Interactive robust cone contraction method for multiple objective optimization problems

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 327-357

  Kadziński, Miłosz ^a   Słowiński, Roman ^a,b  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

cone contraction; interactive procedure; Multiple objective optimization; pairwise comparisons; robust ordinal regression

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862107260     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622012400056     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. I. G. P. Asto Buditjahjanto and H. Miyauchi, An intelligent decision support based on a subtractive clustering and fuzzy inference system for multiobjective optimization problem in serious game, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(5) (2011) 793-810.
2. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2) (2002) 182-197.
3. G. Evans, An overview of techniques for solving multiobjective mathematical problems, Management Science 30(11) (1984) 1268-1282.
4. J. Figueira, S. Greco, V. Mousseau and R. Slowinski, Interactive multiobjective optimization using a set of additive value functions, in Multiobjective Optimization, eds. J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen and R. Slowinski, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5252 (Springer, 2008), pp. 97-119.
5. J. Figueira, S. Greco and R. Slowinski, Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method, European Journal of Operational Research 195(2) (2009) 460-486.
6. J. Granat and F. Guerriero, The interactive analysis of the multicriteria shortest path problem by the reference point method, European Journal of Operational Research 151(1) (2003) 103-118.
7. J. Granat and M. Makowski, Interactive specification and analysis of aspiration-based preferences, European Journal of Operational Research 122(2) (2000) 469-485.
8. S. Greco, M. Kadzinski, V. Mousseau and R. Slowinski, Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP, Decision Support Systems 52(3) (2012) 549-561.
9. S. Greco, M. Kadzinski, V. Mousseau and R. Slowinski, ELECTREGKMS: Robust ordinal regression for outranking methods, European Journal of Operational Research 214(1) (2011) 118-135.
10. S. Greco, M. Kadzinski and R. Slowinski, Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria sorting, Computers & Operations Research 38(11) (2011) 1620-1637.
11. S. Greco, V. Mousseau and R. Slowinski, Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions, European Journal of Operational Research 191(2) (2008) 415-435.
12. J. Ignatius, A. Mustafa, M. Jantan, C. P. Lim, T. Ramayah and J. Yeap Ai Leen, A multiobjective sensitivity approach to training providers' evaluation and quota allocation planning, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10(1) (2011) 147-174.
13. A. Jaszkiewicz, Interactive multiobjective optimization with the Pareto memetic algorithm, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 32(1) (2007) 15-32.
14. A. Jaszkiewicz and R. Slowinski, Cone contraction method with visual interaction for multiple objective non linear programmes, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 1(1) (1992) 29-46.
15. A. Jaszkiewicz and R. Slowinski, The Light Beam Search approach - an overview of methodology and applications, European Journal of Operational Research 113(2) (1999) 300-314.
16. M. Kadzinski, S. Greco and R. Slowinski, Selection of a representative value function for robust ordinal regression in group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10726-011-9277-z.
17. M. Kadzinski, S. Greco and R. Slowinski, Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression, Omega 40(4) (2012) 488-501.
18. M. Kadzinski, S. Greco and R. Slowinski, Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice, European Journal of Operational Research 217(3) (2012) 541-553.
19. I. Kaliszewski, Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994).
20. M. Köksalan and E. Karasakal, An interactive approach for multiobjective decision making, Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(5) (2006) 532-540.
21. P. Korhonen, Interactive methods, in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, eds. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott (Springer, Boston, 2005), pp. 641-666.
22. B. Kozlowski and W. Ogryczak, On ordered weighted reference point model for multiattribute procurement auctions, in Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications, eds. P. Jedrzejowicz, N. Nguyen and K. Hoang, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6922 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 294-303.
23. A. Lewandowski and A. P. Wierzbicki (eds.) Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems Theory, Software and Applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
24. M. Luque, K. Miettinen, P. Eskelinen and F. Ruiz, Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization, Omega 37(2) (2009) 450-462.
25. K. Miettinen, F. Ruiz and A. P. Wierzbicki, Introduction to Multiobjective Optimization: Interactive Approaches, in Multiobjective Optimization, eds. J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen and R. Slowinski, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5252 (Springer, 2008), pp. 27-57.
26. H. Nakayama and Y. Sawaragi, Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming, in Interactive Decision Analysis, eds. M. Grauer and A. P. Wierzbicki, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 229 (Springer, Berlin, 1984), pp. 113-122.
27. W. Ogryczak, A goal programming model of the reference point method, Annals of Operations Research 51 (1994) 33-44.
28. W. Ogryczak, On goal programming formulations of the reference point method, The Journal of the Operational Research Society 52 (2001) 691-698.
29. W. Ogryczak and B. Kozlowski, Reference point method with importance weighted ordered partial achievements, TOP 19 (2011) 380-401.
30. R. Slowinski, Review of multiple objective programming methods (part I in Polish), Przeglad Statystyczny 31 (1984) 47-63.
31. R. E. Steuer, Vector-maximum gradient cone contraction techniques, in Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 155 (Springer, Berlin, 1978), pp. 462-481.
32. R. E. Steuer, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application (John Wiley, New York, 1986), p. 546.
33. R. E. Steuer and E. Choo, An interactive weighted tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming, Mathematical Programming 26(1) (1983) 326-344.
34. D. Vanderpooten and Ph. Vincke, Description and analysis of some representative interactive multicriteria procedures, Appl. Math. Comp. 83(2-3) (1997) 261-280.
35. A. P. Wierzbicki, A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making, Mathematical Modelling 3 (1982) 391-405.
36. A. P. Wierzbicki, On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems, OR Spektrum 8 (1986) 73-87.
37. A. P. Wierzbicki, Reference point approaches, in Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, eds. T. Gal, T. Stewart and T. Hanne (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999), pp. 9.1-9.39.
38. A. P. Wierzbicki, M. Makowski and J. Wessels (eds.), Model-Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications, Mathematical Modeling and Applications (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000).
39. E. Zitzler, K. Deb and L. Thiele, Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results, Evolutionary Computation 8(2) (2000) 173-195.