LightGuide: Projected visualizations for hand movement guidance

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 179-188

  Sodhi, Rajinder ^a,b   Benko, Hrvoje ^a   Wilson, Andrew D ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Appropriated surfaces; On body computing; On demand interfaces; Spatial augmented reality; Tracking

Indexed keywords

AVERAGE ERRORS; BODY PARTS; COMPUTER DISPLAY; DEPTH CAMERA; FEED-FORWARD; HAND ANIMATION; HAND MOVEMENT; INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; ON-BODY; PROOF OF CONCEPT; USER STUDY;

ANIMATION; AUGMENTED REALITY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; SURFACE DISCHARGES;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84862103517     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2207702     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Baird, K.M. and Barfield, W. Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task. Virtual Reality 4, 4, 1999, 250-259.
2. Banaji, M.R. Stevens, Stanley Smith (1906-73). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994.
3. Bau, O. and Mackay, W.E. OctoPocus: a dynamic guide for learning gesture-based command sets. Proc. UIST, 2008, 37-46.
4. Britannica. http://britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/150794/dancenotation.
5. Cao, X. and Balakrishnan, R. Interacting with dynamically defined information spaces using a handheld projector and a pen. Proc. UIST, 2006, 225-234.
6. Cao, X., Forlines, C., and Balakrishnan, R. Multi-user interaction using handheld projectors. Proc. UIST, 2007, 43-52.
7. Daniel Dementhon, L.D. Model-Based object pose in 25 lines of code. Proc. of IJCV 15, 1 (1995), 123-141.
8. Feiner, Steve, Blaire Macintyre, D.S. Knowledge-Based augmented reality. Commun. ACM 36, 7, 1993, 53-62.
9. Felzenszwalb, P.F. and Huttenlocher, D.P. Distance transforms of sampled functions. 2004.
10. Flagg, M. and Rehg, J.M. Projector guided painting. Proc. UIST, 2006, 235-244.
11. Freeman, D., Benko, H., Morris, M.R., and Wigdor, D. ShadowGuides : Visualizations for In-Situ Learning of Multi-Touch and Whole-Hand Gestures. Proc. ITS, 2009, 165-172.
12. Harrison, C., Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., and Way, O.M. OmniTouch : Wearable multitouch interaction everywhere. Proc. UIST, 2011, 441-450.
13. Harrison, C., Tan, D., and Morris, D. Skinput : Appropriating the body as an input surface. Proc. CHI, 2010, 453-462.
14. Holz, C. and Wilson, A. Data miming: inferring spatial object descriptions from human gesture. Proc. CHI, 2011, 811-820.
15. Hua, H., Brown, L.D., and Gao, C. Scape : Supporting Stereoscopic Collaboration in Projective Environments. Proc. CG, 2004, 66-75.
16. InFocus. http://www.infocus.com.
17. Jacob, R. The perceptual structure of multidimensional input device selection. Proc. CHI, 1992, 211-218.
18. Kane, S.K., Avrahami, D., Wobbrock, J.O., and Harrison, B. Bonfire : A Nomadic system for hybrid laptop-tabletop interaction. Proc. UIST, 2009, 129-138.
19. Kirk, D. and Stanton Fraser, D. Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks. Proc. CHI, 2006, 1191-1200.
20. Mistry, P. and Maes, P. WUW-wear Ur world: a wearable gestural interface. Proc. CHI, 2009, 4111-4116.
21. Motokawa, Y. and Saito, H. Support system for guitar playing using augmented reality display. Proc. ISMAR, 2006, 243-244.
22. Neumann, U. and Majoros, A. Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance. Proc. of VR, 1998, 4-11.
23. Palmiter, S. and Elkerton, J. An evaluation of animated demonstrations of learning computer-based tasks. Proc. CHI, 1991, 257-263.
24. Pinhanez, C. The Everywhere Displays Projector: A Device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces. Proc. UbiComp, 2001, 315-331.
25. Raskar, R., Beardsley, P., Van Baar, J., et al. RFIG Lamps: interacting with a self-describing world via photosensing wireless tags and projectors. Proc. of SIGGRAPH, 2004, 406-415.
26. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Cutts, M., Lake, A., Stesin, L., and Fuchs, H. The office of the future: A unified approach to image-based modeling and spatially immersive displays. Proc. SIGGRAPH, 1998, 179-188.
27. Raskar, R., Welch, G., Low, K.L., and Bandyopadhyay, D. Shader lamps: Animating real objects with image-based illumination. Proc. Eurographics, 2001, 89-102.
28. Rosenthal, S., Kane, S.K., Wobbrock, J.O., and Avrahami, D. Augmenting On-Screen Instructions with Micro-Projected Guides : When it works, and when it fails. Proc. UbiComp, 2010, 203-212.
29. SynchronousObjects. http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu.
30. Tan, D.S., Pausch, R., and Hodgins, J. Exploiting the cognitive and social benefits of physically large displays. 2004.
31. Watson, G., Curran, R., Butterfield, J., and Craig, C. The effect of using animated work instructions over text and static graphics when performing a small scale engineering assembly. Proc. CE, 2008, 541-550.
32. White, S., Lister, L., and Feiner, S. Visual Hints for tangible gestures in augmented reality. Proc. ISMAR, 2007, 1-4.
33. Wilson, A.D. and Benko, H. Combining multiple depth cameras and projectors for interactions on, above and between surfaces. Proc. UIST, 2010, 273-282.
34. Zhang, Z. Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces. JCV 13, 2 1994, 119-152.