALIZATION; OMNIVORY; ONTOGENY; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; RESOURCE USE; TRITROPHIC INTERACTION; YOUNG POPULATION;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DIET; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DIET; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 81355153400     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/662676     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amarasekare, P. 2008. Coexistence of intraguild predators and prey in resource-rich environments. Ecology 89:2786-2797.
2. Arim, M., and P. A. Marquet. 2004. Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecology Letters 7: 557-564.
3. Borer, E. T. 2002. Intraguild predation in larval parasitoids: implications for coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:957-965.
4. Borer, E. T. 2006. Does adding biological detail increase coexistence in an intraguild predation model? Ecological Modelling 196:447-461.
5. Borer, E. T., C. J. Briggs, and R. D. Holt. 2007. Predators, parasitoids, and pathogens: a cross-cutting examination of intraguild predation theory. Ecology 88:2681-2688.
6. Brown, J. H., J. F. Gillooly, A. P. Allen, V. M. Savage, and G. B. West. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771-1789.
7. Byström, P., L. Persson, and E. Wahlstrom. 1998. Competing predators and prey: juvenile bottlenecks in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 79:2153-2167.
8. Casini, M., J. Hjelm, J. C. Molinero, J. Lovgren, M. Cardinale, V. Bartolino, A. Belgrano, et al. 2009. Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:197-202.
9. Crumrine, P. 2005. Size structure and substitutability in an odonate intraguild predation system. Oecologia (Berlin) 145:132-139.
10. Crumrine, P. 2010. Size-structured cannibalism between top predators promotes the survival of intermediate predators in an intraguild predation system. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:636-646.
11. de Roos, A. M., T. Schellekens, T. van Kooten, K. E. van deWolfshaar, D. Claessen, and L. Persson. 2007. Food-dependent growth leads to overcompensation in stage-specific biomass when mortality increases: the influence of maturation versus reproduction regulation. American Naturalist 170:E59-E76.
12. de Roos, A. M., T. Schellekens, T. van Kooten, K. E. van deWolfshaar, D. Claessen, and L. Persson. 2008. Simplifying a physiologically structured population model to a stage-structured biomass model. Theoretical Population Biology 73:47-62.
13. Diehl, S., and M. Feissel. 2000. Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. American Naturalist 155:200-218.
14. Finke, D. L., and R. F. Denno. 2006. Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia (Berlin) 149:265-275.
15. Frank, K. T., B. Petrie, J. S. Choi, and W. C. Leggett. 2005. Trophic cascades in a formerly cod-dominated ecosystem. Science 308: 1621-1623.
16. Gillooly, J. F., J. H. Brown, G. B. West, V. M. Savage, and E. L. Charnov. 2001. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293:2248-2251.
17. Guill, C. 2009. Alternative dynamical states in stage-structured consumer populations. Theoretical Population Biology 76:168-178.
18. Hansen, P. J., P. K. Bjornsen, and B. W. Hansen. 1997. Zooplankton grazing and growth: scaling within the 2-2,000-mm body size range. Limnology and Oceanography 42:687-704.
19. Holt, R. D., and G. R. Huxel. 2007. Alternative prey and the dynamics of intraguild predation: theoretical perspectives. Ecology 88:2706-2712.
20. Holt, R. D., and G. A. Polis. 1997. A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. American Naturalist 149:745-764.
21. Jansen, P. A., H. Slettvold, A. G. Finstad, and A. Langeland. 2002. Niche segregation between Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta): an experimental study of mechanisms. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:6-11.
22. Janssen, A., M. Montserrat, R. HilleRisLambers, A. M. de Roos, A. Pallini, and M. W. Sabelis. 2006. Intraguild predation usually does not disrupt biological control. Pages 21-44 in J. Brodeur and G. Boivin, eds. Trophic and guild interactions in biological control: progress in biological control. Springer, Dordrecht.
23. Janssen, A., M. W. Sabelis, S. Magalhaes, M. Montserrat, and T. Van der Hammen. 2007. Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology 88:2713-2719.
24. Krivan, V. 2000. Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theoretical Population Biology 58:79-94.
25. Krivan, V., and S. Diehl. 2005. Adaptive omnivory and species coexistence in tri-trophic food webs. Theoretical Population Biology 67:85-99.
26. Kuznetsov, Y. A., V. V. Levitin, and A. R. Skovoroda. 1996. Continuation of stationary solutions to evolution problems in CONTENT. Report AM-R9611. Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam.
27. Mittelbach, G. G. 1988. Competition among refuging sunfishes and effects of fish density on littoral-zone invertebrates. Ecology 69: 614-623.
28. Mylius, S. D., K. Klumpers, A. M. de Roos, and L. Persson. 2001. Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. American Naturalist 158: 259-276.
29. Neill, W. E. 1988. Community responses to experimental nutrient perturbations in oligotrophic lakes. Pages 203-218 in B. Ebenman and L. Persson, eds. Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin.
30. Nilsson, N.-A. 1965. Food segregation between salmonid species in north Sweden. Report from the Institute of Freshwater Research Drottningholm 46:58-78.
31. Oksanen, L., S. D. Fretwell, J. Arruda, and P. Niemela. 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. American Naturalist 118:240-261.
32. Okuyama, T. 2008. Invited views in basic and applied ecology: intraguild predation with spatially structured interactions. Basic and Applied Ecology 9:135-144.
33. Olson, M. H., G. G. Mittelbach, and C. W. Osenberg. 1995. Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology 76:1758-1771.
34. Persson, L. 1988. Asymmetries in competitive and predatory interactions in fish populations. Pages 203-218 in B. Ebenman and L. Persson, eds. Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin.
35. Persson, L. 1991. Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:101-105.
36. Persson, L., and L. A. Greenberg. 1990. Juvenile competitive bottlenecks: the perch (Perca fluviatilis)-roach (Rutilus rutilus) interaction. Ecology 71:44-56.
37. Persson, L., S. Diehl, L. Johansson, G. Andersson, and S. F. Hamrin. 1992. Trophic interactions in temperate lake ecosystems: a test of food chain theory. American Naturalist 140:59-84.
38. Persson, L., P. A. Amundsen, A. M. de Roos, A. Klemetsen, R. Knudsen, and R. Primicerio. 2007. Culling prey promotes predator recovery: alternative states in a whole-lake experiment. Science 316: 1743-1746.
39. Peters, R. H. 1983. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge Studies in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Pimm, S. L., and J. H. Lawton. 1978. Feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275:542-544.
41. Pimm, S. L., and J. C. Rice. 1987. The dynamics of multispecies, multi-life-stage models of aquatic food webs. Theoretical Population Biology 32:303-325.
42. Polis, G. A. 1991. Complex trophic interactions in deserts: an empirical critique of food-web theory. American Naturalist 138:123-155.
43. Polis, G. A., and D. R. Strong. 1996. Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist 147:813-846.
44. Polis, G. A., C. A. Myers, and R. D. Holt. 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:297-330.
45. Rudolf, V. H.W. 2007. The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 88:2697-2705.
46. Rudolf, V. H. W., and J. Armstrong. 2008. Emergent impacts of cannibalism and size refuges in prey on intraguild predation systems. Oecologia (Berlin) 157:675-686.
47. Schellekens, T., A. M. de Roos, and L. Persson. 2010. Ontogenetic diet shifts result in niche partitioning between two consumer species irrespective of competitive abilities. American Naturalist 176: 625-637.
48. Schröder, A., K. A. Nilsson, L. Persson, T. van Kooten, and B. Reichstein. 2009. Invasion success depends on invader body size in a size-structured mixed predation-competition community. Journal of Animal Ecology 78:1152-1162.
49. Takimoto, G., T. Miki, and M. Kagami. 2007. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient. Theoretical Population Biology 72:264-273.
50. Vance-Chalcraft, H. D., J. A. Rosenheim, J. R. Vonesh, C. W. Osenberg, and A. Sih. 2007. The influence of intraguild predation on prey suppression and prey release: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88: 2689-2696.
51. Van de Wolfshaar, K. E., A. M. de Roos, and L. Persson. 2006. Sizedependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. American Naturalist 168:62-75.
52. Van Leeuwen, A., A. M. de Roos, and L. Persson. 2008. How cod shapes its world. Journal of Sea Research 60:89-104.
53. Verdy, A., and P. Amarasekare. 2010. Alternative stable states in communities with intraguild predation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 262:116-128.
54. Walters, C., and J. F. Kitchell. 2001. Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 39-50.
55. Werner, E. E., and J. F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and pecies interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15:393-425.
56. Werner, E. E., and D. J. Hall. 1979. Foraging efficiency and habitat witching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60:256-264.
57. Wilbur, H. M. 1988. Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. Pages 157-172 in B. Ebenman and L. Persson, eds. Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin.
58. Yodzis, P., and S. Innes. 1992. Body size and consumer-resource dynamics. American Naturalist 139:1151-1175.